Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are major competitors in the wireless networking domain. While Cisco Meraki is favored for its pricing and support, Juniper Mist's advanced features often make it more appealing, justifying its higher price.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers robust security features, seamless cloud integration, and user-friendly management. Juniper Mist stands out with AI-driven insights, automation capabilities, and enhanced scalability. These advanced features of Juniper Mist result in improved performance levels.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki can improve in analytics, customization, and detailed reporting. Juniper Mist users encounter reliability issues, especially during high traffic, and sometimes find it lacking robustness under peak conditions. Attention to these areas could enhance user satisfaction and reliability across networks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki is known for its easy deployment process and responsive support. Despite its AI-driven automation, Juniper Mist sometimes receives feedback about less prompt customer service compared to Cisco Meraki. Users value the straightforward deployment that both products offer.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is recognized for moderate setup costs and satisfactory ROI, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. Although Juniper Mist comes with a higher initial cost, users report substantial ROI due to its advanced capabilities and operational efficiencies, making it a worthwhile investment for those prioritizing cutting-edge technology.
It's built for larger environments.
Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.
It's a cloud solution with Mist, which helps troubleshoot and provides visibility to look at different access points.
Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
