Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while Juniper is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 0.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.
Aruba Instant On Access Points
Read 31 Aruba Instant On Access Points reviews
  • 2,380 Views
  • 1,169 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Read 19 Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reviews
  • 6,007 Views
  • 4,628 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Instant On Access Points and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are competing products in the wireless networking sector. Based on feature comparisons, Juniper Mist has an edge due to its advanced AI capabilities and comprehensive insights.

Features: Aruba Instant On Access Points are known for their ease of management, seamless setup, and aesthetic appeal, making them suitable for small to medium businesses. They offer robust coverage and user-friendly deployment without the need for physical buttons or controllers. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, on the other hand, are distinguished by AI-driven network management, providing comprehensive insights, advanced troubleshooting, and strong security features along with centralized management and analytics tools.

Room for Improvement: Aruba users have reported desires for better reporting capabilities, increased access point capacity, and improved management features for extensive setups. They also seek enhanced integration with other platforms and devices. Some Juniper Mist users suggest enhancements in pricing, support services, and adaptive features for better integration with other systems. Enhancing AI capabilities and minimizing network interference are also points of concern.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant On Access Points are praised for straightforward deployment and minimal setup time, primarily focusing on on-premises installations with technical support. Customer service experiences vary, with some describing response times as slow. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points offer diverse deployment options, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, easing integration into various network environments. While some users report satisfactory support, others mention the need for improved responsiveness in complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant On Access Points are perceived as cost-effective, with no ongoing licensing fees and an accessible entry price, which appeals to budget-conscious customers. Conversely, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are seen as more expensive due to higher upfront and annual costs attributed to extended feature offerings. While users acknowledge the value these features bring, some suggest it may not suit smaller budgets, impacting ROI perceptions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Access Points
Ranking in Wireless LAN
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Ranking in Wireless LAN
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Access Points is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Quintero - PeerSpot reviewer
Affordable and offers an easy setup phase
I was working on the on-premises solutions, like IronNet, Aironet, and some other tools from Cisco, but not with Meraki. The last Aironet model that we have here in Mexico, in the corporate office, and in some of the other regions of Mexico is Cisco Aironet 3700 and Cisco Aironet 3800, so it is just two or three devices. Aruba Instant On Access Points was working with Aruba 2540 and Cisco 3850 In Cisco, I found some issues. I was working well with a vendor. I was working with Cisco Catalyst 9200 and Cisco Catalyst 9300, along with Cisco Catalyst 2916M XL Switch. With all devices, we got a report. During the immigration, we choose another vendor, which Aruba. We have some issues with Aruba Instant On Access Points in iOS that are targeting the devices, and I have seen some problems with the DHCP solution.
Read full review
Gyan Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good performance, good solution and smooth implementation
I do have a suggestion: it would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network. If there are access points from other brands installed nearby; they can cause interference and disrupt the range of our Mist access points. So, the security features could be stronger, especially in terms of authentication. The connectivity is excellent, but security needs improvement. In future releases, integrating more AI features would be beneficial. If Mist had stronger AI features, it could provide better security against network threats and cyberattacks. So, this solution still needs to improve its AI capabilities. It would be great if the AI could improve the range of the access points, and auto-protect functionality should be there to avoid interference by other nearby access points and enhance threat detection. In the future, I'd like to see stronger threat detection features integrated with Mist, as well as better detection of nearby access points that might cause interference.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Regarding access points, the customer typically considers low-cost plans, and Ruckus Unleashed Access Points are commonly used. These access points are managed through the Microsoft console and can be accessed either with or without ports. The management is done through a controller. The main benefits customers see include cost-effectiveness, especially for those with budget constraints. Aruba, in particular, provides a good user experience. Some customers might choose Huawei, but enterprise access points are also considered. Additionally, the unified access point capabilities are valuable, allowing management from the same account. However, there is a limitation of twenty-five access points, and if a customer requires more, they need to create another site or account. If the customer exceeds twenty-five access points, they need to generate another site or virtual business to manage additional access points, as the external number is limited to twenty-five."
"The initial setup is easy."
"With a variety of switches in their setup, they find that Aruba's online monitoring tools and configuration options for applications effectively manage most of their requirements, all while keeping the process straightforward and user-friendly."
"The mobile app is good. We have many things that are connected through mobile. Most users use mobile to connect to the Wi-Fi."
"The product is scalable. It has 20 users."
"The product is easy to set up, providing value for time since it is very quick."
"Configuring everything in the cloud with Aruba Central and having all the devices be independent of a centralized controller has made it simple to deploy."
"I would recommend Aruba Instant On Access Points to others."
More Aruba Instant On Access Points pros
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The simplicity is great."
"The solution is stable."
"The product is quite user-friendly and easy to deploy, so one should definitely consider buying it."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"For the most part, it does what it's supposed to do, and I like it. It's a great product."
"Mist AI is a very powerful feature. Juniper is the only company that has introduced AI into networking."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pros
 

Cons

"If there's a way to get a floor map of our office space so we can place the access points on a map to be able to see what's what, where everything is going, where the most traffic is being connected, that would be a nice feature."
"Stability largely depends on how access points are installed and managed. While Aruba cannot entirely ensure connection reliability, the deployment approach can minimize wireless link downtime."
"The security aspect needs improvement."
"I want the product to be made available at a cheaper price point."
"When I first deployed the solution, I couldn't use a tagged VLAN for the management. It might already have been fixed in a recent firmware upgrade."
"The customer service and support are terrible."
"It is scalable to a certain degree but not nearly as scalable and robust as your enterprise-grade solutions."
"It would be good to integrate some marketing features into Aruba Instant On Access Points, like heat maps. This would allow deployment in warehouses or malls to see how people move from one point to another, helping to locate the original fit."
More Aruba Instant On Access Points cons
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Though certain security features are integrated into the product, my company has to always look forward to tightening certain security functionalities in the solution."
"The solution is expensive."
"Juniper should make the products more affordable."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"It is competitively priced. It was at a price point that made sense for me to put in my home, and that says something. The cost of the solution includes everything we need to manage and upgrade our Wi-Fi network, including the mobile management app. Having the licensing and all the functionality built into the base price of the product is really important for me. There are no extra costs for the security feature or automatic software/firmware updates, which is really important to me."
"The product's price falls on the cheaper end of the spectrum. The price of the product is one of the biggest benefits that it offers."
"Aruba Instant On Access Points are license-free. It's a very good and cheap solution for wireless networks. It can be compared with solutions from Ubiquiti and TP-Link, but it is in a different class. Aruba Instant On Access Points are cheaper than those from Cisco, Ruckus, and Motorola. It's perhaps the cheapest one. They do not use licenses, so it is a solution from the box. You don't need to pay extra money or deal with hidden payments."
"You buy it for $165 an AP, which is what we paid."
"The price of Aruba Instant On Access Points is reasonable. They are competitively priced. I've even used it in my home at one time because of the low price."
"It is expensive."
"Its price is fair. It is not really cheap, and it is also not expensive. It is in the middle."
More Aruba Instant On Access Points pricing and cost advice
"Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
"The pricing is fair."
"I rate the product price as a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive. It is a reasonably priced tool."
"If a customer has a budget of around five lakhs in Indian currency, they can afford Juniper products."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
"The pricing is too high."
"The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."
"We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
63%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Access Points?
It's really easy to set up. And, you don't have to pay for the cloud solution. That's really interesting for our clients. And the other thing is, the roaming is also quite good.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Access Points?
Aruba Instant On Access Points work without a list price, suggesting that they are open source and no additional licensing costs are incurred.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Access Points?
All features already exist in Aruba Instant On Access Points. However, in future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial.
See all answers
What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The solution is very secure.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
Supporting multiple protocols would be beneficial.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points Logo
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points
Compared 20% of the time
Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Instant On Access Points Logo
Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Instant On Access Points
Compared 17% of the time
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points Logo
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points
Compared 12% of the time
Omada Access Points vs Aruba Instant On Access Points Logo
Omada Access Points vs Aruba Instant On Access Points
Compared 10% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Aruba Instant On Access Points Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Aruba Instant On Access Points
Compared 6% of the time
More Aruba Instant On Access Points Competitors
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 45% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 16% of the time
Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 15% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 5% of the time
Huawei Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Huawei Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 1% of the time
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Access Points
January 2025
Aruba Instant On Access Points reportDownload Aruba Instant On Access Points product report
Buyer's Guide
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
January 2025
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reportDownload Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points
 

Learn More

Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Juniper
 

Overview


Ingredients for success.

Fast 802.11ac Wave 2, secure employee and guest access, easy-to-use web, and mobile app management.


Say yes to secure Wi-Fi access.

Pre-built access control lists (ACLs) and built-in firewall in the access points prevent malicious traffic from entering your network – we call it “hassle-free” security.


Never drop an important call.

With Instant On, voice and video business applications are automatically prioritized, so you stay connected with your peers.

Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
January 2025
Free Report: Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.