Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while Juniper is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 0.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Read 31 Aruba Instant On Access Points reviews

2,314 Views
1,124 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Read 19 Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reviews

6,049 Views
4,660 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Instant On Access Points and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are competing products in the wireless networking sector. Based on feature comparisons, Juniper Mist has an edge due to its advanced AI capabilities and comprehensive insights.

Features: Aruba Instant On Access Points are known for their ease of management, seamless setup, and aesthetic appeal, making them suitable for small to medium businesses. They offer robust coverage and user-friendly deployment without the need for physical buttons or controllers. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, on the other hand, are distinguished by AI-driven network management, providing comprehensive insights, advanced troubleshooting, and strong security features along with centralized management and analytics tools.

Room for Improvement: Aruba users have reported desires for better reporting capabilities, increased access point capacity, and improved management features for extensive setups. They also seek enhanced integration with other platforms and devices. Some Juniper Mist users suggest enhancements in pricing, support services, and adaptive features for better integration with other systems. Enhancing AI capabilities and minimizing network interference are also points of concern.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant On Access Points are praised for straightforward deployment and minimal setup time, primarily focusing on on-premises installations with technical support. Customer service experiences vary, with some describing response times as slow. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points offer diverse deployment options, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, easing integration into various network environments. While some users report satisfactory support, others mention the need for improved responsiveness in complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant On Access Points are perceived as cost-effective, with no ongoing licensing fees and an accessible entry price, which appeals to budget-conscious customers. Conversely, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are seen as more expensive due to higher upfront and annual costs attributed to extended feature offerings. While users acknowledge the value these features bring, some suggest it may not suit smaller budgets, impacting ROI perceptions.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Ranking in Wireless LAN

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Access Points is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.9%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Quintero

Infrastructure/Telcom Coordinator at Schnellecke Group AG & Co. KG

Affordable and offers an easy setup phase

I was working on the on-premises solutions, like IronNet, Aironet, and some other tools from Cisco, but not with Meraki. The last Aironet model that we have here in Mexico, in the corporate office, and in some of the other regions of Mexico is Cisco Aironet 3700 and Cisco Aironet 3800, so it is just two or three devices. Aruba Instant On Access Points was working with Aruba 2540 and Cisco 3850 In Cisco, I found some issues. I was working well with a vendor. I was working with Cisco Catalyst 9200 and Cisco Catalyst 9300, along with Cisco Catalyst 2916M XL Switch. With all devices, we got a report. During the immigration, we choose another vendor, which Aruba. We have some issues with Aruba Instant On Access Points in iOS that are targeting the devices, and I have seen some problems with the DHCP solution.

Read full review

Gyan Sharma

Assistant Programmer at Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha

Offers good performance, good solution and smooth implementation

I do have a suggestion: it would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network. If there are access points from other brands installed nearby; they can cause interference and disrupt the range of our Mist access points. So, the security features could be stronger, especially in terms of authentication. The connectivity is excellent, but security needs improvement. In future releases, integrating more AI features would be beneficial. If Mist had stronger AI features, it could provide better security against network threats and cyberattacks. So, this solution still needs to improve its AI capabilities. It would be great if the AI could improve the range of the access points, and auto-protect functionality should be there to avoid interference by other nearby access points and enhance threat detection. In the future, I'd like to see stronger threat detection features integrated with Mist, as well as better detection of nearby access points that might cause interference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The app and the provisioning are the best features of the product. It was really impressive that I was able to just provision it remotely. I didn't have to be on-site with my friend, and we were just able to get everything up and operational. So, the app is great. It sends me notifications when things are down, and it tells me how everything is doing."

"Aruba is much better than other vendors like Cisco and NETGEAR in terms of quality, price, and value for money."

"The configuration is very simple."

"I would recommend Aruba Instant On Access Points to others."

"I find Aruba Instant On Access Points easy to monitor and appreciate the notifications they provide if there is a problem in the network."

"The virtual Controller feature is valuable."

"The most valuable aspect of Unifi switches is the Unifi Controller."

"Its technical support is excellent."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pros

"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."

"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."

"The product is quite user-friendly and easy to deploy, so one should definitely consider buying it."

"Mist AI is a very powerful feature. Juniper is the only company that has introduced AI into networking."

"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."

"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pros

Cons

"The limited functionality of the mobile app restricts its use primarily to small and medium-sized setups, making it less suitable for enterprise-level solutions."

"The tool's pricing is not good."

"The solution should include higher speed and lesser cost."

"It is suitable for smaller organizations, but it may not be the best choice for large enterprises."

"It is scalable to a certain degree but not nearly as scalable and robust as your enterprise-grade solutions."

"It would be good to integrate some marketing features into Aruba Instant On Access Points, like heat maps. This would allow deployment in warehouses or malls to see how people move from one point to another, helping to locate the original fit."

"It's only suitable for smaller offices. It doesn't scale well."

"In future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points cons

"The solution is expensive."

"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."

"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."

"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."

"The pricing should be made cheaper."

"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."

"The price could be better."

"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aruba Instant On Access Points are license-free. It's a very good and cheap solution for wireless networks. It can be compared with solutions from Ubiquiti and TP-Link, but it is in a different class. Aruba Instant On Access Points are cheaper than those from Cisco, Ruckus, and Motorola. It's perhaps the cheapest one. They do not use licenses, so it is a solution from the box. You don't need to pay extra money or deal with hidden payments."

"Its price is fair. It is not really cheap, and it is also not expensive. It is in the middle."

"I rate the product's pricing a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"You buy it for $165 an AP, which is what we paid."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It needs a license."

"It is expensive."

"The product's price falls on the cheaper end of the spectrum. The price of the product is one of the biggest benefits that it offers."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pricing and cost advice

"I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."

"Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."

"The pricing is fair."

"I rate the product price as a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive. It is a reasonably priced tool."

"We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."

"The pricing is too high."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

65%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Access Points?

It's really easy to set up. And, you don't have to pay for the cloud solution. That's really interesting for our clients. And the other thing is, the roaming is also quite good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Access Points?

Aruba Instant On Access Points work without a list price, suggesting that they are open source and no additional licensing costs are incurred.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Access Points?

All features already exist in Aruba Instant On Access Points. However, in future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial.

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

The solution is very secure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

Supporting multiple protocols would be beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 21% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 12% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

More Aruba Instant On Access Points Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 44% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 1% of the time

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points

February 2025

Download Aruba Instant On Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

February 2025

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report

Download Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points

Overview

Ingredients for success.

Fast 802.11ac Wave 2, secure employee and guest access, easy-to-use web, and mobile app management.

Say yes to secure Wi-Fi access.

Pre-built access control lists (ACLs) and built-in firewall in the access points prevent malicious traffic from entering your network – we call it “hassle-free” security.

Never drop an important call.

With Instant On, voice and video business applications are automatically prioritized, so you stay connected with your peers.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

Juniper

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

January 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.