Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Juniper WLC Series comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while Juniper is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.4. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 0.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Read 31 Aruba Instant On Access Points reviews

2,380 Views
1,169 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Juniper WLC Series

Read 12 Juniper WLC Series reviews

1,038 Views
1,155 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Juniper WLC Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Juniper WLC Series and Aruba Instant On Access Points compete in the wireless management solutions category. Based on the comparison, Aruba Instant On Access Points appear to have the upper hand due to their ease of management, superior antenna technology, and cost-efficiency.

Features: Juniper WLC Series provides robust management flexibility and virtualization, supporting up to 256 wireless access points. It features an open API, strong programmability, and AI-driven features, combined with straightforward setup and stable coverage. Aruba Instant On Access Points are recognized for ease of management, superior coverage with 4x4 antenna technology, and cloud-based management. They feature a Virtual Controller, eliminating the need for separate controllers, with user-friendly integration and reliable performance.

Room for Improvement: Juniper WLC Series requires better portal functionality, WPA3 support, and improved traffic monitoring. Users also seek better integration with other products and reduced costs. Aruba Instant On Access Points could enhance monitoring capabilities and documentation. Users desire better integration and more scalability, with feedback on improving security and range, alongside pricing concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper WLC Series deployment is primarily on-premises, supported by responsive technical support and extensive documentation, though post-development support has impacted availability. Aruba Instant On Access Points offer both on-premises and cloud deployment, with highly rated technical support and consistent customer service. The Aruba app enhances remote management and notifications.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper WLC Series, while expensive, is valued for administration cost savings and solid ROI despite high complexity and licensing fees. Aruba Instant On Access Points provide a cost-effective solution with no mandatory licensing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Although considered pricier than brands like Ubiquiti, their absence of additional costs for features makes them competitive for small to midsize deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper WLC Series Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper WLC Series

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper WLC Series

Ranking in Wireless LAN

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Access Points is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper WLC Series is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Quintero

Infrastructure/Telcom Coordinator at Schnellecke Group AG & Co. KG

Affordable and offers an easy setup phase

I was working on the on-premises solutions, like IronNet, Aironet, and some other tools from Cisco, but not with Meraki. The last Aironet model that we have here in Mexico, in the corporate office, and in some of the other regions of Mexico is Cisco Aironet 3700 and Cisco Aironet 3800, so it is just two or three devices. Aruba Instant On Access Points was working with Aruba 2540 and Cisco 3850 In Cisco, I found some issues. I was working well with a vendor. I was working with Cisco Catalyst 9200 and Cisco Catalyst 9300, along with Cisco Catalyst 2916M XL Switch. With all devices, we got a report. During the immigration, we choose another vendor, which Aruba. We have some issues with Aruba Instant On Access Points in iOS that are targeting the devices, and I have seen some problems with the DHCP solution.

Read full review

Matilda Elwell

Technical Team Leader - Network &Security at STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

Offers visibility and cost benefits

The tool has given us more visibility, but I'm not very technical, so I can't comment on specific features. However, the diagnostic tools for identifying system issues have greatly improved, which we appreciate. We still use Cisco ICE for authentication on the Juniper network, as we did before. We've seen cost benefits with the Juniper WLC Series, which was a key factor in our decision-making during the proof of concept. Besides cost improvements, we've also noticed better resolution of issues and faults in our help desk, thanks to the enhanced features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Aruba Instant On Access Points are almost enterprise-level equipment but designed for end users who might not have an IT specialist on staff. They can be used in scenarios similar to those in enterprises. The security features, like easily deploying with RADIUS and dot1x, are efficient and satisfactory, providing enterprise-class security. The solution is future-proof and adapts well to changing connectivity needs. It is easy to extend the network, although there are some limitations. For large buildings, you can separate the network into floors or areas, each containing up to fifty access points, and give them one SSID and password. There might be a small gap when switching between sites, but overall, it can be extended effectively."

"It's a good solution and a good technology."

"The product is easy to set up, providing value for time since it is very quick."

"The configuration is very simple."

"The virtual Controller feature is valuable."

"The solution is scalable."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The virtual controller feature is very beneficial because it removes the need for a physical controller."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pros

"It is a very stable solution."

"It prevents a large number of unauthorized modifications of access point devices."

"The Artificial Intelligence on offer is very useful."

"The installation process is very easy."

"The tool has given us more visibility, but I'm not very technical, so I can't comment on specific features. However, the diagnostic tools for identifying system issues have greatly improved, which we appreciate. We still use Cisco ICE for authentication on the Juniper network, as we did before. We've seen cost benefits with the Juniper WLC Series, which was a key factor in our decision-making during the proof of concept. Besides cost improvements, we've also noticed better resolution of issues and faults in our help desk, thanks to the enhanced features."

"The installation process is nice and easy."

"There weren't any scalability issues, the product did what it had to do."

"Juniper WLC Series is a very high-performance device designed for indoor wireless deployment."

More Juniper WLC Series pros

Cons

"When there are a lot of people connected, especially during video streaming demonstrations, the connection can get a bit choppy."

"The product's machine or equipment can cater to around 20 connections and cannot go beyond 50 simultaneous connections, because of which I think the tool's scalability is limited."

"The security aspect needs improvement."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the validation process, especially for customers facing compliance issues when managing access points from the cloud. It would be beneficial if the access points could also be managed from an on-premises controller. Regarding additional features, customers express interest in enhancing the controller, specifically improving the capability to manage a higher number of access points from the same controller. This feature is crucial for better scalability. Another feature that customers would appreciate is the ability to increase the number of access points. However, the current process for obtaining this permission can be time-consuming, and customers would like to see improvements in this regard."

"The customer service and support are terrible."

"The Unifi Controller is slower compared to other options like Aruba."

"In future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial."

"The solution's range could be better."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points cons

"Juniper WLC Series has certain shortcomings in traffic monitoring."

"The solution should create configuration documentation."

"The solution could offer more integration with other products."

"There could be a high level of security."

"The biggest issue was that Juniper stopped developing, so we had to look for another solution."

"The support on offer to other vendors switching - like Aruba or Ruckus - could be improved."

"There could be more information from the controller, and it could be easier to work with the controller lights. It's not easy to bring up the upgrades."

"We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive."

More Juniper WLC Series cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is competitively priced. It was at a price point that made sense for me to put in my home, and that says something. The cost of the solution includes everything we need to manage and upgrade our Wi-Fi network, including the mobile management app. Having the licensing and all the functionality built into the base price of the product is really important for me. There are no extra costs for the security feature or automatic software/firmware updates, which is really important to me."

"Its price is fair. It is not really cheap, and it is also not expensive. It is in the middle."

"You buy it for $165 an AP, which is what we paid."

"Aruba Instant On Access Points are license-free. It's a very good and cheap solution for wireless networks. It can be compared with solutions from Ubiquiti and TP-Link, but it is in a different class. Aruba Instant On Access Points are cheaper than those from Cisco, Ruckus, and Motorola. It's perhaps the cheapest one. They do not use licenses, so it is a solution from the box. You don't need to pay extra money or deal with hidden payments."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It's a cost-effective solution."

"The price of Aruba Instant On Access Points is reasonable. They are competitively priced. I've even used it in my home at one time because of the low price."

"It is expensive."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost is quite high, but considering it's an enterprise solution, the complexity justifies the price."

"Juniper WLC Series is a bit pricey but worth its cost."

"There is a certain amount that needs to be paid towards the licensing charges associated with the product, but though I am not sure, I feel the licenses that we have in our company are for three years."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"The product is relatively affordable for enterprise companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

63%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Access Points?

It's really easy to set up. And, you don't have to pay for the cloud solution. That's really interesting for our clients. And the other thing is, the roaming is also quite good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Access Points?

Aruba Instant On Access Points work without a list price, suggesting that they are open source and no additional licensing costs are incurred.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Access Points?

All features already exist in Aruba Instant On Access Points. However, in future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial.

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper WLC Series?

Juniper WLC Series is a very high-performance device designed for indoor wireless deployment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper WLC Series?

The network coverage of Juniper WLC Series and Cisco is different. We need to add additional access points.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Juniper WLC Series?

Our main uses include corporate connectivity for our 4,500 staff, guest access, Wi-Fi for about 20 public libraries, partner Wi-Fi, gov Wi-Fi for government organizations, and Eduroam for the educa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 12% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

More Aruba Instant On Access Points Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 44% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 29% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 21% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 6% of the time

More Juniper WLC Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points

January 2025

Download Aruba Instant On Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Wireless LAN

December 2024

Download Juniper WLC Series product report

Also Known As

No data available

Juniper WLAN

Learn More

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Juniper

Overview

Ingredients for success.

Fast 802.11ac Wave 2, secure employee and guest access, easy-to-use web, and mobile app management.

Say yes to secure Wi-Fi access.

Pre-built access control lists (ACLs) and built-in firewall in the access points prevent malicious traffic from entering your network – we call it “hassle-free” security.

Never drop an important call.

With Instant On, voice and video business applications are automatically prioritized, so you stay connected with your peers.

WLC Series Wireless LAN Controllers deliver and manage wireless local area networks with the highest level of reliability, performance, security, and management in the industry. They integrate secure, wireless LANs with any size wired infrastructures, from small branch offices to the largest enterprise or university campus.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BAS Group, Borealis, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Jan Yperman Hospital, Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, MercaSID, S.A., NHTV Breda University, Parklands College and Christopher Robin Pre-Primary, San Antonio Community Hospital, Sandia National Laboratories, Springfield Public Schools (SPS), St. Catherine University, TalkTalk, The Education Village, University of Copenhagen, University of the Highlands and Islands, University of the West of Scotland (UWS), Valdosta State University, Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec), zulily

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper WLC Series

January 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper WLC Series

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper WLC Series and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper WLC Series report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.