Oracle WebLogic Server and Red Hat JBoss EAP are competing in the application server category, with WebLogic often perceived as the more stable choice for enterprise environments due to its integration and performance features. However, JBoss is regarded for its cost-effectiveness and adaptability, especially in open-source settings.
Features: Oracle WebLogic Server boasts robust administration consoles and clustering capabilities, making it highly scalable and stable. It excels with features like JMS server integration and performance optimization through database tuning. Red Hat JBoss EAP, meanwhile, stands out for its open-source nature and ease of setup, offering flexibility and the ability to scale efficiently at a lower cost.
Room for Improvement: Oracle WebLogic Server can improve in areas such as integration with Oracle Enterprise Manager, updating processes, and performance diagnostics, with some users highlighting its complexity and high licensing fees. Red Hat JBoss EAP can benefit from enhanced integration capabilities, automation, and ease of deployment updates, with documentation and pricing needing refinement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle WebLogic Server users appreciate the robust support and extensive documentation, though it can be costly and time-consuming. Red Hat JBoss EAP offers simpler setup and hybrid cloud flexibility, with its cost-effective customer service being a noted strength, although response times may vary.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle WebLogic Server is recognized for high costs, justified by comprehensive features and long-term ROI. Users benefit from its efficiency but face significant financial commitments. Red Hat JBoss EAP is a more budget-friendly option, particularly for open-source and cloud deployments, offering essential support and flexibility without high costs.
This flexibility translates to a lower total cost of ownership.
I would rate customer service and support from Oracle for this product as either nine or ten.
We receive support from RDS and Red Hat, and the response time and quality meet our expectations.
I find Oracle WebLogic Server to be highly scalable, rating it as nine out of ten.
It is quite stable for our needs.
Using scripting allows for the creation of resources.
Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial.
I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console.
JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic.
The price is somewhat high for an enterprise, however, it depends on organizational negotiations.
I can expand the cluster by creating more servers and several clusters within the same domain.
Built-in metrics and subsystem isolation, where every subsystem logging, messaging, or web services can be tuned independently, provide fine-grained control over performance and behavior.
It allows for simple modification of applications and provides better clustering capabilities.
JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries.
Oracle WebLogic Server is widely used for deploying, managing, and monitoring Java-based applications. It's essential for core banking, e-commerce, insurance portals, and enterprise documentation management.
Businesses rely on Oracle WebLogic Server for its stability, performance, and scalability. The server supports the deployment of multiple applications, including SOAP backend services, integration apps, and interactive interfaces. It's also known for robust load distribution and serving applications on internet browsers. However, users encounter challenges like instability from updates, administration complexity, pricing concerns, and error handling issues.
What are the key features?Oracle WebLogic Server finds implementation in industries like fintech for hosting critical applications, insurance for managing portals, and e-commerce for performance assurance. Core banking relies on it for backend services while enterprises use it for managing documentation and ERP solutions. Its usage spans client projects needing robust backend services and interactive interfacing.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) provides scalable, secure, and reliable infrastructure for Java applications, offering high availability, modular architecture, and smooth integration with new technologies.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is tailored for deploying and managing web and application servers, with a strong focus on Java applications, APIs, and core business systems. It ensures easy setup and cost-effectiveness, accommodating high availability and clustering enhancements like session replication via Infinispan. While managing configurations and deployments effectively, EAP facilitates flexible deployment modes and enhanced security using OpenID Connect. However, areas needing improvement include customization options, runtime diagnostics, integration capabilities, documentation, and technical support. Automation needs expansion, pricing options could be more competitive, and better alignment with Jakarta EE is suggested for modernization.
What are the standout features of Red Hat JBoss EAP?Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) finds application across industries such as finance, web development, and enterprise middleware services. Its capabilities are demonstrated in managing banking transactions, supporting legacy systems, integrating with external APIs, and fulfilling enterprise needs in installation, configuration, automation, and security tasks.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.