JBoss vs Oracle GlassFish comparison

"The support is fast and reliable."

"The tool's most beneficial feature is its scalability. People with limited technical knowledge can quickly grasp its functions with a brief introduction. The tool's ease of use makes it a plug-and-play solution, reducing the effort required to train users on its usage."

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The most valuable feature is the UI."

"The most valuable thing about JBoss is how easy it is to install and manage it on-premise, making the process simple."

"The greatest benefit of JBoss is that it was procured by IBM, thereby offering exceptional support for our banking operations."

"JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries."

"The products offers EE support."

"In terms of monitoring, the old version was somewhat limited in flexibility, lacking the ability to easily adjust configurations."

"Logging-related issues in JBoss require improvement."

"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."

"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."

"There is not much ability inside of the solution. The world is going beyond different micro and data-type things like Microsoft Office, so we are not seeing much ability within the solution."

"The solution's documentation could be better."

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."

"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."

"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."

"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."

"It is an open-source solution."