Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Mar 27, 2025
I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco ( /products/alfresco-reviews ) and Nuxeo ( /products/nuxeo-reviews ). Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
Nov 11, 2024
We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application. The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private
Real User
Top 10
Jul 18, 2024
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Dec 8, 2022
The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market. That said, it depends on the use case that the customer has. They need to focus on security for financial organizations and healthcare domains that are using it. For them, while the current dashboards are meeting their needs, the market is changing. They do need some transformation on top of it. In terms of reporting, we don't have anything on the artificial intelligence side. For example, if one of my customers is uploading their invoice, they have an OCR feature which is known as Optical Character Recognition, and their system does read those things; however, in this solution, they don't have a mechanism, as of now, to improve it further. Therefore, if I have uploaded an invoice that includes my name, it should be able to suggest to me that there are other documents that already have this name in them. The search engines could use some artificial intelligence to make the solution much, much better. If I'm using Google, and if I try to search for a name with a string, it will show me all the files which are coming with the name, which are all the listings of the files, before I add the complete name. Then it will start displaying the list of files. The search functionality in this product should offer a similar approach and make suggestions based on what you are typing. The troubleshooting guidelines could be more clear during the initial setup.
Manager of Information Systems at University of the Witwatersrand
Real User
Jul 13, 2022
We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution. We do have a barcoding solution but the main challenge we need to overcome is identifying duplicates.
An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution.
Technical Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
Jan 9, 2021
For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco ( /products/alfresco-reviews ) and Nuxeo ( /products/nuxeo-reviews ). Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application. The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
The solution’s initial setup is a little complex. The look and feel need improvement as well.
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.
The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market. That said, it depends on the use case that the customer has. They need to focus on security for financial organizations and healthcare domains that are using it. For them, while the current dashboards are meeting their needs, the market is changing. They do need some transformation on top of it. In terms of reporting, we don't have anything on the artificial intelligence side. For example, if one of my customers is uploading their invoice, they have an OCR feature which is known as Optical Character Recognition, and their system does read those things; however, in this solution, they don't have a mechanism, as of now, to improve it further. Therefore, if I have uploaded an invoice that includes my name, it should be able to suggest to me that there are other documents that already have this name in them. The search engines could use some artificial intelligence to make the solution much, much better. If I'm using Google, and if I try to search for a name with a string, it will show me all the files which are coming with the name, which are all the listings of the files, before I add the complete name. Then it will start displaying the list of files. The search functionality in this product should offer a similar approach and make suggestions based on what you are typing. The troubleshooting guidelines could be more clear during the initial setup.
We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution. We do have a barcoding solution but the main challenge we need to overcome is identifying duplicates.
An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution.
The look and feel could be better!!!
For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.