Axway Appcelerator vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"Enables me to use the same web technology to develop cross-platform native apps. The cloud-based one-click app build system is a valuable feature as well."

"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."

"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."

"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"Scalability is not so good if you have a complex UX."

"It would be awesome if they would work on improving the speed of the app building process."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"

"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."

"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"It is expensive solution."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."