We primarily use the solution as a WiFi controller.
DevOps System Engineer at Monash University
Scalable with good monitoring and good stability
Pros and Cons
- "The installation process is nice and easy."
- "We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The solution is very stable.
There are good monitoring capabilities on offer.
We have found that the solution is quite scalable.
The installation process is nice and easy.
Its cloud machine has AI and machine learning, and therefore, it can help ensure IT has good monitoring and quicker response time as well as good troubleshooting capabilities.
What needs improvement?
We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been dealing with the solution for eight years.
Buyer's Guide
Wireless LAN
November 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have found the solution to be stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is quite scalable. There are no limitations at all.
We have five to ten different companies that use the solution and they are all different sizes.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service is okay. Mostly the client deals with it if they run into issues.
How was the initial setup?
The installation process is not overly difficult or very complex. It's nice and simple and we found it to be a straightforward process. It only took five minutes to get it up and running. I've very fast to set up.
What about the implementation team?
I've handled the implementation myself. I didn't need a consultant or anyone else to assist me.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution costs a bit too much. We would like it to be less.
Users need to pay a yearly licensing fee.
What other advice do I have?
We are Juniper partners.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very pleased with its capabilities so far.
I would recommend it to others to use. The technology is fantastic.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Senior IT Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Do a proof of concept to make sure you like the product then go for it
What is most valuable?
The Scalability it has has to add up to 256 Wireless Access Points for future expansion.
How has it helped my organization?
Allows end users to roam the office and be productive wireless without being plugged into an Ethernet cable
For how long have I used the solution?
Juniper WLC880R - one year
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No deployment has issues everything went great
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No as long as you upgrade to current software release from Juniper
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No as it can handle 256 wireless access points
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
10 out of 10
Technical Support:10 out of 10 as they stay with you until they fix the problem
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No previous solution used.
How was the initial setup?
Straightforward
What about the implementation team?
Through vendor team very professional consultants and very knowledgeable about the product.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was not part of the choosing of the product.
What other advice do I have?
Do a proof of concept to make sure you like the product then go for it.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Wireless LAN
November 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
QA Engineer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Start small then grow
Valuable Features
- Ranagement Flexibility - RingMaster (8/10)
- Virtualisation of Infrastructure (WLCv case)
- Controllers (9/10)
Room for Improvement
WLCv was a product at the being of its evolution, so there was room for improvement there.
Use of Solution
2 years.
Deployment Issues
No issues encountered.
Stability Issues
No issues encountered.
Scalability Issues
I've never executed scalability tests, but others did and there were no big issues there.
Customer Service and Technical Support
Very good. They have very experienced engineers on the site I worked on.
Initial Setup
The initial setups are pretty straightforward. They have good enough installation user guides.
Implementation Team
In-house.
Other Advice
Start with a small implementation and if it suits the needs for the business, then go for larger deployments.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Provides a sound Wi-Fi infrastructure
What is most valuable?
- Client load balancing
- Multiple SSID support
How has it helped my organization?
Provides reliable and effective Wi-Fi to our clients and it is very scalable for high density installations.
For how long have I used the solution?
Two years. (WLA522 AP)
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Deployment in conjunction with WLC and ringmaster caused no issues.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues with scalability.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Changed solution as the demand for Wi-Fi grew.
What about the implementation team?
Set-up was was in conjunction with third-party vendor and it was fairly straightforward.
What was our ROI?
High.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
As always other options were looked at during the initial phases of the project.
What other advice do I have?
- Suited our needs
- Fairly straightforward to set up
- Provides a sound Wi-Fi infrastructure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Wireless LAN Report and find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and more!
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Wireless LANPopular Comparisons
Aruba Wireless
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Cisco Wireless
Ruckus Wireless
Mist AI and Cloud
Aruba Instant On Access Points
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Wireless LAN Report and find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and more!
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Wireless LANs, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cisco Wireless Aironet 3802i vs. ALE OmniAccess Stellar AP1230. Which one is the best for the industry?
- What is the best high-performance Wireless LAN device?
- What are advantages and disadvantages of wired vs. wireless networks for a business?
- What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
- What gateway do you recommend choosing for a company with 200 employees?
- How to test the speed of a wireless network?
- Where can I find a report of the top-rated Wireless LAN vendors?
- Does Cisco wireless access points support LDAP/AD authentication?
- What is your experience with 802.1X when using EnGenius WAP/switch with Cisco ISE 2.1?