Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Databricks vs IBM SPSS Statistics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.0
Databricks pricing varies greatly based on usage and cluster type, often considered expensive with additional cloud storage costs.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Databricks is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues reported, especially during heavy processes, and receives high user ratings.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Databricks offers significant, praised scalability from megabytes to petabytes, supporting vertical and horizontal scaling with auto-scaling features.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Databricks support is praised for technical expertise and engagement, but experiences vary due to response times and Microsoft partner handling.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Databricks faces challenges with visualization, integration, costs, error clarity, libraries, interfaces, documentation, onboarding, automation, governance, and performance.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Databricks offers user-friendly large-scale analytics, seamless integration, versatile coding, collaborative tools, and efficient big data handling with extensive cloud support.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Databricks
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (1st)
IBM SPSS Statistics
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Data Mining (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Databricks is 19.1%, up from 19.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SPSS Statistics is 2.8%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Science Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Dunstan Matekenya - PeerSpot reviewer
Process large-scale data sets and integrates with Apache Spark with notebook environment
Databricks integrates natively with Apache Spark, which I use as a processing engine for large-scale datasets. This native integration is one of its strengths. Another strength is that the platform makes it very easy to manage resources. For example, setting up a cluster of five or fifteen nodes is straightforward with Databricks. The notebook environment is also excellent, making it easy to perform various tasks.
AbakarAhmat - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing survey analysis that provides valued insightfulness
I used traditional tools where I would prepare data, click through menus, and use SQL Server for data visualization. We switched to IBM SPSS because it offers strong certification and aligns well with the standards we prioritize in our surveys. In terms of popularity, it stands out as the top choice in the market, especially in the research and university domains. Many different organizations and institutions use SPSS for statistical analytics. While there are other tools like MCLab and similar options available, SPSS is the most renowned and widely used among them.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...
How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?
We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...
Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?
Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...
What do you like most about IBM SPSS Statistics?
The software offers consistency across multiple research projects helping us with predictive analytics capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM SPSS Statistics?
The cost of IBM SPSS Statistics is managed by organizations, not individual researchers. It is a very expensive product, despite being good.
What needs improvement with IBM SPSS Statistics?
IBM SPSS Statistics does not keep you close to your data like KNIME. In KNIME, at every stage, you can see the resulting file and annotate your trail of evidence. It takes you further from your dat...
 

Also Known As

Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash
SPSS Statistics
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware
LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA, Razorsight, Si.mobil, University Hospitals of Leicester, CROOZ Inc., GFS Fundraising Solutions, Nedbank Ltd., IDS-TILDA
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Statistics and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.