Aruba Instant On Access Points Reviews

The first step I normally use to install my network devices, in this case, Aruba Instant On Access Points, is to upgrade them to the best available. The second one is the configuration of the network IT management. The VLAN and mining areas ensure it is steady, and then I do some tests, and finally, I do the implementation.

In my company, we use Aruba Instant On Access Points with one or two other switches. The first tool I am implementing in the Mexico region is HPE Aruba Networking CX 6100 Switch Series.

The performance of the tool is the same as all other solutions. The difference between other tools and Aruba Instant On Access Points revolves around the costs. We don't have some differences between other tools and Aruba Instant On Access Points since our operation unit is not demanding.

There are a couple of different use cases. The first one is that I bought it for my home because I needed a dedicated Wi-Fi access point, and I was intrigued with the way it sets up. I enjoyed the performance of it, and I recommended it to a friend of mine who was totally non-tech savvy. The thing that was super cool about it was that he was able to plug it in at home, give me a phone call, read me the serial number, and I was able to provision it remotely.

I also use it at work. It is something that's convenient for other engineers to hop on real quick and do unhindered testing.

I'm using AP12, and I'm using the 1900 switch series. It is 1930 or something like that.

In my organization, our use case for the solution was end-to-end connectivity. In our office, we basically had wall jacks that were dedicated to out-of-band access. In terms of ease of use, I was able to drop this solution in and get it up and running very quickly. It brought deployment times to almost zero because it sets up in about five minutes.

Its physical coverage is good. I've got about a 1600-square-foot home, and I find that it covers all of the insides of my home fine. If I go out outdoors, then it starts to fall off, but it is totally acceptable for my use case.

The maximum number of devices that I've ever connected is about 30. The unit is rated for 64 or 128 users, which is beyond the scope of what I need. So, it falls within my parameters perfectly.

It meets my specification perfectly in terms of the reliability of the coverage when multiple user devices are simultaneously accessing the solution for bandwidth-intensive use.

We use this solution for our wireless employee network and the wireless guest network for our clients. We have it for personal devices as well. It runs the wireless network for the company.

It improved our organization by lowering the cost of APs. Cisco is more expensive, and we're saving money. It helps us to utilize our funds elsewhere. It gives our employees and our clients easy-to-use internet access which makes them happy. It's a win-win all around.

The app allows me to see that we transferred 137-Gigs in the last 24 hours. I haven't had any complaints, and we can see insights into what people use the most. The metrics on the app are pretty good. We can see who uses utilities versus instant messaging, who browsed the web, streaming, and productivity, which is cool.

I'm in the warehousing business, and we use the solution to create a kind of LAN in the warehouse.

Aruba is much better than other vendors like Cisco and NETGEAR in terms of quality, price, and value for money. We used the 303 series earlier, but now we have moved on to the 505 series.

I am responsible for meeting customer expectations with the most appropriate IT solutions. I provide equipment recommendations based on customer needs and availability. Additionally, I have worked with Aruba access points, among other equipment.

My role involves distinguishing the best products for customer requirements, considering cost and power consumption. Aruba is reliable, which aids in meeting customer needs effectively.

Our primary use case is to give users access to WiFi in the office.

Aruba Instant on Access Points is easy to manage, has a very nice interface, and looks nicer on the ceiling. 

The coverage Aruba provides across the physical area is much better. Most probably because of the new technology, the 4x4 antenna, and everything around it. It's just a much better, easier to use, and easier to manage product.

The cloud-based solution is very easy to set up and easy to manage. You get reporting on it, alerts, and everything.

There is no need to have any physical buttons on the devices, when it's done through the cloud interface, everything is perfect. The full functionality of doing changes on it automatically gets applied to the access points.

It's just a perfectly working product.

In general, we have a good experience with Unifi switches in our conference rooms. 

However, we have faced several issues in the last year. We tried changing the cabling, switch, and power injector, but the problems persisted. 

We also use Unifi in hotels and conference rooms, but only one conference room uses Aruba due to its larger size.

Initially, Unifi switches provided a very good experience with ease of management using both the Unifi Controller and my cell phone.

We use this product in our hospital.  We use them for our medical computers connected to the Wi-Fi, our guests and patients on their mobile devices, and even for the small children. 

We also use them for internal support within the hospital. 

It's a very important tool for reliable connection, and we're happy with the Wi-Fi system.

It gives us a good speed for clients who connect to the wifi system.  It's mainly for our patients, medical doctors, and nurses. That was the most important thing we wanted to own.

The mobile app is good. We have many things that are connected through mobile. Most users use mobile to connect to the Wi-Fi. They are very happy and satisfied with this helpful tool.