Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hyland OnBase vs ServiceNow Now Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
ServiceNow Now Platform benefits larger companies with efficiency and AI, while smaller businesses struggle with cost justification.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Hyland OnBase's support is praised for availability but can require pressure, extra cost, and experiences delays in ticket resolution.
Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow's technical support is highly rated for responsiveness and expertise, though basic support needs improvement according to some.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Hyland OnBase supports scalable growth for businesses, efficiently managing increased users and documents while maintaining performance and enterprise workflows.
Sentiment score
7.9
ServiceNow Now Platform is highly scalable, supporting diverse businesses with robust customization, despite occasional vendor dependencies and API challenges.
Users can build and modify the platform according to their needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Hyland OnBase is a stable, reliable, low-maintenance application, performing smoothly with correct hardware and adequate RAM setup.
Sentiment score
8.3
ServiceNow Now Platform is stable and reliable, with high user ratings despite occasional upgrade and integration issues.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
 

Room For Improvement

Hyland OnBase needs UI updates, pricing adjustments, better training, modernized web client, improved support, security, and AI-driven features.
ServiceNow needs improvements in licensing, usability, integration, AI capabilities, customization, pricing, and multilingual support to enhance its appeal.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Historical data isn't as easily available as expected and it requires buying additional licenses for more features.
It lacks support for rollbacks in case of complex customer processes.
 

Setup Cost

Hyland OnBase offers modular pricing, seen as costly, with varied licensing options and potential regional pricing adjustments needed.
ServiceNow's licensing is costly but often justified by its features, making it suitable for large enterprises.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
ServiceNow Now Platform is an expensive product.
 

Valuable Features

Hyland OnBase offers flexibility, security, integration, and comprehensive features with scalability and stability, supporting extensive content management.
ServiceNow Now Platform excels in IT service management with workflow automation, seamless integration, and robust analytics, enhancing organizational efficiency.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The text-to-code feature is particularly useful for turning natural language instructions into recognizable code on the ServiceNow platform, aiding both implementation teams and customers.
The most valuable features are the ease of use, stability, and the ability to change or upgrade seamlessly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)
ServiceNow Now Platform
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Now Platform is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Fabio QUINTANILHA - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for seamless integration and sharing of common features
The initial setup is straightforward. There are limited access. If you choose not to use scripts, you can still configure the majority of the settings on the platform. The technical aspect of implementing changes is governed by change management processes. Even simple features require careful consideration of communication, documentation, and governance. Despite the setup being relatively straightforward and typically taking one to two weeks to complete once the desired outcome is identified, the implementation phase can often extend for a month or two due to various factors. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
As we had an enterprise license, we were not limited in terms of user access. We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application. The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing in...
What do you like most about ServiceNow Now Platform?
The integration with other tools is pretty good.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Now Platform?
The analytics should be more readily available on the base product. Historical data isn't as easily available as expected and it requires buying additional licenses for more features.
 

Also Known As

OnBase
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
experian, beachbody, health partners
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. ServiceNow Now Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.