Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
Software QA Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Good reporting as well as integration with Jenkins and Slack, but it crashes often
Pros and Cons
  • "The most important feature is the Jenkins integration; it is pretty straight forward and allows us to run nightly builds."
  • "It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."

What is our primary use case?

We evaluated Katalon Studio along with Postman and SoapUI to be part of our testing framework. We used it mainly for microservices, API automation, and testing API endpoints. We click one button to have it run all of the tests and generate a report.

How has it helped my organization?

Katalon Studio is useful because it helped us to generate reports to see which test cases passed versus which ones failed. It gives a good graphical representation of the results.

What is most valuable?

The most important feature is the Jenkins integration; it is pretty straight forward and allows us to run nightly builds.

The integration with Slack is very helpful.

The Katalon Analytical Studio, which is directly integrated, offers better reporting capabilities, which is a good feature.

What needs improvement?

We found that Katalon Studio crashes a lot of the time and it would be very good if it were more stable. When it crashes, the tests are not always saved and this means that you have to start again from scratch. It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature.

Buyer's Guide
Katalon Studio
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Katalon Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We used Katalon Studio for about two months while we were evaluating different products.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution crashes often and stability is something that needs improvement.

I would rate the stability a six and a half out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability depends on the scope of the project. It is not meant for load testing. However, if it can be integrated then you would see that it's more scalable in that aspect. Because it is just for API endpoint testing, it is not as scalable as one would assume. Again, it is for endpoint testing as opposed to load testing.

We had a team of four or five people who were using this product. They are test engineers with similar roles. 

How are customer service and support?

It is a growing community. There are documents available but I would say that the community is pretty small as compared to what Postman has.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to this solution, we were using TestNG. It is more about writing automation code as opposed to using an automation tool. Using it means that you have to write a lot of code. Code snippets will do for some testing but if you want to do regression testing then there is a lot more to do. One of the reasons that we implemented Postman, and evaluated Katalon Studio, was to get away from writing code and using something more stable.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is quite straightforward.

We deploy per release, where every two weeks we deploy a new release.

Our implementation strategy is to create the test case first, then to create a test suite in the object repository. We can add all of the endpoints, and the calls for the endpoints. We run the tests through the suites, which will test all of the test cases. It is then run with the Jenkins integration and Slack integration to get the results, and what has passed or failed will be clear.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation is straightforward if you are using it from the local machine. You can download it directly through the provider interface.

If you are running it through the Jenkins you will require a plugin to be downloaded. Jenkins supports plugins that include the Katalon plugin, and once downloaded, you enter your code into the repository and run it from there.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We were using the free version of this tool.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Postman and SoapUI along with Katalon Studio. Ultimately, we chose Postman because it has been in the market for a while, it has good open-source documentation and has a more active community. In general, people trust it.

What other advice do I have?

Products such as this one are a byproduct of artificial intelligence. It comes up with very nice code snippets that we can use, and it is good to see the industry moving forward in this aspect. The future is AI and Katalon is a part of that.

When it comes to testing RESTful APIs, this is a good solution but in the alternative, Postman is out there. That is the one that we ultimately chose to implement.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user872649 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Lead at Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.
Real User
Object Spy makes it easy to find an element on the web page
Pros and Cons
  • "We are now performing automated testing in 15 minutes, which were previously taking a long time when doing it manually."
  • "I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
  • "It should start working on Silverlight automation."

What is our primary use case?

We have used this tool to automate the regression test suite for our testing environment. In the coming future, we are willing to do the same in staging and production environments.

How has it helped my organization?

It definitely improved the organization in terms of time. We are now performing automated testing in 15 minutes, which were previously taking a long time when doing it manually.

What is most valuable?

We liked the built-in framework. 

Also, I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page.

What needs improvement?

Katalon Studio should improve on its supported platforms. It should start working on Silverlight automation as well.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Katalon Studio
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Katalon Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Software QA Tester / Team Lead at Brightest NV
Real User
Helps a lot with website automation
Pros and Cons
  • "The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error."
  • "Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."

What is our primary use case?

We use Katalon for automating our website. The environment that we use it in is an website build in Node.js.

How has it helped my organization?

Previously, we had no automation solution for the web. Therefore, this application has helped a lot in automating the web.

What is most valuable?

The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error.

What needs improvement?

Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

None whatsoever.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

None whatsoever.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not have a previous solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is no cost for setup or licensing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is when you need a solution for a web automation tool, then use this one.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user824700 - PeerSpot reviewer
Référent Qualité logicielle with 10,001+ employees
User
It provides us daily feedback on the status of the core features of our websites
Pros and Cons
  • "It provides us daily feedback on the status (failing/working) of the core features of our websites."
  • "Video capture on failure is a must have. A picture is worth a thousand words. A video is worth a thousand pictures (literally)."
  • "Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."

What is our primary use case?

I use it for website end-to-end automation and continuous testing via integration on the VSTS CI pipeline. The tool is fully integrated in our tool process.

How has it helped my organization?

It provides us daily feedback on the status (failing/working) of the core features of our websites. A great tool for a non-technical tester to learn automated testing. Also, it is great for a technical tester, because it allows great customization.

What is most valuable?

Video capture on failure is a must have. A picture is worth a thousand words. A video is worth a thousand pictures (literally).

What needs improvement?

Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works.

For how long have I used the solution?

Still implementing.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user