Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Juniper is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 0.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Read 32 Aruba Instant On Access Points reviews

2,010 Views
995 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Read 20 Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reviews

5,860 Views
4,608 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Instant On Access Points and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are competing products in the wireless networking sector. Based on feature comparisons, Juniper Mist has an edge due to its advanced AI capabilities and comprehensive insights.

Features: Aruba Instant On Access Points are known for their ease of management, seamless setup, and aesthetic appeal, making them suitable for small to medium businesses. They offer robust coverage and user-friendly deployment without the need for physical buttons or controllers. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, on the other hand, are distinguished by AI-driven network management, providing comprehensive insights, advanced troubleshooting, and strong security features along with centralized management and analytics tools.

Room for Improvement: Aruba users have reported desires for better reporting capabilities, increased access point capacity, and improved management features for extensive setups. They also seek enhanced integration with other platforms and devices. Some Juniper Mist users suggest enhancements in pricing, support services, and adaptive features for better integration with other systems. Enhancing AI capabilities and minimizing network interference are also points of concern.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant On Access Points are praised for straightforward deployment and minimal setup time, primarily focusing on on-premises installations with technical support. Customer service experiences vary, with some describing response times as slow. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points offer diverse deployment options, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, easing integration into various network environments. While some users report satisfactory support, others mention the need for improved responsiveness in complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant On Access Points are perceived as cost-effective, with no ongoing licensing fees and an accessible entry price, which appeals to budget-conscious customers. Conversely, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are seen as more expensive due to higher upfront and annual costs attributed to extended feature offerings. While users acknowledge the value these features bring, some suggest it may not suit smaller budgets, impacting ROI perceptions.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Ranking in Wireless LAN

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Access Points is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.7%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Quintero

Infrastructure/Telcom Coordinator at Schnellecke Group AG & Co. KG

Affordable and offers an easy setup phase

I was working on the on-premises solutions, like IronNet, Aironet, and some other tools from Cisco, but not with Meraki. The last Aironet model that we have here in Mexico, in the corporate office, and in some of the other regions of Mexico is Cisco Aironet 3700 and Cisco Aironet 3800, so it is just two or three devices. Aruba Instant On Access Points was working with Aruba 2540 and Cisco 3850 In Cisco, I found some issues. I was working well with a vendor. I was working with Cisco Catalyst 9200 and Cisco Catalyst 9300, along with Cisco Catalyst 2916M XL Switch. With all devices, we got a report. During the immigration, we choose another vendor, which Aruba. We have some issues with Aruba Instant On Access Points in iOS that are targeting the devices, and I have seen some problems with the DHCP solution.

Read full review

Gyan Sharma

Assistant Programmer at Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha

Offers good performance, good solution and smooth implementation

I do have a suggestion: it would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network. If there are access points from other brands installed nearby; they can cause interference and disrupt the range of our Mist access points. So, the security features could be stronger, especially in terms of authentication. The connectivity is excellent, but security needs improvement. In future releases, integrating more AI features would be beneficial. If Mist had stronger AI features, it could provide better security against network threats and cyberattacks. So, this solution still needs to improve its AI capabilities. It would be great if the AI could improve the range of the access points, and auto-protect functionality should be there to avoid interference by other nearby access points and enhance threat detection. In the future, I'd like to see stronger threat detection features integrated with Mist, as well as better detection of nearby access points that might cause interference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a good solution and a good technology."

"When an error or alert happens, I receive it in the application. I do not have to be there to know if something is wrong."

"The virtual controller feature is very beneficial because it removes the need for a physical controller."

"The coverage Aruba provides across the physical area is much better. Most probably because of the new technology, the 4x4 antenna, and everything around it. It's just a much better, easier to use, and easier to manage product."

"The roaming feature and connectivity during disconnections are valuable."

"The initial setup is very simple."

"The virtual Controller feature is valuable."

"The solution's most valuable features include a simple deployment phase, easy management, and scalability."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pros

"Mist AI is a very powerful feature. Juniper is the only company that has introduced AI into networking."

"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."

"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."

"The solution is very secure."

"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."

"It's well-detailed in terms of troubleshooting logs."

"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."

"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pros

Cons

"The pricing could be a little cheaper."

"It would be good to integrate some marketing features into Aruba Instant On Access Points, like heat maps. This would allow deployment in warehouses or malls to see how people move from one point to another, helping to locate the original fit."

"The tool is priced high."

"The security aspect needs improvement."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the validation process, especially for customers facing compliance issues when managing access points from the cloud. It would be beneficial if the access points could also be managed from an on-premises controller. Regarding additional features, customers express interest in enhancing the controller, specifically improving the capability to manage a higher number of access points from the same controller. This feature is crucial for better scalability. Another feature that customers would appreciate is the ability to increase the number of access points. However, the current process for obtaining this permission can be time-consuming, and customers would like to see improvements in this regard."

"While it is mostly scalable, there are some limitations."

"In terms of financial benefits, the Aruba project is a high-cost solution, and I haven't seen specific financial returns."

"Stability largely depends on how access points are installed and managed. While Aruba cannot entirely ensure connection reliability, the deployment approach can minimize wireless link downtime."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points cons

"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."

"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."

"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."

"The solution is expensive."

"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."

"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."

"The pricing should be made cheaper."

"The price could be better."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is fair. It is not really cheap, and it is also not expensive. It is in the middle."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It's a cost-effective solution."

"The product's price falls on the cheaper end of the spectrum. The price of the product is one of the biggest benefits that it offers."

"Aruba Instant On Access Points are license-free. It's a very good and cheap solution for wireless networks. It can be compared with solutions from Ubiquiti and TP-Link, but it is in a different class. Aruba Instant On Access Points are cheaper than those from Cisco, Ruckus, and Motorola. It's perhaps the cheapest one. They do not use licenses, so it is a solution from the box. You don't need to pay extra money or deal with hidden payments."

"The price of Aruba Instant On Access Points is reasonable. They are competitively priced. I've even used it in my home at one time because of the low price."

"You buy it for $165 an AP, which is what we paid."

"It needs a license."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pricing and cost advice

"We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is fair."

"The pricing is too high."

"The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."

"If a customer has a budget of around five lakhs in Indian currency, they can afford Juniper products."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

62%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Access Points?

It's really easy to set up. And, you don't have to pay for the cloud solution. That's really interesting for our clients. And the other thing is, the roaming is also quite good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Access Points?

Aruba Instant On Access Points work without a list price, suggesting that they are open source and no additional licensing costs are incurred.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Access Points?

All features already exist in Aruba Instant On Access Points. However, in future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial.

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

The solution is very secure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

Supporting multiple protocols would be beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 19% of the time

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 13% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 6% of the time

More Aruba Instant On Access Points Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 41% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points

April 2025

Download Aruba Instant On Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

March 2025

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report

Download Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points

Overview

Ingredients for success.

Fast 802.11ac Wave 2, secure employee and guest access, easy-to-use web, and mobile app management.

Say yes to secure Wi-Fi access.

Pre-built access control lists (ACLs) and built-in firewall in the access points prevent malicious traffic from entering your network – we call it “hassle-free” security.

Never drop an important call.

With Instant On, voice and video business applications are automatically prioritized, so you stay connected with your peers.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

Juniper

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

March 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.