Axway Appcelerator vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"Enables me to use the same web technology to develop cross-platform native apps. The cloud-based one-click app build system is a valuable feature as well."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms.​"

"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."

"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."

"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."

"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"It would be awesome if they would work on improving the speed of the app building process."

"Scalability is not so good if you have a complex UX."

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"It is expensive solution."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."