Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Power Apps vs Salesforce Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Power Apps
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
1st
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
90
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Salesforce Platform
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
8th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (7th), Mobile Development Platforms (3rd), No-Code Development Platforms (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 17.7%, down from 24.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salesforce Platform is 5.6%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Praveen Chaudhary - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2024
Facilitates form creation and application planning but lacks performance
We have started exploring those parts. It is in the initial stages and capable of performing simple tasks that are helpful. We are still exploring how it can work with profiles, and other AI features that Microsoft continues to introduce. It provides a basic starting point within its capabilities. Microsoft Power Apps is a perfect tool. Understanding its limitations is crucial to identifying where it best fits within organizational solutions. It excels in scenarios requiring quick turnaround times, offering easy maintenance with minimal technical expertise needed. However, it's not suited for complex enterprise-level solutions. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
ChrisTook - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 21, 2022
Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards
I don't have any huge love for it. I don't have any huge love for most of the tech solutions I use. Working in software sales could be better. The tasks, the reminders, and keeping myself on point, for example, in that sense, the forecasting could all be better. It could be maybe a bit more user-intuitive. I've been using the Lightning version for the last couple of years. There were a couple of features that were lost from Salesforce Classic to Lightning, though I recognize some of the improvements. Better UI and UX would be great. They should offer more help built into the platform itself. It would be really useful if, for example, in the reporting tab, I could have a little wizard or something which says, "Hey, this is your first time visiting the reports tab. Here are details and Youtube videos," et cetera.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"Power Apps facilitates form creation, application planning, and automation. We have encountered scenarios where automation was crucial, such as managing emails according to SOPs and handling basic ERP tasks like user password changes and role assignments"
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"It is very easy for us to implement. We have a Microsoft ecosystem, and this solution has many components for integration."
"Flexibility, easy setup, and fairly quick results are valuable features of the product."
"Microsoft Power Apps has helped us handle our fairly complex invoices, including filing and reviewing them manually. We’re working towards automating our invoice processing, labeling them according to organization accounts, and developing an entirely digital workflow. The tool uses customizable AI models for your organization's documents, so it supports AI-driven projects well."
"I can have a SharePoint list and connect with users through PowerApps to present the information."
"I would say that it's a very advanced product because it empowers people to do simple things, which previously may have required people to have some technical skills."
"The reporting capabilities are pretty user-friendly."
"The most valuable features are quick customization, solid deployment processes, and excellent reliability."
"The solution has plenty of features that are useful."
"Intuitive to work with and the overall fundamental of the platform is very strong."
"When compared to Siebel, the Salesforce Platform is easier to use."
"Salesforce's strongest feature is reporting especially. It's also a lot more usable than other platforms I've worked with. It has a great user experience, with the ability to filter and access information in real-time."
"There are no major performance issues in the solution."
"It is an easy product to use and does great things for our company. It keeps track of all of our sales activity."
 

Cons

"I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration."
"One area for improvement in the platform is enhancing the user experience, especially for less tech-savvy users, by simplifying complex features and controls."
"The availability of templates needs to be improved. I understand that the ecosystem around it is still developing, but we need more templates. I would like the entire ecosystem around it to improve. I would recommend adding AI components. Even though we can always connect to Azure for AI components, they should slowly start looking at adding some AI components to PowerApps so that out-of-the-box learning can be applied to process flows. Salesforce has the Einstein layer that works along with license platforms. PowerApps should also have something similar."
"I recommend improving Microsoft Power Apps' licensing model. I've encountered challenges related to licensing complexity, which has led some customers to opt for traditional solution development and deployment methods instead."
"A downside is that Power Apps is primarily designed to work within the Microsoft ecosystem. It’s unsuitable for publishing apps outside the network, so you need additional Microsoft technologies for broader use. While it’s very scalable for simple apps, it's not ideal for large-scale enterprise applications."
"It's sometimes hard to import groups of options. At this point, I need to enter those manually and it slows the process down."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"One area where the solution lacks is the limited size of the database it offers its users."
"The reporting needs improvement and the dashboard could have more components added."
"The marketing automation needs improvement."
"The pricing of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement since, right now, I am not sure if Salesforce Platform has any plans for start-ups or small businesses."
"A company needs to carefully consider how they set up Salesforce in order to ensure it benefits them."
"I think that Salesforce can improve lead management when it comes to B2C. I would like to have more features specifically related to the B2C segment. The current process where you create a lead that's in the B2C segment and it creates an account makes no sense."
"One area that could use improvement is the approval mechanism in the authenticator, which is unstable."
"Instead of creating our own template, if we had some nice templates that we could pick up - if there were some Microsoft Word templates or Microsoft Excel templates in a repository in Salesforce, that would be great."
"When we're documenting information such as notes, and so forth, if we were to go back to the same case all notes go missing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Power Apps is not an expensive solution."
"Pricing for this solution is completely based on user requirement. If your requirement is simple or less complex, then the basic licensing model can work, e.g. the free model, or else, you need to go for the premium features or premium model."
"Usually, the free licenses of Power Apps come to normal corporate users for free...For normal users within a corporate firm with licenses, it's totally favorable."
"If you start to use any premium connectors that are not stored in a SharePoint list or on an Excel workbook, then it costs $4 per user per month. If you want unlimited, it's about $16 per month for unlimited apps, and unlimited connectors."
"The cost for licensing could be lower."
"My company has non-profit licensing, and hence, it is affordable. Pricing depends on usage."
"One of the main things about this solution is the price. The cost for Salesforce is $35, $25, or $10 per user per month. PowerApps costs much less than that. It is at a good price point. It may change in the future, but at this point, its price is pretty fine."
"There are two licensing costs, one is pay-as-you-go, or you can develop it for one year."
"Salesforce does a user capacity analysis on a regular basis. For example, if you're not using certain areas, you may lose access. If you don't go in and quote and edit quotes, all of a sudden you may lose your rights to quote."
"I have heard that it is fairly priced. It offers ROI."
"It is expensive."
"It is expensive. Licensing is on an annual basis."
"The product's additional features can be expensive."
"It is very expensive. Its licensing is on a monthly basis."
"I haven't had to buy Salesforce, however, I have heard it's $1500 a user."
"It is a fair price for what it's offering, in comparison with other solutions that are available on the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
How does Salesforce Platform compare with Azure?
Microsoft’s Windows Azure platform is not easy or intuitive to deploy. The difficulty will be impacted by the type of application that you are trying to use the platform to build. Organizations tha...
Do you build applications using low-code or pro-code builders on Salesforce Platform?
At my organization, we have only used Salesforce Platform's low-code builder. The reason for this is not because we do not like the pro-code option, but because we do not see the need of using it, ...
Which edition of Salesforce Platform do you use, and it is worth the price?
I work at a big organization, and we pay for Platform Plus - the more expensive version of Salesforce Platform. We were using Platform Starter before, however, it became inefficient for our growin...
 

Also Known As

PowerApps, MS PowerApps
Salesforce1, Force.com, Salesforce App Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
ADP
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Power Apps vs. Salesforce Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.