Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hyland OnBase vs OpenText Documentum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Hyland OnBase's support is praised for availability but can require pressure, extra cost, and experiences delays in ticket resolution.
Sentiment score
6.0
OpenText's customer service is improving, though users experience occasional delays and limited support for older versions.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
My involvement was not only user level, but development integration level also.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
Hyland OnBase needs UI updates, pricing adjustments, better training, modernized web client, improved support, security, and AI-driven features.
Sentiment score
5.1
OpenText Documentum faces challenges with outdated interface, performance, integration, customization, scalability, pricing, documentation, and AI integration.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
It would be beneficial to have more ability to customize features for specific use cases.
After implementation, I was pleased with the functions of the application.
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Hyland OnBase supports scalable growth for businesses, efficiently managing increased users and documents while maintaining performance and enterprise workflows.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum excels in scalability, supporting numerous users and offering integration flexibility for large-scale implementations.
Never had to scale to meet demand.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Hyland OnBase offers modular pricing, seen as costly, with varied licensing options and potential regional pricing adjustments needed.
Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Documentum's pricing is high, complex, and varies, though recent improvements offer affordability and benefits for government agencies.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
Overall, it offers a lot of functionalities for the price point.
It is quite expensive.
The licensing price is quite high.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Hyland OnBase is a stable, reliable, low-maintenance application, performing smoothly with correct hardware and adequate RAM setup.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum is stable and reliable, with minor sub-product issues, earning high user ratings in the ECM market.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
after the deployment, we found the system to be reliable.
For example, database connections could be improved.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.2
Hyland OnBase offers flexibility, security, integration, and comprehensive features with scalability and stability, supporting extensive content management.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText Documentum ensures secure, scalable content management with integration, versioning, and compliance, supporting efficient business processes across departments.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications.
Bulk document edit
The product is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Low-Code Development Platforms (14th)
OpenText Documentum
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 6.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum is 11.8%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Kabir Jakkamsetti - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used to automate the storage of metadata and content, but it add some AI integrations
I think security's been pretty good with OpenText Documentum. Currently, we are on an older product, and we are about to start a migration. I think the configurability should be much more improved with that. OpenText Documentum has helped boost productivity within our organization. By automating a lot of business processes with workflows, we've been able to improve productivity. OpenText Documentum has definitely helped simplify or accelerate our modernization journey. Overall, I rate OpenText Documentum a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
The solution costs around $5,000 per month. It is very relative.
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
The solution’s initial setup is a little complex. The look and feel need improvement as well.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?
It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad.
What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?
The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The main thing is the cost. Most of the time, organizations move away from Documentum due to cost. It's highly-priced, and the support costs are high. Now, SharePoint and other options. Microsoft g...
 

Also Known As

OnBase
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.