Databricks Reviews

We use it for data analysis and testing of high volume web user behavioral data.

Databricks makes it really easy to use a number of technologies to do data analysis. In terms of languages, we can use Scala, Python, and SQL. Databricks enables you to run very large queries, at a massive scale, within really good timeframes.

I'm starting to build a solution using Delta Live Tables and Delta Live pipelines, and it is proving to be exceptionally easy to use. I have also been able to quickly implement a pipeline.

Databricks has added some alerts and query functionality into their SQL persona, but the whole SQL persona, which is like a role, needs a lot of development. The alerts are not very flexible, and the query interface itself is not as polished as the notebook interface that is used through the data science and machine learning persona. It is clunky at present.

I've been using Databricks for a year.

It is a stable and reliable solution. I'd rate stability at eight out of ten.

Databricks is absolutely scalable, and I'd rate scalability at eight out of ten. We probably have between 60 and 100 users in our organization, and we hope to increase usage in the future.

The technical support staff we have worked with have been amazing. They helped us initially with our Delta Live pipelines. I would give them a rating of ten out of ten.

Positive

I have previously worked with Apache Hadoop, and Databricks is definitely a better product. It's much easier to get data quickly in Databricks. As a result, a lot of the drudgery is taken away. Whereas with Hadoop, it's a bit more tricky to get data together.

We're charged on what the data throughput is and also what the compute time is.

I'd strongly recommend giving Databricks a try. We have found it to be a fantastic tool that has accelerated some of our solutions. We're an AI-heavy shop, and there are a lot of data scientists using the MLflow capabilities. I hear a lot of good things from that side as well. From a data analysis point of view, Databricks has been fantastic, and I would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten.

We mainly use Databricks to process ingest and do the ELT processes of data to get it ready for analytics and to serve the data to ThoughtSpot, which calls queries and Databricks to get the data.

We didn't have any good tooling for ELT processing prior to Databricks. We were using Microsoft HD Insight, but it was taking too long to process the data. When we changed our data-processing ELT processes over to Databricks, the amount of time to process the data was reduced to a fraction of what HD Insight used, so we were able to run jobs much faster.

Databricks' most valuable feature is the data transformation through PySpark.

Databricks' performance when serving the data to an analytics tool isn't as good as Snowflake's. In the next release, Databricks should include a better data-sharing platform to facilitate data sharing between companies.

I've been using Databricks for three years.

Databricks' stability has been great, and I would rate it eight out of ten.

Databricks is very scalable because it's very easy to spin up multiple clusters, but the cost of doing that is tremendous. I'd rate its scalability nine out of ten, but you'll pay for it.

The technical support has been really bad, but that's because we don't have a direct agreement with Databricks.

Neutral

I previously used HD Insight from Microsoft, but it took many, many hours to process data, so we switched to Databricks.

The initial setup was pretty complex and required three people.

We used an in-house team with some consulting help.

We've had a low ROI from Databricks.

I would rate Databricks' pricing seven out of ten.

I would advise anyone thinking of implementing Databricks to know their use case. For example, if you're looking for a big data repository to query data and do ELT processing, I recommend looking at other platforms, like Snowflake. However, if you're going to do AI and machine learning, then Databricks is probably stronger in that area. Overall, I would rate Databricks seven out of ten.

Our primary use case for the solution is data analysis by providing a Spark cluster environment with a driver to analyze a huge amount of data and gigabytes of data and can create Notebooks in Databricks. We can write SQL commands, Python code, Scala, or Spark with Python. With Databricks, we get a cluster hosted in the public cloud and we adjust it based on how much we use it.

The most valuable features are data engineering and data science because we can create Notebooks on them. We can use any Python library to build data science models, or we can use libraries like Seaborn or Matplotlib to create charts based on data for data analysis. It is a really valuable capability.

Microsoft Azure has its learning environment on the Microsoft website. We can complete certifications, but the Databricks certification is more expensive than Microsoft. It costs between $2,000 and $2,500, and the knowledge is linked. They're also charged based on whether a person doesn't want to analyze large amounts of data. Hence, we want to have the capacity for free student users so that people can learn and build their professional skills.

We have been using the solution for approximately one year.

The solution is stable. Microsoft offers a public service, and we can get it from the Databricks website. Additionally, many companies use it to analyze their data or create a Spark cluster to run Python or SQL scripts based on their data. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The setup is quite easy, and Databricks has also partnered with Microsoft, so we get this service on Microsoft Azure.

We have seen a return on investment.

We have a pay-as-you-go subscription and pay for it based on our usage.

We chose this solution because my company uses Microsoft Azure for a project, and my role as a data engineer primarily focuses on data-related services. For storing data, we use Data Lake; similarly, for the data processing engine, we use Spark, which Databricks provides.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including drag-and-drop features because it can be helpful for users who are unfamiliar with coding. I advise new users to have prior experience with Python or SQL before utilizing this solution if they use it for data science or model building. 

I would like to see the integration between Databricks and MLflow improved. It is quite hard to train multiple models in parallel in the distributed fashions. You hit rate limits on the clients very fast.

I have been using Databricks for three years.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine out of 10, with one being not stable and 10 being very stable.

I would rate the scalability of this solution an eight out of 10, with one being not scalable and 10 being very scalable.

There are three people using this solution in our organization.

I would rate the available customer service a three. It's worth mentioning that this is Microsoft and not Databricks itself. I haven't spoken to Databricks people directly, but I know the people who have and they have been a lot more pleased.

Negative

I would rate their pricing plan a six (on a scale of one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive). I think the prices could be lowered a little bit.

Overall, I would rate this solution an eight out of 10, with one being quite poor and 10 being excellent. It is fast, it's scalable, and it does the job it needs to do.

We use this solution for advanced civilization power.

We like that this solution can handle a wide variety and velocity of data engineering, either in batch mode or real-time.

This product allows us to write the email models in a way that allows us to take the advantage of the parallel scaling computer window backend on any of the satellite services.

This solution only supports queries in SQL and Python, which is a bit limiting. 

This is a fairly expensive solution for any service outside of the basic package, and costs can add up quite quickly if there are large scaling requirements.

This is a stable solution in our experience.

We have found that part of the beauty of this platform is that it is easy to scale and expand.

The support for this product uses Microsoft as a middle man, and due to this there have been times when we experienced communication delays, as well as misunderstandings of what our issues are.

Neutral

The initial setup for this solution is very simple.

The basic version of this solution is now open-source, so there are no license costs involved. However, there is a charge for any advanced functionality and this can be quite expensive.

We looked at both Snowflake and BigQuery as a comparison with this solution. We choose this product as it offered more scalability and a higher level of security, which is extremely important in our banking environment.

We would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for the Customer Data Platform(CDP). My company works in the MarTech space and usually we implement custom CDP.

The Delta Lake data type has been the most useful part of this solution. Delta Lake is an opensource data type and it was implemented and invented by Databricks. It is the most important element of the solution. Databricks also offers exceptional performance and scalability. 

The data visualization for this solution could be improved. They have started to roll out a data visualization tool inside Databricks but it is in the early stages. It's not comparable to a solution like Power BI, Luca, or Tableau.

In a future release, we would like to have a better ETL designer tool to assist in the way we move data from one place to another.

We have been using this solution for four years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The initial setup is very easy. It is a managed solution inside Azure so you just need to search for Databricks. There are a couple of pages to follow in the setup wizard and Databricks is up and running.

We implement this solution on behalf of our customers who have their own Azure subscription and they pay for Databricks themselves. The pricing is more expensive if you have large volumes of data. 

When we first started using Databricks in 2018, there were not many comarable solutions to consider. Right now there are many solutions to consider including Snowflake, Azure Synapse, Redshift and BigQuery.

Databricks continues to be our solution of choice but Snowflake does have a better user interface and is easier to work with the data pipelines and with the overall UI.

I would advise others to first define a strong data strategy and then choose which data platform suits your needs. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

Our primary use case for this solution is research for data scientists. The solution is deployed on cloud.

It has allowed our data engineers, data scientists, and analysts to collaborate and work on the same platform. 

We have the ability to scale, collaborate and do machine learning.

The product cannot be integrated with a popular coding IDE.

We have been using this solution for approximately three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. There are five people using it in our organization.

I rate my experience with customer service and support an eight out of ten.

We previously used H2O.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Implementation was done in-house.

We have seen a return on investments.

Licensing costs are charged on a yearly basis and costs between 25,000 and 30,000.

We evaluated other options but this solution was the best fit for what we required.

I rate this solution nine out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by integrating with a popular coding IDE.

Our primary use case of this product is for our customers who are running large systems and looking for an API -- a quick, easy integration with their own system. We use Databricks to create a secure API interface. I'm vice president of data science and we are customers of Databricks. 

Databricks is quite easy to use and requires less coding and customizations than a solution like AWS SageMaker which I'd previously used on a lot of projects. Databricks enables more people to efficiently build and host their ML code. Another great aspect is that MLflow is already integrated with Databricks which makes a big difference. It enables us to track and monitor all our different experiments. We have mostly used the MLflow part and generic notebooks with the ML building machine learning model, as well as using Pytorch for some of our medical imaging. We were able to quickly deploy both these features without requiring anything extra. 

I'm struggling a little because I wanted to do some POC solutions. I present a lot of projects in various forums and seminars and there aren't a lot of credits and trial options with Databricks. Even if we want to explore, we're not able to and that's a challenge. The solution is quite expensive.

I've been using this solution for a year. 

It's currently stable although we have not yet tested it with a huge volume of data. We'll focus on the performance and model serving capability in the near future. We're still carrying out performance testing, developing the models and figuring out the infrastructure.

Scalability is quite good because we just used 128 GB of resources. It's quite easy to scale.

It was relatively simple, we didn't face any challenges. Deployment takes around two days. 

We did a PSU in Azure ML Studio which is quite a good solution, easy to deploy and use. It's almost a no-code platform. We've also found Azure ML Studio to be quite cost-effective.

I would recommend trying Databricks because it's cloud agnostic. A lot of customers currently use Azure but want to build something on their own down the track. Databricks makes that easy with its integration with other cloud customers. If somebody wants to build something on their infrastructure or their own virtual cloud, this is a good platform.

I rate the solution eight out of 10 because of the issue I'm having with a lack of trial options.