Fortinet FortiEDR Reviews

Fortinet FortiEDR protects our workstations against ransomware and other malicious applications.

The solution acts like an advanced antivirus with extended features like logging and automated response to detected threats. This automation helps save time, as the system automatically handles malicious detections and responses without much manual configuration.

The tool has saved me time managing workstation protection.

I did face some challenges using Fortinet FortiEDR, especially in the Mac environment. While the detections work well in Windows, Mac has limitations. If I need to configure something in the Mac environment, I have to open a support ticket because I can't do it myself; the support team has to apply the configurations on the backend.

I have two main suggestions for improvement: enhancing the UI and UX to make it more beginner-friendly and giving users more control over configurations in the Mac environment without contacting support.

I contacted Fortinet support, and I would describe it as really helpful. They responded quickly, usually within one or two business days, and the guidelines they provided were simple and easy to understand, even for non-technical engineers.

Positive

The solution's deployment is straightforward, but the dashboard can be confusing due to its less user-friendly design. I had to reach out to Fortinet support a few times, and they were quite helpful, usually responding within one to two business days. Their guidance made the configuration process easier.

The agents' deployment was simple and took about a week to complete across all workstations. However, fine-tuning the rules to manage false positives took longer—around three months.

I chose Fortinet FortiEDR because it's more cost-effective than competitors, potentially saving me up to half the price.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. 

We use FortiEDR for EDR on our internal environment, which includes about 2,900 endpoints.  

I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. I can also simulate phishing attacks. 

The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices. 

I have used FortiEDR for about 10 years.

I rate FortiEDR a 10 out of 10 for stability. 

I rate FortiEDR a six out of ten for scalability. It's scalable if you add on more product sets, but it isn't scalable by itself. You can add Fortinet solutions like FortiManager and FortiClient Configurator to improve the scalability. We have clients of all sizes. Around 40 percent are small businesses, 40 percent are medium-sized companies, and 20 percent are large enterprises. 

I rate Fortinet support a 10 out of 10. They have a strong team, and tickets are addressed quickly once they're logged on the portal. 

Positive

I rate FortiEDR an eight out of ten for ease of setup. The console is easy to set up, and there are ample tutorials on YouTube about how to do it. A 10-year-old could probably configure it accurately. 

FortiEDR is typically deployed on-prem for top SMB clients and multinational enterprises. We may use it on the cloud for our smaller clients. The deployment process involves scoping, due diligence, configuration, and testing. We have a detailed internal process at my company. Deployment requires two staff members. 

I rate FortiEDR an eight out of ten for affordability. 

I rate FortiEDR an eight out of ten. I give FortiEDR a high mark because it's well-priced for its features. It's a better value than other tools, such as Microsoft Defender. 

My advice to potential users is to understand your precise requirements and know that there are limitations around iOS and Linux. Before deploying, you should ensure that FortiEDR best fits your current environment. 

The implementation that we have is on one municipality in Serbia with, for example, 300 plus users. It was the FortiGate F200 EDR solution with an appliance and the necessary one-year support.

The best features depends on the customer. Our primary goal is to our customers. Mostly our customers use this as an endpoint solution for the workstations and really find it quite effective.

The stability is very good. 

It is scalable. 

The solution is pretty straightforward to set up.

We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels. You must know the technical issues and technical possibilities of this solution very well. It would be nice to have some sort of help to explain the potential of the product.

I've been using the solution for approximately three years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The scalability is okay. If you want to expand on some other products in the Fortinet Portfolio, it is very, very easy. For example, we're also using Fortinet's FortiNAC solution for IoT platforms or IoT devices. 

We have 500 users that use this solution daily.

We haven't really dealt with technical support.

We do have EDR solutions from other companies as well. 

We are a technical crew. Therefore, we had nice training, and everything worked quite well. We are satisfied with the process. It's not too difficult. That said, you must have knowledge of the product if you want to do an implementation for this kind of device. On a scale of one to ten, it's a seven. It's okay.

The pricing is pretty reasonable. I would rate it four out of five in terms of affordability.

We are a Fortinet partner. We are a system integrator company. We have some projects that use FortiGate products. We are a company that does business only in the public sector, in the government sector. We don't do corporate.

I'd advise those new to the solution to go one step at a time and not immediately try to tackle all of the features at once. As you grow, you can keep adding on and begin to implement other services. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use it for endpoint security. We were searching if it could replace our old EDR solution. 

We use it for everything now. We no longer have another security solution except from the Microsoft 365 package.

Fortinet FortiEDR handles our main endpoint security.

We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.

This solution has improved our endpoint security posture. Before this, we didn't have any EDR solution, just standard endpoint security. 

Now, with FortiEDR's behavior analysis and comprehensive threat detection, we definitely have better protection.

We chose FortiEDR because we were looking for a robust EDR solution. One thing that appealed to us was the potential integration with our FortiGate firewalls. 

We hoped to mitigate threats and stop the traffic by having the firewall and EDR work together, but this wasn't straightforward out-of-the-box. It needs specific configuration which hasn't been done yet. That was a bit unexpected.

I would like to improve the integration process because a big selling point was the ease of integration within the Fortinet ecosystem. I would expect more built-in collaboration to allow for easier threat mitigation across Fortinet systems.

The strength of FortiEDR lies in its overall ability to protect us from new threats. We have encountered issues with it as well.

We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team. I would like to see improved heuristics so the system better understands what's legitimate and doesn't keep blocking it after minor updates.

I have been using it for a year. We use the latest version in my company. 

I would rate the stability a six out of ten. 

We've had some erroneous warnings that didn't make sense. It gives me the impression of a product that still has some issues to resolve. 

Additionally, there are three main areas of concern:

1. The product itself seems to have some unresolved issues.
2. The integration with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem could be better. It feels standalone rather than part of an integrated solution.
3. The high level of maintenance required due to the heuristics, or lack thereof. We keep seeing the same warnings and blockages even after updates. We need to constantly be on top of it, allowing traffic repeatedly.

So, all those factors impact the overall stability. There's room for improvement, especially considering it's a newer version.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. 

It's installed on everyone's devices, so it's protecting users during working hours. Think of it as active for five days a week. We use it to its maximum capacity. 

We have around 500 end users.

We work through our supplier for support. We've shared our findings and issues, and there was some initial back-and-forth to find the root cause. There wasn't a clear, immediate answer or solution. They opened tickets with Fortinet, so it feels like the whole process is still evolving.

Neutral

We had traditional endpoint security, but this is our first EDR solution.

We didn't have any major problems during the installation while in monitoring mode. Issues arose, causing a lot of overhead, when we enabled the prevention mode and started seeing those false positives.

If we're looking strictly at the setup, there weren't any problems. I'd rate my experience with it an eight out of ten, with ten being easy and one being difficult to set up. 

The implementation itself was fine, but we experienced a lot of frustration due to the overhead of those false positives. We had to dedicate someone to constantly monitor and allow legitimate traffic. This created a negative experience with FortiEDR.

The deployment involved installing it on all our endpoint user devices. One person handled the deployment. 

We use it on the cloud. Since it's a managed service, the provider handles the systems where it's installed. We install the client on our users' devices.

We have one person dedicated to maintaining, but I'd like to have less overhead. There's too much time spent handling these findings. We'll be working with the service provider to try to reduce that.

We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it installed on every device.

We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range.

I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being expensive, and one being cheap. 

The pricing is fixed. However, we had larger configuration costs associated with the implementation.

We considered CrowdStrike and Microsoft Defender. Cost was a factor, and we were interested in the potential integration with FortiGate firewalls. However, that integration didn't work out as smoothly as expected.

Definitely have a small testing environment and not just monitor mode. Include a limited network so you can see how it reacts in full prevention mode to assess the potential impact of false positives. 

Also, if you are interested in integration with FortiGate firewalls, carefully investigate how that collaboration will be achieved.

Overall, I would rate the solution a six out of ten.

We had some customers looking for an EDR solution for their endpoint devices based on their company's security posture and standing. So Fortinet FortiEDR was recommended to them.

Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture. Our clients are happy with the solution.

The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location.

Once it was up and running, customers didn't have any complaints about the product's stability.

Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is okay, and we like the product.

I rate Fortinet FortiEDR a six out of ten for the ease of its initial setup. The engineers had some trouble setting up the solution, and they had to contact Fortinet to get some help.

Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiEDR a seven out of ten.

We are using the AirGap edition. The solution is used for threat hunting. Some things are aligned to update the database to keep up with the vulnerabilities and threats on the internet.

I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment. I can immediately stop the process. I can see which processes are running and immediately allow, stop, or reverse the damage.

The solution is not user-friendly. It is a bit hard for me. We must have the knowledge needed to find the threats using the product. We must know how to navigate and investigate using the tool. I think the usage is limited for AirGap users. We cannot use AI. Keeping up with the agent updates is a little bit difficult. Fortinet must make agent updates easier.

I run the solution on-premise. One of the VMs needs a lot of memory. It takes a lot of resources off of my VMware. I know I need resources to run threat hunting. The vendor advised me to go to the cloud. However, it's not up to me to go to the cloud. I need my CEO’s approval.

I have been using the solution for three years.

I have directly contacted the engineering staff. When I open a ticket, I can contact support immediately. The team helps me with my problems.

Positive

The solution is not expensive. However, CrowdStrike is more expensive.

CrowdStrike is much more advanced than FortiEDR. CrowdStrike is fully on the cloud and has AI features. I think it has a SOC team, too. The user interface is great. According to the reviewers, CrowdStrike is the number one tool for cybersecurity. I am evaluating CrowdStrike so that we can move to CrowdStrike in the future.

The solution provides online training that we can use to learn how to use the product. My recommendation depends on an organization's budget. However, I will recommend CrowdStrike more than Fortinet. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

It's a kind of virus defense that is looking to the future and not to the past.

The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors.

The solution is very secure compared to other vendors.

The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs, although it's a necessary trade-off. Otherwise, I have no suggestions for improvement.

Another area of improvement is support. It could be faster. 

In future releases, maybe some extra features could be added to make it better, and maybe the events and history could be made a little bit clearer.

We've been using it for four to five years now.

It is a stable solution. 

It is a scalable solution. There are around 6o end users using this solution. It is easy to scale. 

The customer service and support are quite okay. It could be better. 

Positive

I have used ESET. ESET is an old-style defense that has less problems with new programs, but it's not as secure as Fortinet.

We currently use both ESET and Fortinet. We have some places, especially for developers, that can't use FortiEDR because it's too restrictive.

Installation is straightforward.

The initial installation on the server side takes a bit of time, but if we consider the overall process, it could take about a week.

We require two people for deployment. The maintenance is easy. 

The pricing model is okay. It's not cheap, but it's not expensive either. It's a customized price. It's a yearly license. There are no extra costs. 

I would definitely recommend the solution. 

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten because but the only concerns I have are that it can sometimes have problems with new programs, and the support could be a bit faster.

We use Fortinet firewalls for perimeter security at six to seven of our locations.

It provides extreme perimeter security, especially for VPN and application profiles, and seamless security monitoring through FortiAnalyzer.

As a firewall the solution is great, we never had any issues.

We saw time to value within three to four months of the firewall deployment.

Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great.

Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR.

I have been using Fortinet FortiEDR for almost five years.

The stability is generally good. We had one problem once, but otherwise, it has been good.

I don't think Fortinet FortiEDR is scalable with other vendors and new cloud provisionings, such as Azure or other cloud providers. I need to evaluate it further.

Technical support is good, but there are sometimes problems with reachability.

Neutral

I used Check Point and Cisco firewalls in my previous companies. At my current company, we use Fortinet, which I find to be a good firewall.

The initial deployment was complex, but that is expected in any firewall environment.

We use a migrator for the implementation and they were good.

We have seen a return on investment over the past four years. We can be assured of the perimeter security system's stability and ability to sustain itself in good conditions.

I'm not familiar with pricing, but it looks a bit costly compared to other vendors.

Fortinet FortiEDR was installed before I joined my organization but it was a good choice.

I give Fortinet FortiEDR an eight out of ten.

We are looking for max solutions from vendors. We may look at VPN solutions as well.

Attending RSA is an opportunity to network and compare products from vendors around the world which are interesting.

Attending RSA gives us the opportunity to compare products and understand the latest technology. This is something that is really valuable.