Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN comparison

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Aruba Instant On Access Points both compete in the cloud-managed wireless LAN category. Cisco Meraki seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive dashboard and extensive features, while Aruba Instant On is notable for its ease of deployment.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized control with a robust dashboard ideal for both small and large organizations. It provides traffic analytics and remote management for efficient monitoring. The ease of managing networks via a cloud interface is a significant advantage. Aruba Instant On stands out with app-based provisioning and user-friendly initial setup. It also integrates well with existing systems and provides reliable coverage for small to medium-sized environments.

Room for Improvement:Cisco Meraki's licensing model can be a drawback, as devices may stop working if the license expires. Users suggest faster support response times and a need for more advanced enterprise features. Aruba Instant On could benefit from enhanced analytical capabilities in its management interface and better performance under heavy network load, particularly in high-traffic areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki's solution is flexible for deployment across different cloud environments, with praised customer service, though assistance quality can vary. Aruba Instant On focuses on straightforward on-premises setups with praised installation simplicity and prompt technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is perceived as expensive with its licensing and hardware costs, compensated by its robust features and performance leading to reduced operational expenses for some. Aruba Instant On offers a one-time purchase model without additional licensing fees, appealing to budget-conscious users looking for sufficient performance in smaller setups.