Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alfresco vs OpenText Documentum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Alfresco offers helpful customer service, albeit slow technical support; community forums and Hyland training are also beneficial.
Sentiment score
6.0
OpenText's customer service is improving, though users experience occasional delays and limited support for older versions.
My involvement was not only user level, but development integration level also.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.2
Alfresco needs improved user interface intuitiveness, developer tools, NoSQL integration, Office 365 support, and better configuration options.
Sentiment score
5.1
OpenText Documentum faces challenges with outdated interface, performance, integration, customization, scalability, pricing, documentation, and AI integration.
It would be beneficial to have more ability to customize features for specific use cases.
After implementation, I was pleased with the functions of the application.
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Alfresco offers robust scalability and high availability with seamless clustering and efficient metadata management for disaster recovery.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum excels in scalability, supporting numerous users and offering integration flexibility for large-scale implementations.
Never had to scale to meet demand.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Alfresco provides a free Community Edition and a scalable Enterprise Edition with per-server licensing for advanced features.
Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Documentum's pricing is high, complex, and varies, though recent improvements offer affordability and benefits for government agencies.
Overall, it offers a lot of functionalities for the price point.
It is quite expensive.
The licensing price is quite high.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Alfresco is stable but benefits from experienced administrators, correct settings, and appropriate architecture to handle high demands.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum is stable and reliable, with minor sub-product issues, earning high user ratings in the ECM market.
after the deployment, we found the system to be reliable.
For example, database connections could be improved.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Alfresco offers document management, customization, collaboration, and search features, appreciated for ease of use and extensibility.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText Documentum ensures secure, scalable content management with integration, versioning, and compliance, supporting efficient business processes across departments.
The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications.
Version Tree Branching allows for simultaneous collaborative work on different versions of a document.
The product is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Alfresco
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
3.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (4th)
OpenText Documentum
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Alfresco is 7.6%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum is 11.8%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Karthi Keyan - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft
I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen. Alfresco also needs to be well-integrated with Microsoft, as it's currently a nuisance for customers who rely on Microsoft's Office 365 solutions. There's a pretty obvious gap in the overlap between SharePoint when customers go to O365 and are presented with the SharePoint license and storage to start with, which Alfresco isn't taking advantage of.
Kabir Jakkamsetti - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used to automate the storage of metadata and content, but it add some AI integrations
I think security's been pretty good with OpenText Documentum. Currently, we are on an older product, and we are about to start a migration. I think the configurability should be much more improved with that. OpenText Documentum has helped boost productivity within our organization. By automating a lot of business processes with workflows, we've been able to improve productivity. OpenText Documentum has definitely helped simplify or accelerate our modernization journey. Overall, I rate OpenText Documentum a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Would Alfresco give an organization more benefits in terms of cost, features & security as compared to Sharepoint?
Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools. Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good. Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent. Document Management 4.12...
What needs improvement with Alfresco?
The configuration of Alfresco is a big challenge. The index fields and their values are not intuitive, making it difficult to find documents. You often need a cross-reference document to navigate c...
What is your primary use case for Alfresco?
I use Alfresco primarily to look up documents. However, it is not as user-friendly as the previous solution, Nautilus, which I was more familiar with due to my involvement in its configuration and ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?
It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad.
What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?
The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The main thing is the cost. Most of the time, organizations move away from Documentum due to cost. It's highly-priced, and the support costs are high. Now, SharePoint and other options. Microsoft g...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Over 1,300 companies from 180 different countries. Including EuroStar, Saks Fifth Avenue, NASA Langley Research Center, and KLM.
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about Alfresco vs. OpenText Documentum and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.