JBoss vs Oracle WebLogic Server comparison

Red Hat and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Server category. Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Red Hat holds a 17.7% mindshare in AppS, compared to Oracle’s 25.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

JBoss

Read 27 JBoss reviews

3,298 Views
2,916 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle WebLogic Server

Read 35 Oracle WebLogic Server reviews

4,854 Views
4,307 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

JBoss

Oracle WebLogic Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Oracle WebLogic Server and JBoss compete in the enterprise application server domain. WebLogic may have the upper hand for enterprises needing advanced performance and integration features, whereas JBoss stands out in cost-effectiveness and flexibility.

Features: Oracle WebLogic Server provides robust clustering, integration with Oracle Engineered Systems, and advanced features like production redeployment and multitenancy. JBoss, on the other hand, is known for its ease of use, scalability, and reliable integration capabilities in Java-based environments.

Room for Improvement: Oracle WebLogic requires improvements in configuration simplicity, diagnostics, and administration interfaces. Concerns also exist over update stability and licensing costs. JBoss can enhance its documentation, logging features, and support for modern technologies such as REST and GraphQL, alongside integrated automation features and clustering setups improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle WebLogic primarily offers on-premise and hybrid cloud deployment with extensive documentation and 24/7 support, albeit with high costs. JBoss provides similar deployment flexibility and open-source support, favored by cost-conscious users.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle WebLogic has high licensing costs, reflective of its enterprise-grade capabilities, but offers substantial ROI when its advanced features are fully leveraged. JBoss offers a more cost-effective, open-source alternative with lower costs and satisfactory ROI for setups not needing extensive enterprise features.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss

Ranking in Application Server

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle WebLogic Server

Ranking in Application Server

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of JBoss is 17.7%, up from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 25.1%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server

Featured Reviews

Srinadh Puli

VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Automation aids installation while management consolidation needs improvement

We are currently using Ansible for Jira installations and all the management tasks. We perform some tasks manually, however, Ansible helps in automating some of these processes I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere. It allows for simple modification of…

Read full review

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability

Our organization configures Oracle WebLogic Server in such a way that a load balancer becomes available. The network requests are segregated to the Oracle WebLogic Server as the managing server and different nodes are configured. Using the product as a load balancer helps automate request transfer from one non-functional node to another functional node. Due to Oracle WebLogic Server, the endpoints remain unaffected whenever a node goes down. The clustering feature enhances our organization's performance and reliability. In our organization, the health of the Oracle WebLogic Server environment is maintained and managed using Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM). I would definitely recommend others to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The support is fast and reliable."

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"The most valuable feature is the UI."

"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"We use JBoss mainly for application deployments and application servers."

More JBoss pros

"The product's installation phase is easy."

"It's a scalable product."

"It has good integration with security features, including OWASP."

"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."

"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."

"I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server nine out of ten, possibly even ten points."

"It's a very stable solution."

"The tool's technical support is very good."

More Oracle WebLogic Server pros

Cons

"The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it. The documentation should be self-explanatory and guide users on how to utilize the tool."

"The solution's documentation could be better."

"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."

"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."

"Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial."

"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."

"The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them."

"The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."

More JBoss cons

"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."

"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."

"The quarterly updates can sometimes lead to instability depending on the configuration of systems."

"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."

"Licensing fees need improvement."

"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."

"I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched."

"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Oracle WebLogic Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"JBoss is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."

"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."

"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."

"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"It is an open-source solution."

More JBoss pricing and cost advice

"Its high expense is a significant drawback"

"The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."

"The licensing of the product is expensive"

"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server is expensive."

"As Oracle WebLogic Server is a product from Oracle, it is bound to be an expensive solution. My company needs to make annual payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product."

"It is expensive."

"My company uses a licensed version of the product, so we get Oracle's support."

"The tool's pricing is yearly."

More Oracle WebLogic Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JBoss?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?

JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic. Though I haven't done a detailed price comparison, the licensing fee is cheaper, and due to its flexibility, th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss?

They are trying to make it less heavyweight since app servers often deliver a lot of functionality. Still, if we aren't leveraging them, they can be too much for certain use cases. Making it lighte...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle WebLogic Server?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?

Sometimes, some issues don't get fixed by Oracle's technical support team, and you need to invest time to fix them by yourself. Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?

When we implemented Oracle Libre Suite, there is middleware, which is normally Oracle WebLogic. Many customers in Pakistan use Oracle WebLogic Middleware. Previously, it was our application server,...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss

Compared 32% of the time

Tomcat vs JBoss

Compared 28% of the time

IIS vs JBoss

Compared 6% of the time

TmaxSoft JEUS vs JBoss

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Fusion Middleware vs JBoss

Compared 2% of the time

More JBoss Competitors

Tomcat vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 26% of the time

Oracle Fusion Middleware vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Application Server vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 14% of the time

IIS vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 11% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle WebLogic Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JBoss

April 2025

Download JBoss product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebLogic Server

April 2025

Download Oracle WebLogic Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

WebLogic Application Server

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), a market-leading, fully certified Java EE platform, gives you a single platform to quickly develop and deploy applications. Use traditional Red Hat JBoss EAP to gain business agility with your existing applications and reduce the costs of proprietary platforms.

Red Hat

Oracle WebLogic Server is widely used for deploying, managing, and monitoring Java-based applications. It's essential for core banking, e-commerce, insurance portals, and enterprise documentation management.

Businesses rely on Oracle WebLogic Server for its stability, performance, and scalability. The server supports the deployment of multiple applications, including SOAP backend services, integration apps, and interactive interfaces. It's also known for robust load distribution and serving applications on internet browsers. However, users encounter challenges like instability from updates, administration complexity, pricing concerns, and error handling issues.

What are the key features?

Performance: Delivers high performance for demanding applications.
Stability: Offers reliable operations and automatic failover with clustering.
Scalability: Scales easily to accommodate growing user demands.
Integration: Provides comprehensive and secure integration options.
Administration: User-friendly administration with built-in dashboards.
Automation: Simplifies configuration, monitoring, and script automation.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Performance: Expect improvements in application performance.
Operational Reliability: Look for stability in application serving and uptime.
Scalability: Ensure easy scaling to match growth in demand.
Ease of Management: Simplified deployment and version management.
Security Features: Robust security for safe application interactions.

Oracle WebLogic Server finds implementation in industries like fintech for hosting critical applications, insurance for managing portals, and e-commerce for performance assurance. Core banking relies on it for backend services while enterprises use it for managing documentation and ERP solutions. Its usage spans client projects needing robust backend services and interactive interfacing.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE

Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society

Buyer's Guide

JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

April 2025

Free Report: JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.