Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Synopsys Defensics vs WhiteHat Dynamic comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Synopsys Defensics
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Fuzz Testing Tools (5th)
WhiteHat Dynamic
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Synopsys Defensics is designed for Fuzz Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 20.5%, up 12.0% compared to last year.
WhiteHat Dynamic, on the other hand, focuses on Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), holds 7.0% mindshare, up 5.5% since last year.
Fuzz Testing Tools
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user586716 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical support provided protocol-specific documentation to prove that some positives were not false.
A security assurance engineer was able to perform due diligence across all network-facing protocols. My prior organization designed, developed and deployed a Network Attached Storage (NAS) appliance. A key part of the company wide security assurance program for all products, is to perform penetration testing against all network facing IP ports. For the web, SSL and RESTful APIs, there are very good COTS and open source tools to perform Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) testing. Unfortunately for NAS protocols like SMB, NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI, I researched and found that Codenomicon Defensics was the only viable source to satisfy our DAST requirements. Through the use of Selenium for automated web testing, it was easily found out that Codenomicon Defensics could be integrated into our Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment (CI / CD) Agile processes, specific to automated testing. Also, like many of the other application security testing products, Defensics incorporates automatic update support and works on Windows, MacOS and Linux desktops.
it_user245412 - PeerSpot reviewer
The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.
* The continuous online scanning capabilities and reporting features. * The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy. * The ability to review security items quickly along with being able to retest vulnerabilities on our schedule make the Sentinel product an invaluable tool for our company’s product security requirements.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fuzz Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Defensics, Codenomicon Defensics
Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Coriant, CERT-FI, Next Generation Networks
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Synopsys Defensics and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.