Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Harikrishnan  Ramamoorthy - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead at Netlink Software Group America Inc
Real User
It's easy to manage the solution and add new certificates to the config.
Pros and Cons
  • "We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."
  • "The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them."

What is our primary use case?

JBoss is an on-premises solution we use in a banking setting.  It is used to manage servers and applications. There are two modes: domain and development. We can monitor and control all types of deployments in JBoss.

We have around 20,000 to 30,000 users on the same application and everything is going via the JBoss. We were using JBoss 1.0 when I first installed it, but they've probably included some more security patches in the latest version. 

What is most valuable?

We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config.

What needs improvement?

The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using JBoss since I joined the company three years ago. 

Buyer's Guide
JBoss
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about JBoss. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I haven't had any complaints in production, but in development and UAT, I've noticed that some of the applications are not deployed properly, and errors need to be fixed.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used Tomcat when I worked for a cement manufacturer in India. They were a small-scale company, so we preferred Tomcat server. When I started working in finance, the bank suggested we go with JBoss. JBoss is easier to handle, and it can take on a much larger load compared to Tomcat.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up JBoss is more complex relative to Tomcat. We need to follow the set of steps because it's not like we are installing a single system. Several separate systems need to be connected using the common prompt. There will be a common for that. After generating, we need to connect with the other ID with the main deployment controller.

There is one deployment controller, and we need to connect the separate server nodes using that. I use a trial-and-error process for the JBoss installations for the development. We follow the steps and document everything. After we do it once, it's not complex the second time because we know all the steps we need to follow. 

What about the implementation team?

We don't use outside consultants. It's open source, so we do some R&D and a process of trial and error in the development environment. There is no help JBoss or a consultant. The banking team works with the development team to get it done.

What other advice do I have?

I rate JBoss seven out of 10. I would recommend Tomcat for a small-scale use case. It's easy to maintain and deploy, and the UA interface is simple. JBoss is more appropriate for large industries. Though it is complex to maintain, JBoss is well balanced and can handle larger loads.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
General Manager Sales at Taashee
Reseller
Reliable, integrates well with Java, and has flexible licenses
Pros and Cons
  • "The product integrates well with Java applications."
  • "The initial setup is a bit complex."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for business processes and mostly from the level of approval, within the organization.

What is most valuable?

The product integrates well with Java applications.

The software is basically decently placed, commercially as well as for production.

The solution is quite stable. 

It's perfect for the needed usage of the customer.

What needs improvement?

We haven't come across any missing features. 

The initial setup is a bit complex. 

I'd like the product to move more towards the cloud.

The frequent updates, and the life cycle, should be a little longer. They keep on changing versions and versions should have a longer life.

Even if the client buys an extended life cycle, they should support the customers who are loyal customers and extend all their possible support to the client when a customer is buying a subscription as well as extended life cycle support. The OEM should want to give additional extended support to the customer because.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for five or six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is very good. There are no issues with bugs or glitches. the performance is good. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. It's not locked to any specific server, so the licenses are flexible.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is okay. The support comes from the GSS, the global support center of Red Hat. The problem is that support is always via email. They do not give support via telephone. Email support takes a bit of a time, however, they do give you some sort of solution. There is no typical SLA.

How was the initial setup?

The solution is a little complex in terms of implementation. It is not a straightforward thing, as there is integration with multiple things which makes it not a straightforward implementation.

In terms of maintenance, it all depends upon the case and the departments. For one implementation unit, you need at least one person.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is flexible. It comes in a subscription model, so it doesn't actually lock to a specific server. That's one of the good things. Licensing costs vary from company to company. It depends on the requirements and size. Definitely, it is better than the proprietary cost. Everything is included under the license. there are extra fees. 

What other advice do I have?

I don't remember the version we're using, however, it'll be the latest version at that time of implementation. These are on an in-house data center.

It's pretty easy to implement from the Java perspective, however, equally challenging to integrate with other applications or different databases. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
JBoss
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about JBoss. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PalamKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Additional General Manager at India.com Ltd.
Real User
Top 20
Robust solution with good scalability
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution's technical support is good."
  • "The solution's documentation could be better."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for the installation of the hardware and microservices.

What is most valuable?

The solution is robust and provides good support.

What needs improvement?

The solution's documentation could be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for around sixteen years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the solution's stability a seven or eight. It needs improvement as we need to do the troubleshooting for some instances.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution. It supports both vertical and horizontal scaling. I rate its scalability an eight or nine.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support is good. Although, it depends on the type of support contract one has purchased.

How was the initial setup?

The solution's setup process is straightforward for me as I have prior experience using it. I rate the process an eight. It takes a day to complete a basic setup.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is an open-source solution.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution an eight. There are better solutions available, like WebLogic, with high scalability.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
Business developer manager at Ambetronics engineers Pvt ltd.
Real User
Top 20
Highly stable solution for implementing web applications
Pros and Cons
  • "JBoss has made it very easy to implement web applications."
  • "It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

I use the platform mainly for presentations and meetings. It is also used to implement web applications.

How has it helped my organization?

JBoss has made it very easy to implement web applications.

What is most valuable?

The meetings in JBoss are very easy, and we can see what's there on our laptops and mobiles. We can also comment over there.

What needs improvement?

I don't know much about these aspects. However, it would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using JBoss for around six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I do not have much insight into scalability. At present, we have around six users.

How was the initial setup?

It is easy to set up.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. I would recommend this solution to others.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1549332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Department at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Lightweight and reasonably-priced, but the support should be bundled with Red Hat support
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the UI."
  • "Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."

What is our primary use case?

JBoss is a product that we implement for our clients. It is used as an application server and a web server. 

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the UI.

This is a lightweight server.

What needs improvement?

The support should be bundled with the Red Hat OS support because as it is now, these are two separate costs. Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using JBoss for a couple of years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have not had any problems with the stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable product.

How are customer service and technical support?

Our application support team will contact JBoss support if they have an issue, but so far they have not needed to. We have not seen any major or critical problems.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also have Oracle WebLogic in the company and some of the developers prefer to use JBoss. Three or four of our applications use JBoss and the remaining ones, which is most of them, use WebLogic.

In terms of memory, it is better than Oracle WebLogic.

What about the implementation team?

Our in-house team is responsible for deployment and maintenance. We have one person from the infrastructure team to help install and tune it. A second person performs day-to-day troubleshooting on it.

Once we deliver and deploy the server, there is another team to support the application.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This price of JBoss is cheaper than similar solutions like Oracle WebLogic. We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

JBoss is what we settled on when we were searching for alternatives to WebLogic.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is that for anybody who is searching for a lightweight application or web server, JBoss is one of the options that I recommend. We plan to continue using it.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
PeerSpot user
Owner at Inventrics technologies
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
The solution's pricing could be improved, but its support is very good for repairing components
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution's support is very good for repairing components."
  • "The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."

What is our primary use case?

We provide the very basic JBoss setup for the implementation and the setup.

What is most valuable?

The solution's support is very good for repairing components. We just need to raise a case, and the support team will reply.

What needs improvement?

The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with JBoss for a couple of years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate JBoss an eight out of ten for stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Two to three of our customers are using JBoss.

I rate JBoss an eight out of ten for scalability.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup could be simple or very complex, depending on the solution.

What about the implementation team?

It takes weeks to deploy JBoss. The solution's deployment includes downloading the installer and then deploying the server.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

JBoss is an expensive solution. Customers need to pay for a yearly license for JBoss.

What other advice do I have?

One engineer is required for the deployment and maintenance of JBoss.

I would recommend users to go ahead and use JBoss.

Overall, I rate JBoss a five out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1516560 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Vendor
Reliable, scalable, and easy to use from a developer's perspective
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable."
  • "It can have automation features. Everybody is focused right now on automation. In terms of saving cost, automation is always the first thing that comes to light."

What is our primary use case?

I am working on a deal where JBoss is being renewed. It is a legacy version. The use case is around a financial institution that enables banks to do peer-to-peer transactions. Finance is the core business of the companies I'm working with.

What is most valuable?

It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable.

What needs improvement?

It can have automation features. Everybody is focused right now on automation. In terms of saving cost, automation is always the first thing that comes to light.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is pretty reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have seen big enterprises using JBoss. So, it doesn't matter what the size of the organization is. JBoss can fit regardless of the size.

In terms of the number of users, in the organization I'm working with, there are 20 developers and a couple of infrastructure guys. They have a lot of developers in this particular organization.

How are customer service and technical support?

There are no concerns in terms of support. They received support directly from Red Hat.

How was the initial setup?

It is pretty straightforward from my perspective. The deployment duration depends on what you're trying to do with this solution, but it is pretty straightforward and can be deployed in a couple of hours.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

They went for what they were comfortable with, and they weren't much interested in new solutions.

What other advice do I have?

Its recommendation depends on the vision of the organization. We need to have that understanding first before we provide them some sort of solution. It will depend on what they already have in place or what they're planning to do. Customers are moving to the cloud, and there are other alternatives out there, but of course, it will depend on understanding the journey of the customer.

I would rate JBoss an eight out of ten, just for how common it is to use Java as a language.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Senior Manager - Cloud Transformation at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
It seems to be a well-rounded application server that supports scalability and is easy to set-up and to deploy.

What is most valuable?

I have seen a few implementations where the JBoss application server is used. Initially, the applications were hosted on licensed servers like IBM WebSphere and BEA WebLogic. But, due to the license cost, we advised our client to shift to an open source application server. With open source, we had a choice of going with Apache Tomcat and JBoss. We chose JBoss as it's far more scalable, secure and comes with support from the vendor.

The server supports Windows as well as Linux OS, which is an added advantage. JBoss seems to be a well-rounded application server in the market which supports scalability and is easy to set-up and to deploy.

How has it helped my organization?

Compared to IBM and BEA, JBoss provides the best support in the virtualized environment, and it also comes with multiple configurations which help in easy roll-out of the applications.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The application deployment sometimes can be a tedious task if you are a novice.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The earlier application servers - IBM/BEA - had a very huge license cost. Moreover, the cost went up as we wanted to scale the application for more users. 

Also, the application servers comes with poor support in virtualized environment.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free JBoss Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Application Server
Buyer's Guide
Download our free JBoss Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.