We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has flexibility and stability."
"JBoss is a scalable tool."
"The high availability is great."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the UI."
"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."
"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"What I like best about Oracle WebLogic Server is its integration with other software."
"The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"It's a very stable solution."
"We've got the support we require. If ever there is an issue, can just call on Oracle and they will assist us."
"It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"It has good integration with security features, including OWASP."
"It can have automation features. Everybody is focused right now on automation. In terms of saving cost, automation is always the first thing that comes to light."
"The solution's documentation could be better."
"There is not much ability inside of the solution. The world is going beyond different micro and data-type things like Microsoft Office, so we are not seeing much ability within the solution."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product could be made cheaper."
"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."
"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."
"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Managing and monitoring the WebLogic server environment has been challenging because most monitoring tools don't support it."
"The ticket-raising process is very time-consuming"
"Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the customer, which is why they take time to resolve issues."
"The tool's implementation should be easier. The product is also expensive."
"There's a bug related to the managed services."
"The integration could be improved."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."
JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 24 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, Oracle GlassFish and TmaxSoft JEUS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
