Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hyland OnBase vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Hyland OnBase's support is praised for availability but can require pressure, extra cost, and experiences delays in ticket resolution.
Sentiment score
6.5
Microsoft Power Apps support is mixed; helpful for some, but inconsistent and lacking depth, with community resources praised.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
Hyland OnBase needs UI updates, pricing adjustments, better training, modernized web client, improved support, security, and AI-driven features.
Sentiment score
5.6
Microsoft Power Apps needs better integration, user interfaces, data handling, third-party connectivity, customization, support, training, and simplified licensing.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
The integration of Microsoft's autonomous AI agents would be an excellent enhancement for Power Apps.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Hyland OnBase supports scalable growth for businesses, efficiently managing increased users and documents while maintaining performance and enterprise workflows.
Sentiment score
6.7
Microsoft Power Apps is scalable but faces concerns with enterprise scalability and costs, with varied user experiences.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Hyland OnBase offers modular pricing, seen as costly, with varied licensing options and potential regional pricing adjustments needed.
Sentiment score
6.3
Microsoft Power Apps offers flexible pricing, favoring existing Office 365 users, with potential costs for premium features and enterprise scalability.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Hyland OnBase is a stable, reliable, low-maintenance application, performing smoothly with correct hardware and adequate RAM setup.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Power Apps is stable and reliable for small to medium loads, with minor performance issues on large datasets.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.2
Hyland OnBase offers flexibility, security, integration, and comprehensive features with scalability and stability, supporting extensive content management.
Sentiment score
8.6
Microsoft Power Apps enhances integration, low-code development, and affordability, making app creation simple and efficient across devices.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)
Microsoft Power Apps
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
91
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 21.3%, down from 26.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Praveen Chaudhary - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates form creation and application planning but lacks performance
We have started exploring those parts. It is in the initial stages and capable of performing simple tasks that are helpful. We are still exploring how it can work with profiles, and other AI features that Microsoft continues to introduce. It provides a basic starting point within its capabilities. Microsoft Power Apps is a perfect tool. Understanding its limitations is crucial to identifying where it best fits within organizational solutions. It excels in scenarios requiring quick turnaround times, offering easy maintenance with minimal technical expertise needed. However, it's not suited for complex enterprise-level solutions. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
The solution costs around $5,000 per month. It is very relative.
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
The solution’s initial setup is a little complex. The look and feel need improvement as well.
How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
 

Also Known As

OnBase
PowerApps, MS PowerApps
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.