Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo

Top 10 Fortinet FortiEDR Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.0 out of 5
243 followers
Post review

Top Fortinet FortiEDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortinet FortiEDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Cisco Secure Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon has an edge in pricing and customer support with a lightweight agent and ease of integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR's robust features, such as automated threat response and detailed forensic analysis, make it a preferred choice, despite higher costs and complex setup.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon setup cost is highlighted as relatively high, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its more affordable initial investment, presenting a significant difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon setup cost is highlighted as relatively high, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its more affordable initial investment, presenting a significant difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers cost-effective pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides advanced integration with Microsoft products and extensive threat detection. Fortinet FortiEDR's automation is appealing, while Defender's comprehensive security can justify its higher cost. Both have unique advantages for different buyer needs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which tends to be higher due to its extensive features.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which tends to be higher due to its extensive features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in pricing and support, offering strong endpoint protection and threat detection. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint provides a comprehensive security suite with advanced features. Fortinet is noted for easier deployment, while Cisco's superior integration and long-term value attract tech buyers seeking robust performance.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR offers competitive setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is noted for its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR offers competitive setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is noted for its higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in support and pricing, making it a good option for organizations seeking value. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with superior features, offering better functionality and advanced threat prevention, justifying its higher price.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup cost while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a more flexible pricing structure. SentinelOne's setup process is typically faster compared to Fortinet, which involves more extensive configuration but provides greater customization.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup cost while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a more flexible pricing structure. SentinelOne's setup process is typically faster compared to Fortinet, which involves more extensive configuration but provides greater customization.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in support quality and comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR has a more integrated security approach and seamless Microsoft product integration. Fortinet FortiEDR mitigates threats effectively, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers competitive pricing and substantial ROI through Microsoft infrastructure integration.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR requires a higher initial investment. FortiEDR is known for its affordability, contrasting with Defender XDR's premium price reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR requires a higher initial investment. FortiEDR is known for its affordability, contrasting with Defender XDR's premium price reflecting its comprehensive features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar excels in advanced threat intelligence and data analytics. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive endpoint protection with automated incident response. QRadar users benefit from strong customer service. FortiEDR provides quicker deployment and lower upfront costs, ideal for cost-sensitive buyers.

Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR. Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for being more cost-effective during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR. Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for being more cost-effective during implementation.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is praised for its comprehensive threat detection, automated processes, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Elastic Security excels with advanced threat hunting, flexibility, and extensive integrations. Fortinet FortiEDR offers simpler deployment and support, while Elastic Security's higher cost is justified by superior functionality.
Download Elastic Security vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, whereas Elastic Security offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, whereas Elastic Security offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is admired for automated threat detection and comprehensive threat intelligence, making it cost-effective with straightforward deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint, with advanced AI-driven features and deep learning capabilities, offers superior protection justifying its higher price despite complex setup.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is low, while Intercept X Endpoint has a higher setup cost. Fortinet offers straightforward installation, but Intercept X provides advanced customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is low, while Intercept X Endpoint has a higher setup cost. Fortinet offers straightforward installation, but Intercept X provides advanced customization options.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is appreciated for comprehensive integration and automated responses. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced threat detection and real-time remediation. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in customer service, while Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with superior features that justify its higher price.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR is more affordable initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR is more affordable initially.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is praised for its pricing, comprehensive malware protection, ease of use, and customer support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with advanced threat detection, real-time response capabilities, and higher ROI despite its higher cost, appealing to those needing robust security.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which tends to be more expensive in terms of initial deployment. Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive security features that come with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which tends to be more expensive in terms of initial deployment. Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive security features that come with higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium offers comprehensive endpoint security, real-time data visibility, and streamlined patching, appealing to those seeking a broad focus. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced threat detection, autonomous response, and lower resource consumption, making it ideal for specialized threat management.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has higher setup costs, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is more cost-effective initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has higher setup costs, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is more cost-effective initially.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in pricing and support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with its features and real-time detection. VMware impresses with a straightforward deployment process, while Fortinet's customer service is favored. VMware offers competitive costs, whereas Fortinet justifies higher pricing with added value.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more economical initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers user-friendly management and efficient threat detection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides comprehensive threat intelligence and robust automation. Check Point Harmony Endpoint ensures easy deployment and competitive pricing, while Fortinet FortiEDR impresses with advanced features and strong security, justifying its investment.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a high setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower upfront expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a high setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower upfront expense.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5


The Trend Micro Vision One platform is designed to extend threat detection and response across an organization's digital landscape. It is crafted to deliver advanced threat intelligence, using a layered approach to protect against a wide range of cyber threats.

Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trend Vision One Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in ease of use and comprehensive protection with real-time detection and automated response. In comparison, Trellix ENS offers scalable features, robust threat detection, and advanced machine learning. FortiEDR is noted for deployment simplicity, while Trellix ENS is praised for its integration and extensive support.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a low setup cost. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a low setup cost. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a higher setup cost.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat isolation and malware prevention, making it suitable for organizations seeking strong basic protection at a cost-effective price. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, justifying its higher cost with superior features and better ROI.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet impresses with its comprehensive threat detection, easy deployment, responsive customer service, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced threat hunting, provides robust customer support, and is valued for long-term benefits despite a more complex setup.
Download Cynet vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Cynet has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which has higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which has higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightIDR offers ease of use and efficient integration, making it ideal for teams prioritizing accessibility. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides robust security with fewer false positives, appealing to those needing strong threat protection. Rapid7 InsightIDR ensures smooth deployment, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR delivers advanced security capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Rapid7 InsightIDR has an affordable setup cost and robust user support, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR's setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive initial configuration services.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightIDR has an affordable setup cost and robust user support, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR's setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive initial configuration services.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in pricing, ROI, and customer service, favored for robust automation and user-friendly management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced features and granular threat detection but has more complex deployment and setup. Bitdefender's simplicity contrasts with Fortinet's detailed threat identification.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a higher initial investment. Bitdefender suits budget-conscious users, whereas FortiEDR may be preferable for those seeking comprehensive features with a higher budget allowance.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a higher initial investment. Bitdefender suits budget-conscious users, whereas FortiEDR may be preferable for those seeking comprehensive features with a higher budget allowance.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Huntress
4.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Huntress
4.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities with extensive integration options, making it versatile. In comparison, Huntress focuses on advanced threat detection and incident response with proactive alerts, simple setup, and competitive pricing, making it efficient for reducing incident response times.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Huntress Report
Fortinet FortiEDR boasts competitive setup costs, while Huntress stands out with lower initial expenses, making it a budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR boasts competitive setup costs, while Huntress stands out with lower initial expenses, making it a budget-friendly alternative.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5
Cybereason excels in pricing and ease of initial deployment, making it suitable for smaller budgets. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced automation and integration options, providing substantial ROI. Cybereason stands out in threat-hunting capabilities, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents robust automated responses.
Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a moderate setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower setup cost, making FortiEDR more cost-effective initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a moderate setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower setup cost, making FortiEDR more cost-effective initially.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers advanced threat detection and automated response capabilities, making it ideal for buyers seeking simplicity and effective automated solutions. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides comprehensive protection and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those needing extensive features despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 setups quickly with a moderate cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR may involve more significant setup expenses. Fortinet FortiEDR typically offers more robust EDR features, but users might find Panda's pricing more accessible.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 setups quickly with a moderate cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR may involve more significant setup expenses. Fortinet FortiEDR typically offers more robust EDR features, but users might find Panda's pricing more accessible.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Digital Guardian excels in data loss prevention and user-centric security measures. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for comprehensive endpoint protection and automated threat response. Digital Guardian offers detailed insights and control, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR provides advanced threat detection and superior integration.
Download Digital Guardian vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Digital Guardian has a higher upfront setup cost, requiring a larger initial investment from users. Fortinet FortiEDR, on the other hand, offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations with limited initial capital.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian has a higher upfront setup cost, requiring a larger initial investment from users. Fortinet FortiEDR, on the other hand, offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations with limited initial capital.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers robust security with efficient threat detection, real-time response, and low false-positive rate. In comparison, Datto EDR provides integrated backup solutions and extensive threat intelligence. Fortinet FortiEDR excels in easy deployment, while Datto EDR is valued for its comprehensive functionalities despite higher cost.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is more cost-effective for initial deployment. Differences in setup costs can be significant for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is more cost-effective for initial deployment. Differences in setup costs can be significant for budget-conscious organizations.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in cost-effectiveness, rapid ROI, and customer service, making it ideal for buyers seeking affordability and support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers advanced threat intelligence and machine learning, appealing to buyers prioritizing superior feature sets despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, which presents a higher expense but offers comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, which presents a higher expense but offers comprehensive features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in pricing, deployment ease, threat detection, and real-time analytics. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR's strengths lie in automated responses, endpoint protection, and integration capabilities. NetWitness prioritizes cost-effectiveness and scalability, while Fortinet's robust automation and customer support offer higher ROI despite initial costs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. NetWitness NDR Report
NetWitness NDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness NDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5

Open EDR addresses security by providing threat detection, incident investigation, and automated responses. It enhances endpoint protection with detailed monitoring. Users appreciate its real-time threat detection, easy deployment, and community support but note issues with false positives, system performance, and complex installation. They desire better reporting features and more integrations.

View comparison
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate offers advanced threat detection with a focus on network visibility and automated incident response. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels in endpoint protection and integration capabilities. Fidelis Elevate requires enhancement in data analytics, while Fortinet FortiEDR needs better cloud integration.
Download Fidelis Elevate vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fidelis Elevate has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR. Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR. Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is valued for its automation capabilities and seamless integration with other Fortinet products. In comparison, Trellix EDR stands out due to its advanced analytics and robust threat detection. Fortinet FortiEDR is easier to deploy, while Trellix EDR offers comprehensive support documentation.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is widely considered budget-friendly while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is widely considered budget-friendly while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its advanced features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in automated threat response and real-time protection, making it appealing for straightforward deployment and customer support. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers advanced detection algorithms and integration capabilities, appealing to those willing to invest in sophisticated feature sets.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has lower setup costs compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response, highlighting a crucial difference for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has lower setup costs compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response, highlighting a crucial difference for budget-conscious users.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection, real-time response, and automation, offering straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides comprehensive endpoint visibility, proactive threat hunting, and advanced investigative tools, thus delivering better ROI and detailed investigative features. Scalability is a challenge for ESET Inspect, while FortiEDR faces integration issues.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers excellent value and ease of deployment with strong automated threat detection. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response provides superior threat intelligence and integration with other Symantec products. A tech buyer might choose Fortinet for cost-effectiveness, while Symantec appeals for its comprehensive feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly for businesses, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has higher setup costs, which may be justified by its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly for businesses, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has higher setup costs, which may be justified by its advanced features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers robust real-time protection and automated response, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure excels in threat intelligence and detection mechanisms. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR integrates better with third-party tools, whereas Sangfor Endpoint Secure is more cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is relatively high, requiring significant investment, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it a more affordable option for organizations with limited resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is relatively high, requiring significant investment, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it a more affordable option for organizations with limited resources.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in pricing and support, offering comprehensive threat detection and automated response. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, appreciated for advanced features like superior threat intelligence and machine learning, justifies its higher cost for users seeking robust and effective security solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes premium security, whereas WithSecure focuses on affordability without compromising efficacy.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes premium security, whereas WithSecure focuses on affordability without compromising efficacy.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection and automated response, offering extensive security features. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is highly regarded for its seamless integration and easier management. Fortinet FortiEDR provides superior threat analysis, while WatchGuard EPDR is more user-friendly with quicker deployment.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR entails higher initial investment and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR entails higher initial investment and complexity.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CylanceOPTICS
3.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CylanceOPTICS
3.7 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in immediate response and threat detection, particularly noted for its cost-effectiveness and support. In comparison, CylanceOPTICS focuses on AI-driven prevention with superior innovative features. Tech buyers might choose Fortinet FortiEDR for pricing and support, whereas CylanceOPTICS offers advanced features worth the higher cost.
Download CylanceOPTICS vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR's setup cost is considered higher, whereas CylanceOPTICS is noted for a more budget-friendly setup cost. Customers report that CylanceOPTICS offers a cost-effective solution without compromising on essential features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR's setup cost is considered higher, whereas CylanceOPTICS is noted for a more budget-friendly setup cost. Customers report that CylanceOPTICS offers a cost-effective solution without compromising on essential features.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)