Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Specialist Advisor (Data Custodian) at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Highly customizable and reliable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is customization. It provides the building block from its modularity. You can add what you need with the appropriate code."
  • "Microsoft Azure App Service could improve by having better integration and connectivity with other platforms. The solution has good integration with other large companies' solutions but there are smaller service platforms companies where there could be integrated better."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Microsoft Azure App Service in the government sector.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is customization. It provides the building block from its modularity. You can add what you need with the appropriate code.

What needs improvement?

Microsoft Azure App Service could improve by having better integration and connectivity with other platforms. The solution has good integration with other large companies' solutions but there are smaller service platforms companies where there could be integrated better.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft Azure App Service for approximately seven years.

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure App Service
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure App Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The Microsoft Azure App Service platform is stable. We have a business continuity plan and we need our services to be always on.

I rate the stability of Microsoft Azure App Service a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Microsoft Azure App Service is scalable.

I rate the scalability of Microsoft Azure App Service a nine out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Microsoft Azure App Service was easy. There was a logical path in how to do it. I have a development environment because I'm using Dynamics 365.

I rate the initial setup of Microsoft Azure App Service a five out of ten.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing model of Microsoft Azure App Service could be made more clear. There is a scale and range and it can be complicated and convoluted. Some simplification is needed.

I rate the price of Microsoft Azure App Service a seven out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Azure App Service an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
A multi-tenant environment where customers can load and run applications
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the ability to scale the application."
  • "The outbound connectivity is not great."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for this solution is hosting web applications which can be Linux or Windows-based. Microsoft Azure App Service is a multi-tenant environment where customers can load and run the application. It is similar to a platform as a service.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the ability to scale the application. It scales dynamically and comes with two features. If you can find a fabulous feature in the Azure Functions app, it allows you to scale, so you don't need to worry about manually scaling or setting any scaling parameters. Then it automatically does the scaling on its own.

The other feature comes with VNet integration. So we can connect the Microsoft Azure App Service to a VNet so that it can privately communicate with other resources within Azure with a private IP. It also comes with the CDN feature, which can automatically load in some of your configuration files and use it instead of going back to storage to pick that up. It also has awesome features like backup, so you don't need to set up a recovery service, as it automatically does that. So you can back up the existing state of your application in case of any loss. In a nutshell, it has dynamic tools.

What needs improvement?

The outbound connectivity is not great but can be improved because, on virtual machines, the Microsoft Azure App Service uses four or five outbound IPs. So basically, if you want to communicate with an external source, you can use outbound IPs. For example, you must whitelist the outbound IP when communicating with an SQL database externally. However, because it's a multi-tenant environment and other customer applications are being shared on a skills tab, there are always limitations in the smart port. So each customer has a particular allocated smart port, which they should exhaust. It helps to work with the code. Regardless of features like a firewall where they have a hub and an environment they have features like a front door which can increase the smart port's limits to about 64,000. Hence, it will be good to have one IP without needing to add any other infrastructure.

Additionally, they can improve scaling the typical environment in terms of scalability. I believe the limit for the multi-tenant environment is about 20 to 30 maximum on the PV3. So if they can increase that, other than having these significant scaling limits for the Microsoft Azure App Service environment, which is about 200, that will also help.

Also, dedicating one outbound IP for App Service will go a long way.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

They have a good support team. We don't think the front-end support is of concern because the front end has to talk to the internal respective application engineering team. Sometimes the core platform issues may take about two months or more. They can answer your queries, and they can help you do investigations.

Additionally, depending on your support package, if you have a premium plan, you get the best because you have support engineers who are intelligent. But you get different services with the pro-direct support plan. There's miscommunication between the front end and the application engineering team. I think that's something that they need to improve. On a premium plan, you get excellent support. I rate support for pro-direct a six out of ten and premium support an eight out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. You can set it up through the portal, a template, or Terraform. It integrates with other features like Docker so if you have your image in Docker Hub or ECR, you can select the image, and it pulls those images in and runs your application.

It has many features, and other deployment methods like Bitbucket, FTP, DevOps, and GitLab can integrate these things into Microsoft Azure App Service. It is easy to set up because you don't need to start building servers. We also don't need to complete any maintenance. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of this solution is competitive. It works as an App Service plan so you can have multiple App Services that are part of a plan. So, for example, you can have about 10 App Services in an App Service plan. It's like a VM, where you have different applications running and you are not charged for all of the applications. However, you are being charged for the plan, so I think it's worth having that setup. At the same time, you need to plan how your costs will be and their ranges of variations. As we call it, SKU is where you can easily factor in so it is okay in terms of price.

One of the best products is the Functions app, which comes with serverless computing in the sense that it gives you about a million transactions for free every month. That is one of the cheapest. So you don't need to worry about how long your function triggers, just that if it scales more than that and performs more transactions, you get charged for it. The exact cost depends on the SKUs.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure App Service
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure App Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Solution Architect at Komatsu
Real User
Highly scalable solution that makes targeting global clients easy
Pros and Cons
  • "The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."
  • "If you're on the cloud, you just get a web interface without much detail for additional configuration or the authority to configure the root or system-level configuration."

What is our primary use case?

I use Azure App Service as an application deployment environment. It allows me to access the FTB directly in deployed applications and change certain rules and regulations like filtering of access management.

What is most valuable?

The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better.

What needs improvement?

If you're on the cloud, you just get a web interface without much detail for additional configuration or the authority to configure the root or system-level configuration. This is a weakness in the cloud version compared to desktop. In the next release, Microsoft should provide additional options for configuring the deployment environment.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for three to four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is one of this solution's strongest points.

How are customer service and support?

Microsoft's technical support meets expectations - sometimes there's a bug on their side, and we have some downtime, but it's usually minimal. However, there are some issues with technical staff passing cases on instead of dealing with them.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Azure App Service is expensive compared to its competitors, especially its cloud-only version. I would rate their pricing as two out of five.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Azure App Services as eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Technical Architect at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feature-rich, fantastic technical support, and debugging is easier with Application Insights
Pros and Cons
  • "Debugging using Application Insights is a valuable feature."
  • "Initially, there were some rare instances when the server went down because it was deployed on Linux."

What is our primary use case?

We have our application on Azure and it does a REST call through the App Service, which in turn connects to our on-premises database.

We are using Tomcat and Java in conjunction with this service.

This product is user-friendly and the customization is good.

How has it helped my organization?

We wanted an application that we can use on the cloud to expose services outside of our premises. Azure provides a good platform and the integration is very strong, as well as scalable. You don't have to worry about procuring a server or maintaining it. You simply write the code, deploy it, and Azure takes care of the scaling and everything else.

What is most valuable?

There are a lot of features, such as scaling up and scaling down.

Debugging using Application Insights is a valuable feature.

What needs improvement?

Initially, there were some rare instances when the server went down because it was deployed on Linux. There are some features that are not available on the Linux-based deployment, yet are available on Windows. This is something that I think Microsoft has now caught up.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the Azure App Service for the past year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We haven't had any issues with respect to stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It scales very well and in the case of our environment, it is good. We have approximately 20,000 people who are using the application.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is fantastic. We have calls with Microsoft every couple of weeks and they have been very helpful in giving us insights.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using Oracle prior to Azure, but that was on-premises. When we made the transition to the cloud, the company opted for Azure.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We have no complaints about the pricing.

What other advice do I have?

Everything looks good and we are happy with this product. It seems to have everything that we need and I haven't seen any limitations. My advice to anybody who is looking at it is that it's a good platform to start building your integrations.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Roshan George Thallamore - PeerSpot reviewer
Azure DevOps and Cloud Lead at a consultancy with self employed
Real User
Is ideal for lifting and shifting monolithic applications to the cloud but deployment needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is that it's an ideal solution when it comes to lifting and shifting monolithic applications from on-premises to Azure Cloud. It allows for a quick shift into the cloud without having to analyze and design very specific infrastructure and services for monolithic applications hosted primarily on-premises. Let's say that the team does not want to really redesign monoliths in a microservices-based application and that they want to make a quick move towards adopting the cloud tech stack. Then, Microsoft Azure App Service is probably the best option."
  • "In terms of room for improvement, ease of deployment would be an area that needs some focus. Azure does provide out-of-the-box deployment features, but I found that deploying to an App Service instance can be better in terms of more tools that could be available to perform a deployment."

What is our primary use case?

One use case was to host the Azure Bot logic code. The Bot logic was hosted on an App Service instance. The other use case was a POC where we were lifting and shifting a monolithic application, a .NET monolithic application, onto the cloud.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is that it's an ideal solution when it comes to lifting and shifting monolithic applications from on-premises to Azure Cloud. It allows for a quick shift into the cloud without having to analyze and design very specific infrastructure and services for monolithic applications hosted primarily on-premises. Let's say that the team does not want to really redesign monoliths in a microservices-based application and that they want to make a quick move towards adopting the cloud tech stack. Then, Microsoft Azure App Service is probably the best option.

What needs improvement?

In terms of room for improvement, ease of deployment would be an area that needs some focus. Azure does provide out-of-the-box deployment features, but I found that deploying to an App Service instance can be better in terms of more tools that could be available to perform a deployment.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution since 2020.

It is deployed on a virtual network on Azure.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable, but it really depends on the workload that is being shifted and the base service plan that is selected. Because though it is a platform as a service, you do have the option to design a service plan that is adequate for your applications, performance needs, and overall traffic that hits your applications. In terms of it being a platform-as-a-service feature, it is quite stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable. The user base for the Bot service application was about 400 to 500 users worldwide.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is average, and I would give them a six out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy and can be done quickly depending on the number of applications being deployed. A single application should not take more than a couple of minutes to deploy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost depends on the App Service plan that you choose. There are a number of tiers available.

What other advice do I have?

If you have a standard enterprise application, for example, for the sake of simplicity, a single server with 50 requests per second, trying to do a lift and shift to App Service is probably a good idea. Bot framework solutions generally tend to use App Service for custom Bot logic, for hosting the custom Bots and the custom logic for Bots. App Service is probably a bit easier in terms of implementation compared to that of other options.

However, for high performance applications that have a heavy load on them and are expected to perform at a certain level of response time, a pure lift and shift to App Service will not work well. You would probably need to choose a higher tier of App Service with a good App Service plan with a certain number of underlying host servers that are servicing it.

Overall, I would rate Microsoft Azure App Service at six on a scale from one to ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Eric Shimokawa - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Head at Nova Futura
Real User
App building service that is used to host and support project management for IT development
Pros and Cons
  • "This solution is easy to deploy."
  • "The cost management of this solution could be better. We only receive estimations."

What is our primary use case?

This solution is used for project management, source code and IT. It is used primarily for development purposes.

What is most valuable?

This solution is easy to deploy.

What needs improvement?

The cost management of this solution could be better. We only receive estimations.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable solution. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of this solution is very easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing and cost of this solution depends on the use and needs of a business.

What other advice do I have?

This is a good solution for those who want to start small looking for a data center that is cloud based.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Enterprise Architect at Prinzhorn IT
Real User
A scalable, highly stable solution with easy deployment and competitive pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of this solution are the easy deployment, the scalability, and the Azure maintenance."
  • "There is always room for improvement price-wise."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution for small rep services. We are using it currently for three or four small use cases and it is a perfect fit for all of them, which is why we chose it. 

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of this solution are the easy deployment, the scalability, and the Azure maintenance.

What needs improvement?

There is always room for improvement price-wise.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for about three or four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have found this solution to be highly stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is awesome. 

How was the initial setup?

The deployment of this solution is easy. 

What was our ROI?

On a scale of one to five, I would rate the ROI of this solution as a three.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate this solution as a four.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Lluis De Miquel - PeerSpot reviewer
Expert Architect / Development Leader at Viewnext
Real User
Easy to deploy, great for testing, and offers a free version
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution overall is very good."
  • "There are no issues with the solution."

What is our primary use case?

We’ve used the solution for deploying several applications. We use it for testing purposes. It’s used for testing web apps and developing some proof of concepts.

What is most valuable?

It's easy to deploy web apps through Common Line or Visual Studio Editor, which is useful as I can deploy container solutions.

It is scalable.

The solution overall is very good.

The implementation process is easy. It’s also fast.

It’s stable.

What needs improvement?

There are no issues with the solution. I’m happy with the product.

For how long have I used the solution?

We’ve been using the solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable solution if you select the standard sizing. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution can scale well.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is rapid and extremely helpful. Whenever I have questions, they provide feedback very fast.

How was the initial setup?

The product is straightforward to set up and quick to deploy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I’m using the free version of the solution. I do not pay for licensing.

What other advice do I have?

I’m using the latest version of the solution. I’m an end-user of the product.

I’d recommend this solution. You can start to use App Service immediately. You only need to have a subscription. If you would like to test App Service, then you only need to deploy in a free sizing version, and you can get going.

I’d rate the solution ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Azure App Service Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Azure App Service Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.