Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.6
Microsoft Azure App Service delivers cost-effective operational efficiency, reducing workforce needs and streamlining implementation through automation and machine learning.
Sentiment score
7.8
Organizations using Temenos Quantum report increased development efficiency, cost savings, improved security, seamless integration, and scalable architecture benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
Microsoft Azure App Service support gets mixed reviews; premier packages offer swift help, but response times and consistency vary.
Sentiment score
5.7
Temenos Quantum's support is generally helpful with a good ticketing system, but response times and experiences vary.
Microsoft provides support for a lot of add-on or customized integration requests.
Regions like Europe, the US, Canada, and India provide very good and immediate support.
While contacting support is not always a pleasant experience, they attended to our needs satisfactorily.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Microsoft Azure App Service offers strong scalability and flexibility, accommodating various organization sizes with easy resource adjustments and high user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.0
Temenos Quantum is praised for scalability and performance, supporting 100-1000 users, despite some complexity concerns compared to Flutter or React.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Azure App Service is highly stable with 99.99% uptime, supporting business needs effectively despite minor configuration issues.
Sentiment score
7.5
Temenos Quantum is stable and reliable with frequent updates, but areas like pending applications and front-end need improvement.
This feature allows us to pinpoint very quickly what is happening when an application is not working correctly.
I find Microsoft Azure App Service to be quite stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure App Service needs improvements in deployment, integration, UI/UX, cost transparency, and support for better user experience.
Temenos Quantum requires security, interface, and stability enhancements, better integration, faster support, flexible widgets, and improved development tools.
Deploying Logic Apps in a private network environment becomes complicated due to the extensive white testing and configurations needed at the networking layer.
They should improve the learning curve, enhance documentation, and focus on best practices.
The Linux App Service should be more user-friendly, focusing on logging, troubleshooting, and similar features.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure App Service provides flexible pricing plans, generally cost-effective, though high for advanced tiers; free trials are available.
Temenos Quantum is costly, with prices ranging from $70,000 to $500,000, though some users find it affordable.
It is an expensive product, primarily due to the licensing fees.
Pricing is a concern.
If you need to host three, four, or five nodes with high availability, everything is included in the price.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure App Service provides scalable, secure, and cost-effective solutions with seamless integration and robust DevOps capabilities for flexibility and efficiency.
Temenos Quantum is valued for its user-friendliness, customizability, integration, security, and comprehensive mobile and web development features.
The best features of Microsoft Azure App Service are its capacity for scalability, security, and basic support functionalities.
We use the CI/CD inside Azure DevOps and Azure DevOps deploys the applications in Microsoft Azure App Service.
The integration capabilities of Microsoft Azure App Service have greatly enhanced my ability to handle global web operations and support various functions, which were previously challenging without such integration.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure App Service
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
4th
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
8th
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
20th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (3rd), Low-Code Development Platforms (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Mobile Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 4.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 6.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Azure App Service4.6%
Temenos Quantum6.1%
Other89.3%
Mobile Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

AntonioNascimento - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless integration and application hosting enabled through versatile service
When using a Linux App Service or containerized App Services, the logging is not as good as when using the Windows version. The Linux App Service should be more user-friendly, focusing on logging, troubleshooting, and similar features. With Microsoft Azure App Service, it is more difficult with Linux or other container solutions because there are many options. When creating an App Service, you can create it as Linux or Windows. After that, you can choose some stack or use Docker to container. When using Linux with container, the logging functionality is not as robust.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
6%
Performing Arts
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise33
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?
I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure App Service?
One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process.
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
 

Also Known As

Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.