Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mist AI and Cloud comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Juniper is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Cisco holds a 13.0% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 118 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

16,460 Views
13,308 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mist AI and Cloud

Read 22 Mist AI and Cloud reviews

4,890 Views
3,335 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Mist AI and Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud compete in the advanced wireless solutions category. Cisco Meraki seems to have the upper hand in ease of use and integration, while Mist AI is favored for its innovative AI-driven features.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized cloud management with comprehensive network visibility and seamless integration with other Meraki products. Users appreciate the dashboard's smooth experience and robust security. Mist AI and Cloud provide AI-driven functionalities with automation and detailed analytics. Its open APIs enable integration with various tools, and features like Marvis enhance troubleshooting.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki users desire more advanced configuration options and improved pricing models. The restrictive licensing, lack of technical flexibility, and need for better support and compliance are concerns. Mist AI faces criticism for high costs and a lack of language support. Users also report integration challenges, documentation gaps, and seek enhancements in hardware pricing and multi-vendor compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki and Mist AI have flexible deployment options. Cisco Meraki is praised for its intuitive dashboard aiding deployment in hybrid environments; however, its technical support varies. Mist AI is noted for straightforward deployment in cloud settings and efficient customer service, although service costs and accessibility can vary by region.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is considered expensive, with its licensing model requiring proactive management. Users find value in its feature set and long-term savings on staffing and support, seeing ROI mainly in operational efficiency. Mist AI is also seen as costly but justified by AI-driven benefits. Pricing is competitive yet significant, with favorable ROI in some regions, supported by AI advancements and operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

118

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mist AI and Cloud

Ranking in Wireless LAN

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 13.0%, up from 12.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mist AI and Cloud is 2.4%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Q&A Highlights

Chuck Serauskas

Network and Telecommunications Manager at Kwik Trip

Jun 02, 2022

Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Had so many problems with Meraki in the past 5 years. I wouldn't recommend them to anybody. The last problem was intermittent problems connecting to an SSID, the helpdesk answer was: "make the password less complex". It was passw0rd. Roaming always seems to break whenever they do an update. One time it took more than a year to fix the issues, couldn't upgrade the firmware for more than a year. Every time I reported a problem, they wanted to upgrade our firmware, but they hadn't fixed the roaming problem. Wifi works so much better now when we moved away from Meraki. Plus, we don't have to pay the license fee anymore.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Mageshwaran S

Solution Architect at Bharti Airtel ·

Enables organizations to control many sites globally with a lean IT team and provides visibility into the user activities

The solution can handle only medium and small businesses. We face a bottleneck on the gateway while using the solution for large enterprises. The solution must be able to expand to larger enterprises. Currently, the MX device can support only up to 10,000 users. It would be good if it can go beyond 1 lakh users. Catalyst 9300 is coming on the Meraki Dashboard. The vendor must also bring in the 9400 and 9600 Catalyst series. It will be very helpful. We will not have any choke on the gateway. There is no active-active concept. It will be very helpful if the solution provides active-active. Now, we are doing an active-passive setup, which is a warm spare. If it is an active-active setup, the gateway bottleneck issue can be resolved. I would be able to segment the Wireless LAN IPs. It will help support 20,000 devices at a go. Meraki does not have a single dashboard. I need to port an on-premise controller. There is a bottleneck while scaling the product. I need to consider a lot of things.

Read full review

ALEXANDRE VIANNA

CTO at Redeswirelessbrasil

Scalable and AI-driven automation helps in quick implementation

I have a global customer who wants to start the design phase in a big warehouse, but we do not have the equipment to do a site survey. I need support for the access point to implement in a freezer area. I do not have it. The customer tried to send one piece of equipment to Brazil. However, we had a problem because the customer needed to implement it in three months, and it took two months to send one equipment to Brazil.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With Cisco products and third-party products, integration of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good."

"It enables quick deployment within all branches for the users."

"The most valuable features include key elements like creating SSIDs, networking configurations, and the ability to manage all devices through a single console."

"For Meraki, the ease of deployment and management is most valuable."

"From a security perspective, this product has several advantages."

"Meraki WLAN is easy to deploy, includes a cloud controller, and updates continuously. It also offers high visibility."

"The product has been very stable over the years."

"It is easy to set up. You can do everything on the GUI. You don't need to trace cables. You don't need to connect to the switch. Everything is there, right in front of you."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The tool's best part is the GUI. It is user-friendly and fast due to AI features. The solution can help you fix things with AI, which is impressive."

"I have a very good experience with the solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Has an extremely good feature set."

"Multi PSK (Pre-shared Key) is a very good feature in the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"There are several valuable features. One of them is Cibas, and another one is Marvis."

"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive."

"The most valuable aspect is that they operate on small microservices, offering numerous open APIs that enhance the value of our Wi-Fi network. This flexibility allows us to optimize various aspects such as workforce planning and occupancy management. The platform is highly open in the market, providing robust APIs for seamless integration with other tools. Currently, we leverage these capabilities at a building site, incorporating IoT sensors to gather data. The collected data is stored in a centralized location, and we plan to use AI for analysis. This analysis will include insights on peak activity times, humidity levels, temperature variations, and other relevant metrics within the building."

More Mist AI and Cloud pros

Cons

"It could be slightly cheaper but it's fine."

"The customization needs to be improved because it's pretty locked down."

"I'd like better integration with security providers."

"Cisco offers pretty expensive devices."

"In the next release, I would like to see a third-party high tech center to connect multiple users to a particular network."

"They should introduce a grace period of 60 days after license expiry because as it is now, it automatically goes down and there is no grace period."

"If you lose connectivity with the controller, your Wi-Fi network is immediately impacted."

"Overall the solution needs to have more time to mature."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"The inter-functionality with other vendors was a negative for us."

"There could be more integration."

"The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly."

"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."

"The solution lacks documentation."

"Regarding opportunities for improvement in Mist, it is notable for its robust cloud portal and integration of artificial intelligence into various services, creating a highly efficient environment for work. However, a drawback lies in the cost associated with its WiFi offerings. With a pricing range of twelve hundred to fifteen hundred dollars for a single Access Point, exclusive of the subscription, it is acknowledged as a relatively expensive solution in the realm of WiFi services. Despite this drawback, the positive attributes of Mist make it a noteworthy option."

"It would be beneficial to have support for the Chinese language."

"Mist AI and Cloud should improve its integrations."

More Mist AI and Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price of the product could be cheaper."

"We pay licensing fees."

"It is expensive."

"Its price is high and should be reduced."

"The price of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could be improved, it is too expensive. We pay for the solution on an annual basis."

"The solution could improve the licensing structure and the price is expensive."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"The price is about the same compared to other vendors. There is an add-on license, but it's up to you if you want to buy it or not."

"The solution's price is too high for the end-users. My customers pay 1,000 USD towards the licensing cost of the solution every year."

"The price is not cheap, but it's a reliable solution and very easy for management."

"I rate the pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

"The price of Mist AI and Cloud is approximately 20 percent less than competitors, such as Aruba and Cisco. However, Cisco has a lifetime warranty for its solutions."

"The custom licensing is a little bit expensive and I would rate it 7.5 out of 10."

"Depending on the features, I think it's quite reasonably priced, especially considering the facilities of the product."

"Mist AI and Cloud is expensive."

More Mist AI and Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

32%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mist AI and Cloud?

AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mist AI and Cloud?

The price is very high in Brazil because of the high tax. The solution is expensive in Brazil.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mist AI and Cloud?

There are many aspects of AI, and how acquisitions are proceeding, particularly between Juniper and Aruba, remains unclear. From a Juniper perspective, there is a need for further improvements in t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 32% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 16% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 11% of the time

Ubiquiti Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Aruba Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Mist AI and Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

March 2025

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mist AI and Cloud

March 2025

Download Mist AI and Cloud product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Mist Access Points

Overview

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

Cisco

Mist AI uses a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences and simplify operations across the wireless access, wired access, and SD-WAN domains.

Data is ingested from numerous sources, including Juniper Mist Access Points, Switches, Session Smart Routers, and Firewalls for end-to-end insight into user experiences. These devices work in concert with Mist AI to optimize user experiences from client-to-cloud, including automated event correlation, root cause identification, Self-Driving Network™ operations, network assurance, proactive anomaly detection, and more.

Juniper also leverages Mist AI for next-generation customer support. It is the foundational element behind Marvis, the industry’s first AI-driven Virtual Network Assistant, which provides extensive insight and guidance to IT staff via a natural language conversational interface.

With Mist AI, operators save time and money with faster problem resolution and fewer onsite visits. Users benefit from a network infrastructure that is more predictable, reliable, and measurable.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud

March 2025

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.