Top 10 Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Alternatives

Name: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 4.1 (32 reviews)

Vendor: Red Hat

4.1 out of 5

32 reviews
96% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, and Oracle WebLogic Server. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) surpasses its competitors by offering robust cloud-native capabilities, streamlined development processes, and flexible deployment options, ensuring efficient application performance and scalability for modern enterprise applications.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

IBM WebSphere Application Server

3.9 out of 5

IBM WebSphere Application Server

3.9 out of 5

IBM WebSphere Application Server offers strong enterprise integration and advanced security, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive support. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP's open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness attract businesses prioritizing modern development and standards compliance, benefiting from its lightweight architecture and cloud readiness.

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

IBM WebSphere Application Server features complex setup costs that are typically higher, while Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM WebSphere Application Server features complex setup costs that are typically higher, while Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a more cost-effective setup.

IIS

4.1 out of 5

IIS

4.1 out of 5

IIS integrates seamlessly with Microsoft ecosystems, enhancing user experiences within Windows environments. In comparison, JBoss offers open-source flexibility with strong Java support, appealing to enterprises needing diverse platform deployment and advanced J2EE capabilities for complex solutions.

Download IIS vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

IIS setup cost is typically lower, making it a budget-friendly option, whereas Red Hat JBoss EAP involves higher initial expenses but offers robust enterprise features.

View comparison

Pricing

IIS setup cost is typically lower, making it a budget-friendly option, whereas Red Hat JBoss EAP involves higher initial expenses but offers robust enterprise features.

Oracle WebLogic Server

4.0 out of 5

Oracle WebLogic Server

4.0 out of 5

Oracle WebLogic Server excels in scalability and stability with strong integration into Oracle's ecosystem, essential for enterprises needing robust support. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP offers more flexibility with its open-source nature, making it ideal for cost-conscious businesses embracing modular, cloud-ready applications.

Download Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Oracle WebLogic Server setup costs are generally higher with more complex configurations compared to Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), which offers a more straightforward setup process with a lower initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Tomcat

4.2 out of 5

Tomcat

4.2 out of 5

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers scalability and stability for large enterprise Java applications. In comparison, Tomcat excels in simplicity and ease of use, ideal for quick setups and smaller applications. Both solutions cater to different deployment needs and budget considerations.

Download Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs. Tomcat Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP involves a more substantial initial setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while Tomcat offers a lower setup cost, making it accessible for smaller projects with fewer enterprise-level requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Open Liberty

5.0 out of 5

IBM Open Liberty

5.0 out of 5

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers strong integration and ecosystem support, making it ideal for complex enterprise solutions. In comparison, IBM Open Liberty's modular design and flexibility appeal to those seeking faster time-to-market and adaptability for scalable, cloud-native applications.

Download IBM Open Liberty vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Open Liberty, which offers a more affordable initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Open Liberty, which offers a more affordable initial expense.

Oracle Fusion Middleware

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Fusion Middleware

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat JBoss EAP is favored for its cost-effective, open-source platform with strong scalability. In comparison, Oracle Fusion Middleware excels in integration with Oracle products, offering robust capabilities for large enterprises seeking extensive integration. Tech buyers select based on affordability or comprehensive integration needs.

Download Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Fusion Middleware, highlighting a critical pricing difference that may influence budget-conscious decisions.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Fusion Middleware, highlighting a critical pricing difference that may influence budget-conscious decisions.

Oracle Application Server

3.0 out of 5

Oracle Application Server

3.0 out of 5

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform offers a cost-effective, scalable solution with a lightweight architecture. In comparison, Oracle Application Server provides a comprehensive suite with advanced security and high availability, suitable for enterprises requiring extensive capabilities and willing to invest in premium features.

Download Oracle Application Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Report

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss EAP offers a competitive setup cost, while Oracle Application Server requires a higher initial investment, highlighting the budget-friendly nature of JBoss compared to the premium entry of Oracle.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle GlassFish

3.0 out of 5

Oracle GlassFish

3.0 out of 5

GlassFish offers cost-effectiveness and flexibility, making it ideal for smaller projects. In comparison, JBoss EAP provides enterprise-grade scalability and performance. GlassFish suits small to medium enterprises, while JBoss EAP appeals to larger organizations seeking comprehensive support and superior features despite higher costs.

Pricing

Oracle GlassFish offers a competitively lower setup cost, while Red Hat JBoss EAP requires a more significant initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle GlassFish offers a competitively lower setup cost, while Red Hat JBoss EAP requires a more significant initial investment.

Caucho Resin

1 out of 5

Caucho Resin

1 out of 5

Caucho Resin offers cost-effective pricing, straightforward deployment, and performance optimization, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP provides extensive middleware solutions and advanced features, attracting those seeking scalability and extensive integration support, despite its higher cost.

Pricing

Caucho Resin has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly option, while Red Hat JBoss EAP requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive enterprise features.

View comparison

Pricing

Caucho Resin has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly option, while Red Hat JBoss EAP requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive enterprise features.

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server

1 out of 5

Fujitsu Interstage Application Server

1 out of 5

Fujitsu Interstage attracts buyers with its robust security and integration features, ideal for complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Red Hat JBoss EAP, with its modular architecture and cloud-native capabilities, appeals to organizations seeking enhanced scalability and modern cloud application performance.

Pricing

Fujitsu Interstage offers lower setup costs than Red Hat JBoss EAP, where initial expenses are notably higher. While Fujitsu provides cost-effective deployment, JBoss EAP compensates with robust features that justify the price difference for some enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 3 more products

Related categories

Application Server

Application Infrastructure