Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Documentum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
IBM FileNet support is generally praised, but some users face delays and inconsistency, seeking improved skill and responsiveness.
Sentiment score
6.0
OpenText's customer service is improving, though users experience occasional delays and limited support for older versions.
People come from all over the world, and they have specialists at the other end of the world to help if needed.
The product-level support is better now than before.
My involvement was not only user level, but development integration level also.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.3
IBM FileNet needs enhanced cloud integration, improved usability, better automation, cost efficiency, and advanced analytics for user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
5.1
OpenText Documentum faces challenges with outdated interface, performance, integration, customization, scalability, pricing, documentation, and AI integration.
The response time and resolution of issues by technical support need improvement.
There are only a few products large enterprises can choose from, and it doesn't really matter which one as it often depends on the consultants and the team implementing the solution.
It would be beneficial to have more ability to customize features for specific use cases.
After implementation, I was pleased with the functions of the application.
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
IBM FileNet offers scalable, adaptable infrastructure, supporting diverse business sizes with efficient integration and consistent performance for dynamic environments.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum excels in scalability, supporting numerous users and offering integration flexibility for large-scale implementations.
The bigger products like IBM FileNet can handle billions of documents and thousands of users.
Never had to scale to meet demand.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM FileNet is costly with high licensing and setup fees, suitable for larger enterprises, but often expensive for smaller businesses.
Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Documentum's pricing is high, complex, and varies, though recent improvements offer affordability and benefits for government agencies.
The price is high, with yearly subscriptions increasing day by day.
FileNet and similar enterprise-level tools require substantial costs, starting in the millions.
Overall, it offers a lot of functionalities for the price point.
It is quite expensive.
The licensing price is quite high.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
IBM FileNet offers stable performance, minimal downtime, and improved stability in recent versions, ensuring user satisfaction and consistent operation.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum is stable and reliable, with minor sub-product issues, earning high user ratings in the ECM market.
In terms of stability, we haven't experienced any big technical issues or downtime with IBM FileNet.
after the deployment, we found the system to be reliable.
For example, database connections could be improved.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM FileNet provides scalable, high-performance content management, automation, and seamless integration, praised for reliability, security, and enterprise capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText Documentum ensures secure, scalable content management with integration, versioning, and compliance, supporting efficient business processes across departments.
At this level, companies don't buy a ready-made solution.
The main features we find impactful are the workflow and document management along with FileNet file stores.
The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications.
Document annotation
The product is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Documentum
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.2%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum is 11.8%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

WolfgangPichler - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a compact solution for midsized companies
IBM does not do very good marketing for FileNet. Initially, after IBM acquired the product, there was good marketing support, but this has dwindled as IBM has lost personnel. More could be done to highlight the benefits to customers. Additionally, there are no visually appealing interfaces or apps for the product, which can influence customer buying decisions.
Kabir Jakkamsetti - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used to automate the storage of metadata and content, but it add some AI integrations
I think security's been pretty good with OpenText Documentum. Currently, we are on an older product, and we are about to start a migration. I think the configurability should be much more improved with that. OpenText Documentum has helped boost productivity within our organization. By automating a lot of business processes with workflows, we've been able to improve productivity. OpenText Documentum has definitely helped simplify or accelerate our modernization journey. Overall, I rate OpenText Documentum a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?
It depends on the business partner providing the solution to the customer. We have an ESA contract with IBM which allows us to offer the solution at a competitive price, providing added value when ...
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The setup process is very complex, and I would prefer if it were easier. A modern interface would also be an enhancement.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?
It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad.
What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?
The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The main thing is the cost. Most of the time, organizations move away from Documentum due to cost. It's highly-priced, and the support costs are high. Now, SharePoint and other options. Microsoft g...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Documentum and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.