JBoss vs Oracle GlassFish comparison

"It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable."

"JBoss has made it very easy to implement web applications."

"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."

"JBoss is a scalable tool."

"The high availability is great."

"The stability is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"The solution has flexibility and stability."

"The stability is great."

"The products offers EE support."

"In terms of monitoring, the old version was somewhat limited in flexibility, lacking the ability to easily adjust configurations."

"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."

"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."

"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."

"The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it. The documentation should be self-explanatory and guide users on how to utilize the tool."

"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."

"The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them."

"The solution's documentation could be better."

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"JBoss is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."

"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."

"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."

"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."

"It is an open-source solution."