We primarily use the solution for MDM and file protection.
Excellent for mail and Office365 aps on mobile devices and cloud services.
We primarily use the solution for MDM and file protection.
Excellent for mail and Office365 aps on mobile devices and cloud services.
The solution is very good at securing files. For example, if I forward a secure document, it's blocked from others, as I can send it with restrictions in relation to who can open it.
The MDM part of the engine could be better.
There should be more desktop support.
Overall, we're satisfied with the features that are available on the solution currently.
I've been using the solution for almost five years.
The solution is stable. We haven't had issues with bugs, glitches or crashes. We've been very satisfied with the stability overall.
I believe the solution is scalable. I don't think much about it since it just scales itself.
I'm not sure how many users are on the solution in my organization. I've done several installations. We have a staff ranging around 15,000 employees.
I've personally been in touch with technical support. I'm very satisfied with their level of support.
We previously used the Config Manager for client administration. It's not too similar to our current solution. This one is much more modern and quite dynamic.
The complexity of the initial setup depends on the planning. It can be straightforward, but it need to be planned appropriately.
We have a business relationship with Microsoft.
I'd recommend that product, however, planning is the most important thing an organization can do to prep for implementation. It's a good idea to get someone with experience and who understands your needs to assist you at the beginning.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
There is one application that was in-house, which was developed by one of the internal in-house application itself. That application, we have integrated and we get support from the vendor, from Microsoft. We have set up the application in our environment. This is what I have done for three or four months for one or two applications.
More information is available on the internet. I found it more geographical. It is user-friendly. Apart from that, there's a particular feature which I can tell you, that is what is user-friendly so I can do anything. We publish it.
Integration has been the most valuable. The tools helped us in a case in one of my organizations that there were two organizations that were going to unite. One organization was using one IDM tool and the other is using the different one. This became a little bit difficult to handle. It would be great if we could have the same application for both organizations. It would be great if we can integrate them somehow.
For Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security, I've not worked much with it and have only been exposed to it for three or four months where I have published one or two applications.
Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is stable.
The technical support is quite good. As of now, I am not faced with anything that was neglected or that is unsolvable. I always get a prompt response as well.
In my organization most of them will be migrating to Microsoft, leaving AirWatch and MobileIron.
The initial setup was very straightforward. It took one and a half months to deploy it. Two or three months configuring and teaching Service Desk and the level one people. In my organization most of them will be migrating to Microsoft, leaving the AirWatch and MobileIron. The number of users is around 15,000+ in one project.
We did the deployment with the help of Microsoft's consultants. But sometimes, we found it difficult to educate the application developers to integrate. But that was solvable because they also found the articles on the internet.
I would rate Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security at an eight out of ten.