Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them. Although Oracle provides support, I need the appropriate IT team to adopt these new features.
For improvements, I think Oracle Fusion Middleware could be better at connecting to third-party applications. While it works well with Oracle products, it's more limited to non-Oracle systems than other middleware solutions like MuleSoft.
Enterprise Resources Planning Specialist at Doyensys
Real User
Top 5
2024-09-02T05:58:00Z
Sep 2, 2024
We have four methods, namely, identify by property, anchor, image, and index. For Oracle Fusion Middleware's testing instance, we are trying all the objects with the help of the index. From the Tosca perspective, we need to use the index only in rare cases. We are continuously using the index, but we need to automate with the help of the properties alone and not with the index. My team is automating with the help of the index, which is the main issue we are facing right now. We have created a ticket, and the support team is also trying to resolve it, but it has not yet been resolved. The solution's technical support needs to be improved.
Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications. This includes providing greater flexibility in integrating entities with custom applications, ensuring seamless access to reports, and delivering detailed information tailored to each entity's specific business needs. Additionally, the addition of more data management features would be beneficial.
Application developer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2023-03-09T17:43:50Z
Mar 9, 2023
One thing that I would like to see is if this product can be containerized. We are moving away from virtual servers and moving more towards containerization to be able to quickly set up environments or have the flexibility of scaling them. It would be good if it can be containerized, and it works well in containerized platforms. Other than that, the product itself isn't bad. When you implement any of such products, it takes time for the resources to acquire skills and knowledge to make it a better implementation. Overall, it's a good product.
The documentation might not be good enough for new users. You will sometimes experience hardships in accomplishing implementations because you don't yet have a grasp of the solution. Once you understand deployments, then implementations are easy with no real problems. Deployments for other vendors could be easier. The solution handles Oracle to Oracle very well, but needs to improve for vendors like Microsoft. Our last deployment with another vendor was a headache.
IT Manager at a construction company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2021-11-04T00:40:08Z
Nov 4, 2021
Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector.
General Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 1-10 employees
Real User
2020-10-11T08:58:08Z
Oct 11, 2020
Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker.
Expert Security Access Services Administrator at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-03-12T07:26:00Z
Mar 12, 2019
The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed. This product trusts the system or itself, that it helps provision attributes to the department of its system, but if there's an error, it puts the values to the Chi table and doesn't delete it. There must be a fulfillment page. If the part of the system has an error, it must delete the attribute from the Chi table also. The problem is, when you open the product, it saves the user's attributes as part of its system but when you look at the target system, there are no attributes about that count. There must be an improved fulfillment page. Maybe the connector structure of the product must be changed in that way to meet these requirements. In summary: easier, more close, and a stable graphical user interface, which was written with new technology. It would be nice if they develop these features in the near future.
Oracle Fusion Middleware is the digital business platform for the enterprise and the cloud. It enables enterprises to create and run agile, intelligent business applications while maximizing IT efficiency through full utilization of modern hardware and software architectures.
Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them. Although Oracle provides support, I need the appropriate IT team to adopt these new features.
For improvements, I think Oracle Fusion Middleware could be better at connecting to third-party applications. While it works well with Oracle products, it's more limited to non-Oracle systems than other middleware solutions like MuleSoft.
We have four methods, namely, identify by property, anchor, image, and index. For Oracle Fusion Middleware's testing instance, we are trying all the objects with the help of the index. From the Tosca perspective, we need to use the index only in rare cases. We are continuously using the index, but we need to automate with the help of the properties alone and not with the index. My team is automating with the help of the index, which is the main issue we are facing right now. We have created a ticket, and the support team is also trying to resolve it, but it has not yet been resolved. The solution's technical support needs to be improved.
Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications. This includes providing greater flexibility in integrating entities with custom applications, ensuring seamless access to reports, and delivering detailed information tailored to each entity's specific business needs. Additionally, the addition of more data management features would be beneficial.
The product should improve BPEL features.
One thing that I would like to see is if this product can be containerized. We are moving away from virtual servers and moving more towards containerization to be able to quickly set up environments or have the flexibility of scaling them. It would be good if it can be containerized, and it works well in containerized platforms. Other than that, the product itself isn't bad. When you implement any of such products, it takes time for the resources to acquire skills and knowledge to make it a better implementation. Overall, it's a good product.
The documentation might not be good enough for new users. You will sometimes experience hardships in accomplishing implementations because you don't yet have a grasp of the solution. Once you understand deployments, then implementations are easy with no real problems. Deployments for other vendors could be easier. The solution handles Oracle to Oracle very well, but needs to improve for vendors like Microsoft. Our last deployment with another vendor was a headache.
Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector.
Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker.
The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed. This product trusts the system or itself, that it helps provision attributes to the department of its system, but if there's an error, it puts the values to the Chi table and doesn't delete it. There must be a fulfillment page. If the part of the system has an error, it must delete the attribute from the Chi table also. The problem is, when you open the product, it saves the user's attributes as part of its system but when you look at the target system, there are no attributes about that count. There must be an improved fulfillment page. Maybe the connector structure of the product must be changed in that way to meet these requirements. In summary: easier, more close, and a stable graphical user interface, which was written with new technology. It would be nice if they develop these features in the near future.