JBoss vs Oracle Fusion Middleware comparison

Red Hat and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Server category. Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Red Hat holds a 17.7% mindshare in AppS, compared to Oracle’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

JBoss

Read 27 JBoss reviews

3,298 Views
2,916 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Read 15 Oracle Fusion Middleware reviews

1,710 Views
858 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

JBoss

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

JBoss and Oracle Fusion Middleware compete in the enterprise application server market. JBoss appears to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, while Oracle Fusion Middleware offers more comprehensive integration with Oracle products.

Features: JBoss provides high availability, scalability, and cost-effective implementation. It offers flexibility, easy setup, and efficient deployment with robust support from Red Hat. Oracle Fusion Middleware provides comprehensive integration, especially with Oracle products, numerous adapters, and strong service-oriented architecture capabilities.

Room for Improvement: JBoss needs modernization in service exposure technologies and improvements in logging and documentation. Console glitches and support bundling are additional concerns. Oracle Fusion Middleware requires enhanced SOA component flexibility, improved third-party application integration, and better documentation for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JBoss mainly supports on-premises deployments but lacks hybrid or cloud options where Oracle Fusion Middleware excels. JBoss's cost-effective support is balanced by slow response times, and Oracle struggles with costly support and slow responses.

Pricing and ROI: JBoss is generally more affordable with a competitive licensing model, offering favorable ROI in larger implementations. Oracle Fusion Middleware, though costly, is suitable for larger enterprises due to its extensive features, making it a stronger choice for comprehensive enterprise support and integration.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss

Ranking in Application Server

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Ranking in Application Server

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of JBoss is 17.7%, up from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Fusion Middleware is 5.8%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server

Featured Reviews

Srinadh Puli

VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Automation aids installation while management consolidation needs improvement

We are currently using Ansible for Jira installations and all the management tasks. We perform some tasks manually, however, Ansible helps in automating some of these processes I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere. It allows for simple modification of…

Read full review

Sai Kri

Assistant Manager Business Applications at NMC Healthcare

Migration to a modern interface enhances AI integration and cloud capabilities

Presently, Oracle recommends migrating to Oracle Fusion since it's a hot product now. e-Business Suite may soon be sunsetted and has an outdated UI, with few upgrades. In contrast, Oracle Fusion offers modern features, such as AI, cloud-based applications, and customization options like Redwood features. Oracle Fusion AI chatbots are embedded, benefiting projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"JBoss's configuration is straightforward and easy."

"The stability is great."

"The most valuable thing about JBoss is how easy it is to install and manage it on-premise, making the process simple."

"JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries."

"The most valuable feature is the UI."

"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."

More JBoss pros

"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."

"Oracle Fusion is stable."

"Oracle recommends moving to Oracle Fusion as they are constantly releasing new AI, modern, web-based, and cloud-based features with updated UI. With Redwood customization and AI chatbots embedded, Oracle Fusion stands ahead of older systems."

"The most valuable feature is the structure of the product. We use Oracle Fusion Middleware to manage the Oracle database. Registered users can go to each product if sign-on credentials match each user's identical framework."

"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"The most valuable features are the pre-built connectors between Oracle applications, which allow quick integration. I also appreciate the fast deployment of components. Oracle Fusion Middleware's key benefit is enabling real-time data transfer between applications."

"Data integrity."

"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."

More Oracle Fusion Middleware pros

Cons

"It can have automation features. Everybody is focused right now on automation. In terms of saving cost, automation is always the first thing that comes to light."

"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."

"In terms of monitoring, the old version was somewhat limited in flexibility, lacking the ability to easily adjust configurations."

"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."

"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."

"I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console."

"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."

"They are trying to make it less heavyweight since app servers often deliver a lot of functionality. Still, if we aren't leveraging them, they can be too much for certain use cases."

More JBoss cons

"The price could always be better."

"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."

"Technical support should resolve issues more quickly."

"Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them."

"The solution's technical support needs to be improved."

"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."

"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."

"Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them."

More Oracle Fusion Middleware cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."

"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."

"It is an open-source solution."

"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."

"JBoss is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."

More JBoss pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive so pricing is rated a six out of ten."

"The pricing is moderate. It's fine."

"The tool is best suited for large companies due to high licensing costs."

"It is expensive. We are looking for a cheaper solution."

"My advice is to buy the basic modules first, gain the most benefit from them, then buy the advanced modules."

"The solution is quite expensive so is only used by larger organizations."

"We pay annually for the solution."

"The licensing costs are reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

48%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JBoss?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?

JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic. Though I haven't done a detailed price comparison, the licensing fee is cheaper, and due to its flexibility, th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss?

They are trying to make it less heavyweight since app servers often deliver a lot of functionality. Still, if we aren't leveraging them, they can be too much for certain use cases. Making it lighte...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Fusion Middleware?

The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Fusion Middleware?

Pricing varies from customer to customer, however, it is reasonable compared to other products in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Fusion Middleware?

Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them. Although Oracle provides support, I need the appropriate IT team to adopt these new features.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss

Compared 32% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs JBoss

Compared 28% of the time

Tomcat vs JBoss

Compared 28% of the time

IIS vs JBoss

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle GlassFish vs JBoss

Compared 1% of the time

More JBoss Competitors

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 80% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 7% of the time

Tomcat vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Fusion Middleware Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JBoss

April 2025

Download JBoss product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Fusion Middleware

March 2025

Download Oracle Fusion Middleware product report

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), a market-leading, fully certified Java EE platform, gives you a single platform to quickly develop and deploy applications. Use traditional Red Hat JBoss EAP to gain business agility with your existing applications and reduce the costs of proprietary platforms.

Red Hat

Oracle Fusion Middleware is the digital business platform for the enterprise and the cloud. It enables enterprises to create and run agile, intelligent business applications while maximizing IT efficiency through full utilization of modern hardware and software architectures.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE

Police Department of Izmir City

Buyer's Guide

JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware

April 2025

Free Report: JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.