Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Android SDK vs Temenos Quantum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Android SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (9th), Rapid Application Development Software (19th), Low-Code Development Platforms (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Android SDK is 21.3%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 28, 2023
A stable and scalable product that offers ease of coding and designing to build applications
There isn't a need for any improvement in Android SDK since they provide users with two or three updates in a year, making it quite stable. The security part in Android SDK depends on how you build an application using the tool so you can apply some security to your application. The reason why Temenos Quantum is the best security tool is because it uses a middleware named Fabric, so the APIs are connected from Fabric to Temenos Quantum. The middleware offered by Temenos is really strong. If I compare the security offered by Android to that of Temenos Quantum, Android will lose in terms of security. You can create a secure application with Android SDK. The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made. I don't think Android SDK needs to add any features because they give updates frequently.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 28, 2023
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a stable product."
"Supports mobile and IOT devices."
"I have found the functions related to the services to the community for applications to be the most valuable."
"The best thing about Android SDK is its extensive graphics compared to iOS."
"The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature."
"Android SDK is very scalable, secure, and fast...It is a completely stable solution that has been working for many years."
"The look, ease of use, sturdiness, and reliability are excellent."
"Android SDK's best feature is its ease of use."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms.​"
"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
 

Cons

"The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made."
"There are security issues in the Android platform."
"It would be nice to get fewer updates."
"Android SDK could use some new features, for example, picture-in-picture."
"Google has a monopoly on tools for Android app development, so Android SDK is the only choice available."
"The security implementation is the only area of concern in Android SDK where a bit of enhancements can help."
"The development environment of Android SDK could improve."
"We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer."
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Android SDK is essentially an open-source product on which anybody can work."
"Android SDK can be cheap and can go high in terms of prices, and it all depends on who the customers are and what kind of application you want. One application may cost 5,000 USD and can go up from 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 USD."
"I am using the free version of Android SDK."
"Many countries, even those with fewer resources, prefer using Android SDK because it is cheap."
"It is an open-source platform."
"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."
"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."
"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."
"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"
"It is expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
39%
Computer Software Company
15%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Android SDK?
The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with Android SDK?
We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer. There are some limitations on Google Play Store availability as well. These particular areas need improve...
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
 

Also Known As

No data available
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Android SDK vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.