Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
OutSystems boosts ROI up to 90%, speeds development, and reduces costs, but skilled developers and annual fees can impact returns.
Sentiment score
7.8
Organizations using Temenos Quantum report increased development efficiency, cost savings, improved security, seamless integration, and scalable architecture benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
OutSystems' customer service is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some users note delays and technical support improvement needs.
Sentiment score
5.6
Temenos Quantum's support is generally helpful with a good ticketing system, but response times and experiences vary.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
OutSystems offers impressive scalability, seamlessly handling large back-ends across platforms, though better specifications than recommended may be required.
Sentiment score
7.1
Temenos Quantum is praised for scalability and performance, supporting 100-1000 users, despite some complexity concerns compared to Flutter or React.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems is praised for stability and performance, though some note issues under heavy loads or with high user volumes.
Sentiment score
7.5
Temenos Quantum is stable and reliable with frequent updates, but areas like pending applications and front-end need improvement.
 

Room For Improvement

Users request better containerization, integration, language support, and improvements in performance, documentation, UI development, and automation features.
Temenos Quantum requires security, interface, and stability enhancements, better integration, faster support, flexible widgets, and improved development tools.
 

Setup Cost

OutSystems is costly and suited for large enterprises, with prices from $4,000 to €170,000 annually, including user licenses and infrastructure.
Temenos Quantum is costly, with prices ranging from $70,000 to $500,000, though some users find it affordable.
 

Valuable Features

OutSystems offers rapid development, integration, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, unifying front and backend services to boost productivity.
Temenos Quantum is valued for its user-friendliness, customizability, integration, security, and comprehensive mobile and web development features.
 

Categories and Ranking

OutSystems
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
1st
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
3rd
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
10th
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
19th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
16th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Mobile Development Platforms category, the mindshare of OutSystems is 21.2%, down from 22.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 2.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Vadivelan Rajendiran - PeerSpot reviewer
The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend
The solution is ground up, it follows exactly what the developer does. The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided. Infusing AI that would automate the process would be game-changing. On a logical level, if data on a form is automated, it would be great if when required, the developer can then go and look for it.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
32%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
39%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
 

Also Known As

No data available
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.