MariaDB Reviews

We are into IoT intrusion systems. Our product is based on building automation systems. We get sensor data from across the regions. We have our own cloud hosted in GCP. The sensor data comes directly to Cassandra. We use MariaDB as a data source for UI purposes. We use a 3-node multi-master architecture using MariaDB Galera Cluster. It is deployed on Kubernetes.

The tool has good scalability and performance. The integration with other products is seamless.

Maria DB is a good product. If any clients want to use MariaDB, I agree with them. The decision to use any software is mostly made by the decision-maker or management. 

As you know, we have better job interactions, and in an enterprise, whether to use MariaDB or another option like MySQL, it's a political decision. I am an architect in the permission system, which follows the policies of this enterprise.

It doesn't have the same level of maturity metrics as Postgres.

For example, if you look at the architecture of Postgres, it has an architecture similar to Oracle, a robust and widely practiced architecture. In terms of multi-database support, both Postgres and MySQL have the same objective. 

Every software, including MariaDB, has its own advantages and features tailored to customer needs. In my opinion, it's a very good solution. I don't have any points to criticize it as a database. We prioritize the needs of our customers and choose from various options accordingly. For instance, MariaDB or MySQL could be suitable options depending on the specific requirements of the project.

In the future release, better management of tablespaces would be beneficial. Currently, it's a bit lacking in that area. Additionally, more efficient space utilization could be improved.

We mostly use MariaDB on smaller systems, not for mission critical systems. For mission critical systems, we use Oracle.

We're using version 10.5. The solution is deployed on-premises.

We're a very centralized operation. We install the system on an application, the application runs the services, and people consume those services. We have three systems running this on the database.

The cost is much lower than other solutions, especially if you look at the functionality compared to MySQL.

In my work with ServiceNow, customer instances typically use MariaDB databases. As a performance engineer and tester, I focus on the application's performance and ensure its smooth integration with MariaDB. This means I'm responsible for identifying and troubleshooting any performance issues that might arise.

A relational database like MariaDB offers several advantages, including faster query execution and improved login security. Having evaluated other options like MySQL, I find MariaDB's strengths align perfectly with my specific database needs. 

MariaDB is known for its user-friendly interface and excels in specific performance areas. It delivers fast processing times, particularly for frequent select queries and insert/update operations.

For various applications, we use MariaDB as a database to test the incoming and outgoing data for any application. 

We check the relational database, how it's working, how the data is organized, how the queries have been written, and how we can streamline or improve the performance of these stored procedures. 

These are the things we look for to maintain a good relationship between the front end and the back end of the system.

One of the great features of MariaDB is its scalability. It's easy to handle even with large databases. 

It's also user-friendly and allows you to create complex relationships with the data. It means you can fetch data from multiple correlated or related databases in a single query. So it allows complex relationships with specific databases.

MariaDB supports SQL, and it has an advantage over regular SQL in that it is a lighter version. Even with huge amounts of data, it performs well.

The solution is primarily a database. There are lots of telco operations coming there, including log files, operations like SMS Firewall, and lots of rules that have been passing through the database. Almost 10 terabytes of database is available in MySQL.

The product is open-source and free to use. 

If you know the parameters and combine those parameters, you have a lot of advantages over the Microsoft SQL Server.

With MariaDB, you can use it as a column store database. This means you replicate your data, transactional data, as columnar data, and then you can use it as a sort-of business intelligence.

It's a very easy product to set up.

We use several solutions for analyzing purposes including MariaDB, MongoDB, and PostgreSQL.

Our use cases for MariaDB are 50% for transferring data and 50% for storage purposes.

MariaDB is a user-friendly solution. Performance wise, it's better than SQL. With SQL, I would need to write a number of queries. In contrast, MariaDB is light.

In addition, MariaDB's transferring speed is very high compared to that of other DBs.

We are currently doing UAT testing with MariaDB. Production has not started.

We will be using MariaDB in a complex project for the airlines.

MariaDB has helped our organization because we are able to use the solution more for projects. We do not have to pay a lot for licensing as we did before.