Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
DGM (Software) at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Offers a good feature set and has a user-friendly look and feel
Pros and Cons
  • "Overall, all of the features are very good."
  • "I am new to the intervention and I find it difficult to find my way around the user interface. I have my own learning tool. However, it could be simpler for new users."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case has been pretty vague so far. Right now, my scope is on DevOps. I'm looking at it from the point of view of having a DevOps platform. We already have a team foundation server and are working from the cloud.

What is most valuable?

For me, the DDT has been very valuable. 

The code is very good. We are using that. We are currently exploring Azure Codes and Artifacts.

Overall, all of the features are very good.

It's a Microsoft solution, so it's very familiar in look and feel.

What needs improvement?

It's too early to really say what features are lacking at this point.

I am new to the intervention and I find it difficult to find my way around the user interface. I have my own learning tool. However, it could be simpler for new users.

The pricing could be a bit less.

For how long have I used the solution?

We haven't been using the solution for too long.

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure App Service
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure App Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far, the solution's stability is very good. We have no complaints.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't found any issues with scalability so far. It's been quite good.

How are customer service and support?

We haven't requested any troubleshooting or help so far, as we haven't used the solution for too long just yet.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment varies, but could take up to one or two months. There are a few things we are currently trying. We were looking for a CATD type of model.

We have our own team that is able to maintain the solution.

What other advice do I have?

We've had a long business relationship with Microsoft. We're partners.

We're still in the process of exploring the solution. However, so far, I would recommend it. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1016565 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
It saves us time and money and installation is really easy
Pros and Cons
  • "The program is stable and we've had no technical issues so far."
  • "I would like to see faster adoption and templates that we can use."

What is our primary use case?

We wanted to build a web application, so we started exploring whether we should do it on-premise or on cloud. We already had an Azure subscription and then we decided to do it on Azure. I like the solution because if you want to do something, even if it is a simple proof of concept, you can use a daily subscription. You can do it within minutes and it makes things move a lot faster compared to traditional data center models.

How has it helped my organization?

With this solution, it takes less time to deploy something. So in terms of timelines and user satisfaction, the users are happy. 

What is most valuable?

I like that you can see everything once you log on to the portals. You can see everything including the pricing of the solution. You know how much it's going to cost your client, how much it is going to cost you monthly or daily and you can even control the usage so that you pay even less. So you have better control over things. 

What needs improvement?

I would like to see faster adoption and maybe they can give you some templates, so that we can deploy something and then modify the template. For instance, having templates for creating a website will make things faster and easier.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for three months now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The program is stable and we've had no technical issues so far.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The program is very scalable and we plan to scale to 600 or 700 users.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We've tried many other options but the problem is we are using a product from a vendor and ideally, this functionality should be made available in that product. But we're using Azure App Service and then give users a temporary solution because we don't want to change the product that they are using because their mobile devices are very old. It's going to be a waste of money when they will any replace it in a year's time. It is more expensive to upgrade that product than developing something cheap on Azure App Service.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward. Deployment is fast if you just want to create a roadmap and the database, but that is if you know what you're doing. If the deployment is too complex, you might want to use an expert to help you. I'm not familiar with the technology and I haven't done web development myself. But I just followed some articles and then did everything myself. So it's not difficult at all. You can also go to Azure's web portal and follow their instructions. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Azure doesn't cost as much as other services. If you want to create something, you can create it all on Azure, simple and quick. If you have to do it on-premise, you have to follow some steps. And you have to pay for providing virtual machines and buy licenses for all the products you are going to use, like Windows or SQL. But on Azure, you can use a trial account so that you can see how it works, or you can use your day subscription, which is a lot cheaper. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We didn't try many other options because we already had an Azure subscription. So it was a very easy decision to make and we didn't explore other options. Our version is a little bit outdated, so we plan on upgrading soon. The next version has all the functionality we are looking for. Our main concern is speed, and that is one of the features we like about Azure.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others would be to occupy the use cases from businesses to see if this works for you. It is really easy. I give this solution a nine out of ten. In the future, I would like to have a template for development, though.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure App Service
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure App Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Chief Analytics Officer at Idiro Analytics
Real User
Still familiarizing ourselves, but the data factory tool has proved to be most beneficial
Pros and Cons
  • "Azure data factory is a good tool."
  • "Lacking somewhat in template data flows."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case of the solution is for ETL. We're slowly moving everything over to Azure, so I think this will be our expected hub for the near future. I'm the chief analytics officer and we are a Microsoft partner.

What is most valuable?

The Azure data factory is the tool we're using the most. And again, we're using it for moving data around and data management. For now, we're pretty happy with the product although we're probably using it in a slightly more limited way. All the tasks we've done would have some reasonable degree of complexity and we've been able to achieve those tasks, or complete those processes. We're still getting familiar with it. 

What needs improvement?

There has been some building of pipelines where we've had to test and redesign a little so if there were maybe some easier to setup guides or more template data flows that would be an improvement. It would simplify the center processes. It would probably be impossible to have a template for everyone, but maybe there's some way to kind of simplify the initial stack and point frame for new users like ourselves, to make getting off the ground a little bit easier.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for almost a year. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. We don't have very large data volumes and we haven't yet migrated high data processing power onto the cloud. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't been attempting to push the boundaries in scalability. It's probably something we will gradually get to, maybe over the next six to 12 months where we will be migrating some additional processes and workload onto the cloud that we may start to see if scalability becomes an issue.

How are customer service and technical support?

We haven't yet needed to contact technical support. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was reasonably straightforward. We've kind of been taking slow steps and migrating requirements as we gradually move certain tasks or certain processes into the cloud. We've done all the deployment ourselves. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think at the moment we're spending less than USD $100 a month. Because we're a Microsoft partner, we get a certain amount of credit on our partner account, but I don't think we've spent more than about $100, maybe $200 in a single month.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend the product. I would suggest giving yourself time to learn and adapt to the product. A lot of people would probably come to it having some historic or some existing software product in place and they're maybe migrating onto it. And so it will likely involve changing or redesigning how some existing process works. It's a good time to kind of learn some of the intricacies or the way Azure operates that might be slightly different to what they do on-premise. Ultimately it seems like it can do anything that you might be doing with a different tool or in a different location. It's just a matter of figuring out the configurations and the process.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer2226693 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Top 5
With features like auto-scaling and SSL integration, the tool also offers stability at an affordable price
Pros and Cons
  • "Some of the features I found valuable are auto-scaling, SSL integration, cost-effectiveness, and the certificates provided by Microsoft Azure App Service."
  • "When trying to scale up, it has a limitation, specifically an upper limitation. In general, scalability should be improved."

What is our primary use case?

Our clients use Microsoft Azure App Service for running their websites. The tool also has Azure Functions, which work in coordination with App Service. Azure Functions and Azure Logic Apps are different objects in Azure, but they all work together. I don't know details about how Microsoft Azure App Service works.

What is most valuable?

Some of the features I found valuable are auto-scaling, SSL integration, cost-effectiveness, and the certificates provided by Microsoft Azure App Service.

What needs improvement?

Sizing is an area where Microsoft Azure App Service lacks, so it should be made possible to upscale. When trying to scale up, it has a limitation, specifically an upper limitation. In general, scalability should be improved.

The features we use in Microsoft Azure App Service are thirty percent of the tool's services. There are a lot of other options. There's nothing that I can think of that we wanted to configure or the client wanted that was not there in App Service. Nothing needs to be added to the solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have experience with Microsoft Azure App Service. My company has a partnership with Microsoft. Microsoft Azure App Service doesn't have versions.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten. The product doesn't have stability problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure App Service is used by 200 users in my business. We use the product as a part of medium-sized healthcare businesses.

How are customer service and support?

Support is somewhat of an issue with Microsoft Azure App Service. I rate the support a seven out of ten.


How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

As a part of my company's partnership with Microsoft, I was involved in the implementation process of Microsoft Azure App Service.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is the difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase, I rate the setup phase a nine and a half out of ten. The setup process of Microsoft Azure App Service is relatively easier and less complex.

It took me a couple of days to deploy the solution, including deploying a few solutions.

We had to go through with the development team and the client's team to understand the flow of their application, including the logic, and all other different components, having a dependency on Microsoft Azure App Service for the setup phase. We also had to understand how it would function, and then we had to devise a strategy accordingly. We enabled the firewall and communication since, obviously, the traffic should have to go through a firewall, after which we can configure routing and firewall rules accordingly.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a five. The product is affordable.

There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

The prices are dependent on the size of the solution required. If there is a need for auto-scaling, then the charges increase as per the size.

I don't see any con for this solution. The only thing is that if the website is huge, like that of Amazon or Flipkart, where auto-scaling may be considered, causing a need to test if Microsoft Azure App Service can cater to that much workload.

What other advice do I have?

Even with all of its limitations, Microsoft Azure App Service is good.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Business Intelligence Manager at a consumer goods company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good Data Factory features and good scalability but the stability could be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "The product is scalable."
  • "The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."

What is most valuable?

The Data Factory is very good, as is the SSIS, which I also use on the cloud.

What needs improvement?

The cost of the solution needs improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We're still testing the product. We occasionally have some problems and get some errors. Right now, we have a lot of issues with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is scalable.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them.

What other advice do I have?

We use the cloud deployment model.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. There are other solutions that seem to be okay as well. Windows, for example, has a good protocol. There's also AWS, but it's just on the cloud.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
CTO at Tikean Ltd
Real User
Beneficial automatic upgrades, helpful support, but complex implementation
Pros and Cons
  • "The technical support from Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
  • "The logging and monitoring could improve in Microsoft Azure App Service."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is the automatic upgrades.

What needs improvement?

The logging and monitoring could improve in Microsoft Azure App Service.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft Azure App Service for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Microsoft Azure App Service is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There should be more scaling options in Microsoft Azure App Service.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support from Microsoft Azure App Service is good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of the Microsoft Azure App Service is complicated.

What about the implementation team?

We have more than one person that handles the maintenance of the Microsoft Azure App Service.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Microsoft Azure App Service a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior Software Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
An easy to use solution with good infrastructure
Pros and Cons
  • "It's very easy to use. That's one of the advantages for the business, that you don't need to struggle to configure your website and your app service. Microsoft made sure to make it stable and very easy to configure."
  • "Sometimes we face problems, but those are technical problems in Microsoft, bugs or something doesn't work as expected, but that's normal."

What is most valuable?

Azure App Service is a fully managed Platform as a Service (PaaS) that integrates bunch of services into a single service. One of its valuable service is Azure Web Apps that helps to develop and deploy enterprise-ready web applications. Microsoft Azure will take care of application deployment and management, while the developer only needs to concentrate on app development.

What needs improvement?

It is not unsual that we run into problems related to the deployment and post-installation. But Azure team is aware of these issues and continuously keeps improving the Azure stack.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Microsoft provides a lot of scalability in all their services. Microsoft provides services and infrastructure, but for full scalability, the maker should take into consideration the scalability of the app home. The full scalability Microsoft provides is a way to scale up and scale up in your environment. But it doesn't take responsibility to make your web application scalable or not. It helps you to scale up, but it doesn't take care of your application's scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support from Microsoft is very good at all levels.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not too simple but not too complex. The interface makes it easy to use if you have known it for a while. For me, it's easy because I've already gotten used to it. But it could be, complex if you haven't.

The initial setup level of difficulty is dependent on what you want exactly. To set up a website on the app service, for example, is very easy for a simple website because all you need is to develop your website, build it with the Visual Studio, and configure. Once you want to deploy to app service, once you finish, it's only one button you click and everything will be deployed. It's very easy.

Deployment depends on how big your website is, so I cannot say exactly how long it will take in every case, but it is quite fast. It depends what are you sending, how many megabytes you're sending to the app service, but the app service is very fast. If you have a small website, just a few megabytes, 2, 3, 4, megabytes, you will see that it is very fast, but if you have a website with a lot of updates that takes probably five minutes, or ten minutes. That's because you need to push data to push the files to app service. The thing that I can tell you about the in-app service is that because the in-app service normally uses clocks, that means you have a development environment, staging and production environment, the customer can push more into the development environment or staging and then swap. And to swap is quite fast as well. That's the only bottleneck that is possible but Microsoft guarantees no downtime.

Most of the time we configure the ICG configuration and we put the effort in at the beginning to set up the pipeline and want to set it up so that it works automatically, so if you want to start a push code or anything will be deployed automatically. That way, fewer people are required down the road.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The benefits and costs of the Azure App Service plan varies between different tiers of web apps. It is free if you choose the Free and Shared plans app service. These plans are good only for development and testing purposes. So, before you start setting up your app service plans with multiple apps, make sure you are aware of how your chosen plan implements this.

What other advice do I have?

Azure App Service is too easy to setup and appropriate for developers with no knowledge in infrastructure.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1419714 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Stable with an easy initial setup and good infrastructure
Pros and Cons
  • "It's a platform as a service, so we don't have to manage the infrastructure to hold the websites."
  • "The solution needs better integration capabilities on the network side."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution to create a website. Azure will provide infrastructure without any servers and can provide service to host the websites of the company.

What is most valuable?

The reason that we are using the product is for the stability that they have.

It's a platform as a service, so we don't have to manage the infrastructure to hold the websites. We use it more for the confidence that it's going to be up and running and is easier for us to maintain.

What needs improvement?

The network side needs improvement. It has to be more stable. Sometimes we have issues with the network side when we expand the solution. You need to find stability in order to expand the solution properly. When we do that, or we add another app service through the app service plan, we have issues with the network, and we lose communication between our data center and the app service.

The solution needs better integration capabilities on the network side. There should be more options, for example, to update the DNS server, straight to the app service.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for six months. It's been less than a year, so it hasn't been too long.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability isn't as good as we need it to be on the network side. When we try to expand, we run into problems with the network. However, in general, we find the solution fairly stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is affected by the stability of the solution which isn't perfect. You definitely need multiple resources in order to scale effectively.

We have about 500 users on the website at this point. It's new, so people are just getting there.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is pretty good. Overall, I'd rate it eight out of ten. 

We have their premier support. I've found that the response is getting slower on some cases. They could be faster, however, that's something that's always on the support team. Everyone always wants faster answers.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward. The best part is how quickly you can deploy the solution. It's just two or three clicks and you are up and running.

Overall, the deployment is good as, apart from this viable network, we have actually a 90.999% of it up and running.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Azure is a pay-as-you-go type of service. It's my understanding that the pricing is okay, however, it's not an issue I deal with directly.

What other advice do I have?

We're a Microsoft partner.

I'd advise other users just to be sure that they have all of the components on the Azure side in order to do the hybrid configuration. From my experience, that will give you better performance if you have everything on there. That, and it will be totally clear and you won't mix anything up with some private stuff.

Overall, I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user