Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure App Service vs ServiceNow Now Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Azure App Service is efficient and cost-effective, reducing resource needs and simplifying implementation with machine learning features.
Sentiment score
6.8
ServiceNow provides ROI through metrics, AI tools, and efficiency, benefiting larger enterprises despite cost concerns for smaller ones.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Feedback on Microsoft Azure App Service support varies, with praise for premium help but complaints about regional response inconsistencies.
Sentiment score
7.2
ServiceNow technical support is highly rated but lacks in basic support, often relying on internal teams for quick assistance.
Regions like Europe, the US, Canada, and India provide very good and immediate support.
Microsoft provides support for a lot of add-on or customized integration requests.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure App Service provides scalable solutions with accessible tiered pricing, requiring some configuration for optimal performance and expandability.
Sentiment score
7.9
ServiceNow Now Platform is scalable, integrates seamlessly, supports thousands of users, and offers flexibility with straightforward licensing.
Users can build and modify the platform according to their needs.
It is easily scalable and very powerful in this direction.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure App Service is praised for stability and strong performance, with minor network or configuration issues occasionally reported.
Sentiment score
8.4
EMEA users praise ServiceNow Now Platform for 99.9% reliability, consistent uptime, multilingual support, and seamless daily performance.
I find Microsoft Azure App Service to be quite stable.
I haven't had any situations where it would be unavailable for our calls, so I don't have complaints there.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure App Service requires enhanced templates, integration, cost clarity, UI, logging, monitoring, AI functions, and multi-language support.
ServiceNow users seek better licensing clarity, UI, integration, programming support, and technical support due to cost and customization issues.
Deploying Logic Apps in a private network environment becomes complicated due to the extensive white testing and configurations needed at the networking layer.
Microsoft's support and technical aspects like installation complexity could use enhancement.
I would like to see enhancements in the AI functions, specifically in the AI co-pilot within Azure.
Historical data isn't as easily available as expected and it requires buying additional licenses for more features.
It lacks support for rollbacks in case of complex customer processes.
The user interface could be modernized and made more attractive for users.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure App Service offers scalable, competitive pricing with both free and paid plans, suitable for various business needs.
ServiceNow is costly due to variable licensing and module fees, making it less flexible for smaller organizations.
It is an expensive product, primarily due to the licensing fees.
Pricing is a concern.
If I compare this solution to AWS, it's cheaper, so it's better.
ServiceNow Now Platform is an expensive product.
ServiceNow Now Platform falls within the more expensive tier of a product.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure App Service enhances global web operations with scalability, ease of deployment, integration, and serverless architecture for diverse needs.
ServiceNow Platform enhances efficiency with workflow automation, integration, scalability, and user-friendly interfaces for comprehensive service management.
The integration capabilities of Microsoft Azure App Service have greatly enhanced my ability to handle global web operations and support various functions, which were previously challenging without such integration.
The product is easy to maintain and deploy.
Azure App Service has several features that are valuable, including its scalability and seamless integration with other systems, which support flexibility.
It is extremely powerful and very much customizable, which allows for quick building of solutions around it.
The text-to-code feature is particularly useful for turning natural language instructions into recognizable code on the ServiceNow platform, aiding both implementation teams and customers.
The most valuable features are the ease of use, stability, and the ability to change or upgrade seamlessly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure App Service
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (4th)
ServiceNow Now Platform
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (8th), No-Code Development Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 3.3%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Now Platform is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Sharjeel Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you manage security more efficiently, and supports multiple frameworks, but has limited multi-language support and integration
Limited integration is an area for improvement in Microsoft Azure App Service. Another area for improvement in the platform is multi-language support. That still needs to be added because, at the moment, my team still has to work on specific Python languages whenever the API calls need to be configured. The pricing tier for Microsoft Azure App Service also has room for improvement because it significantly varies. For example, you have premium and dynamic pricing, and people on P2 should be offered dynamic pricing or the high-priced tier on offer could still be worked on. I want a lifecycle pipeline feature, similar to Azure Pipelines from Microsoft Azure App Service. For example, when configuring the pipelines, I should be able to configure the cloud security posture for a specific deployment. By default, there should be a prebuilt cloud security option that can be configured before moving into the production environment. Microsoft Azure App Service should also give you a clue regarding the risks. It would be best if you didn't have to connect to other modules because that wouldn't be as beneficial to platform users, mainly because Microsoft Azure App Service has a lot of security development kits.
Fabio QUINTANILHA - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for seamless integration and sharing of common features
The initial setup is straightforward. There are limited access. If you choose not to use scripts, you can still configure the majority of the settings on the platform. The technical aspect of implementing changes is governed by change management processes. Even simple features require careful consideration of communication, documentation, and governance. Despite the setup being relatively straightforward and typically taking one to two weeks to complete once the desired outcome is identified, the implementation phase can often extend for a month or two due to various factors. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?
I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure App Service?
One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process.
What do you like most about ServiceNow Now Platform?
The integration with other tools is pretty good.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Now Platform?
The analytics should be more readily available on the base product. Historical data isn't as easily available as expected and it requires buying additional licenses for more features.
 

Also Known As

Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount
experian, beachbody, health partners
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure App Service vs. ServiceNow Now Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.