JBoss vs Oracle WebLogic Server comparison

Red Hat and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Server category. Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Red Hat holds a 18.4% mindshare in AppS, compared to Oracle’s 25.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

JBoss

Read 27 JBoss reviews

3,672 Views
3,267 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle WebLogic Server

Read 34 Oracle WebLogic Server reviews

5,422 Views
4,853 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

JBoss

Oracle WebLogic Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Oracle WebLogic Server and JBoss compete in the enterprise application server domain. WebLogic may have the upper hand for enterprises needing advanced performance and integration features, whereas JBoss stands out in cost-effectiveness and flexibility.

Features: Oracle WebLogic Server provides robust clustering, integration with Oracle Engineered Systems, and advanced features like production redeployment and multitenancy. JBoss, on the other hand, is known for its ease of use, scalability, and reliable integration capabilities in Java-based environments.

Room for Improvement: Oracle WebLogic requires improvements in configuration simplicity, diagnostics, and administration interfaces. Concerns also exist over update stability and licensing costs. JBoss can enhance its documentation, logging features, and support for modern technologies such as REST and GraphQL, alongside integrated automation features and clustering setups improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle WebLogic primarily offers on-premise and hybrid cloud deployment with extensive documentation and 24/7 support, albeit with high costs. JBoss provides similar deployment flexibility and open-source support, favored by cost-conscious users.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle WebLogic has high licensing costs, reflective of its enterprise-grade capabilities, but offers substantial ROI when its advanced features are fully leveraged. JBoss offers a more cost-effective, open-source alternative with lower costs and satisfactory ROI for setups not needing extensive enterprise features.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss

Ranking in Application Server

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle WebLogic Server

Ranking in Application Server

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of JBoss is 18.4%, up from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 25.9%, up from 26.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server

Featured Reviews

Srinadh Puli

VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Automation aids installation while management consolidation needs improvement

We are currently using Ansible for Jira installations and all the management tasks. We perform some tasks manually, however, Ansible helps in automating some of these processes I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere. It allows for simple modification of…

Read full review

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability

Our organization configures Oracle WebLogic Server in such a way that a load balancer becomes available. The network requests are segregated to the Oracle WebLogic Server as the managing server and different nodes are configured. Using the product as a load balancer helps automate request transfer from one non-functional node to another functional node. Due to Oracle WebLogic Server, the endpoints remain unaffected whenever a node goes down. The clustering feature enhances our organization's performance and reliability. In our organization, the health of the Oracle WebLogic Server environment is maintained and managed using Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM). I would definitely recommend others to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries."

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"The solution's support is very good for repairing components."

"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The product integrates well with Java applications."

More JBoss pros

"The tool's technical support is very good."

"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."

"It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."

"We can manage every application by creating a managed server and a cluster."

"Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications."

"Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient."

"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."

"The solution works well in load balancing."

More Oracle WebLogic Server pros

Cons

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"The stability of the solution could improve with Microsoft Windows."

"Sometimes the console has a glitch."

"I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console."

"It can have automation features. Everybody is focused right now on automation. In terms of saving cost, automation is always the first thing that comes to light."

"There is not much ability inside of the solution. The world is going beyond different micro and data-type things like Microsoft Office, so we are not seeing much ability within the solution."

"Scalability is a concern because it is not online, which limits online processes. This aspect can be improved."

"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."

More JBoss cons

"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."

"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."

"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."

"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution."

"Having clearer mechanisms to directly map a database-level connection problem to the corresponding WebLogic thread would greatly enhance the administrator's convenience."

"In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually."

"The cost could always be lower."

"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."

More Oracle WebLogic Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."

"It is an open-source solution."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."

"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."

"JBoss is an expensive solution."

More JBoss pricing and cost advice

"Its high expense is a significant drawback"

"The licensing of the product is expensive"

"My company uses a licensed version of the product, so we get Oracle's support."

"The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."

"Fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"It is expensive."

"The solution's licensing is high-priced."

"The tool's pricing is yearly."

More Oracle WebLogic Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JBoss?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?

It might be yearly. I am not sure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss?

The price could be improved. Customers don't want to buy the license easily. It's nice that there is Wildfly, which is basically the same as JBoss, just without the price.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle WebLogic Server?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?

Sometimes, some issues don't get fixed by Oracle's technical support team, and you need to invest time to fix them by yourself. Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?

When we implemented Oracle Libre Suite, there is middleware, which is normally Oracle WebLogic. Many customers in Pakistan use Oracle WebLogic Middleware. Previously, it was our application server,...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss

Compared 30% of the time

Tomcat vs JBoss

Compared 29% of the time

IIS vs JBoss

Compared 6% of the time

TmaxSoft JEUS vs JBoss

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Fusion Middleware vs JBoss

Compared 2% of the time

More JBoss Competitors

Tomcat vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 26% of the time

Oracle Fusion Middleware vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Application Server vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 17% of the time

IIS vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 9% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle WebLogic Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JBoss

February 2025

Download JBoss product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebLogic Server

February 2025

Download Oracle WebLogic Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

WebLogic Application Server

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), a market-leading, fully certified Java EE platform, gives you a single platform to quickly develop and deploy applications. Use traditional Red Hat JBoss EAP to gain business agility with your existing applications and reduce the costs of proprietary platforms.

Red Hat

Oracle WebLogic Server is widely used for deploying, managing, and monitoring Java-based applications. It's essential for core banking, e-commerce, insurance portals, and enterprise documentation management.

Businesses rely on Oracle WebLogic Server for its stability, performance, and scalability. The server supports the deployment of multiple applications, including SOAP backend services, integration apps, and interactive interfaces. It's also known for robust load distribution and serving applications on internet browsers. However, users encounter challenges like instability from updates, administration complexity, pricing concerns, and error handling issues.

What are the key features?

Performance: Delivers high performance for demanding applications.
Stability: Offers reliable operations and automatic failover with clustering.
Scalability: Scales easily to accommodate growing user demands.
Integration: Provides comprehensive and secure integration options.
Administration: User-friendly administration with built-in dashboards.
Automation: Simplifies configuration, monitoring, and script automation.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Performance: Expect improvements in application performance.
Operational Reliability: Look for stability in application serving and uptime.
Scalability: Ensure easy scaling to match growth in demand.
Ease of Management: Simplified deployment and version management.
Security Features: Robust security for safe application interactions.

Oracle WebLogic Server finds implementation in industries like fintech for hosting critical applications, insurance for managing portals, and e-commerce for performance assurance. Core banking relies on it for backend services while enterprises use it for managing documentation and ERP solutions. Its usage spans client projects needing robust backend services and interactive interfacing.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE

Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society

Buyer's Guide

JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

January 2025

Free Report: JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.