SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Reviews

We mainly use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. 

We like that it is cloud-native security. It gives us an overview of all cloud structures. For example, if I'm integrating with AWS or Azure and I'm not sure of all of the instances, it will scan the whole cloud and show us issues related to instances. It can help us uncover vulnerabilities. 

Of all the features we use, the cloud configuration and the offensive security engine are the most used. There is a secret scanning feature that I really like. It scans the public repositories, private repositories, and developer repositories. That way, we can see if any secret is added to the search engine or anywhere over the Internet. It detects this and then lets us know to which repository it was added. We can get it removed if we need to from repositories like GitHub.

The solution is good for verifying actual exploit paths. It helps us detect whether all the instances that are publicly available can be made private. We can see if anything is suspicious or harmful to us in the future or if any technical exploit has a specific port or something like that. If there is any vulnerability, such as if our Microsoft version is publicly exposed or if it is an older version, we can disable it, or we can upgrade to get the latest version of iOS to avoid exploitation.

The solution is easy to use. The interface is nice. Anyone can spend a day or two with the solution and they'll be able to understand the whole structure of the application, its features, and how to use it. 

The integration with other solutions is very good. We integrate it with Jira and it runs smoothly. There are also default integrations for various clouds, like Google and Azure. We can also get alerts in various ways, like through Jira or email.

The evidence-based reporting is useful. It provides evidence according to the issue. We get a proper overview of the issue. I can check the evidence panel to see if the issue is genuine or a false positive by looking at the evidence. 

We noted immediate benefits from using the solution. Within about a month, we had it integrated with Jira, and connected to all accounts and were able to easily find issues. 

With SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, we are 96% to 97% compliant. It helps us judge and, as necessary, mitigate risks. 

We've noticed a drop in false positives. I haven't noticed any false positives in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, to be frank. Unless it's a glitch in the system, everything coming in is a positive.

Our mean time to detect has been reduced. 

It's helped us collaborate effectively between cloud security application developers and AppSec teams. Having a vulnerability management module gives good visibility to vulnerabilities that are highly exploitable. We can see exactly what's vulnerable or affected in order to troubleshoot.

We'd like the integration with Jira to be stronger in some areas. For example, we'd like to be able to create multiple tickets for multiple instances. Right now, we can only create one ticket and cannot be specific enough. There's no way to create multiple tickets. It's very difficult to assign multiple teams the same Jira ticket.

Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web.

I've used the solution for the last two years. 

The stability is good. There's no lagging or crashing. There may be a downtime once a quarter. 

We haven't had any issues with scaling. 

Technical support is very good. We do have a monthly call with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security whereby we run through and resolve any issues. They typically answer our queries within 24 hours. The team is good. They seem technical. 

This is the first cloud security tool we've used. 

The initial deployment was easy. The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team was very helpful. If we needed any help they were there to guide us. There's even a step-by-step guide. 

We had a member of the DevOps team provide us with all of the credentials and give permissions and another security team member to communicate to the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team in order to arrange all of the integrations. 

The tool is very efficient. There is no maintenance needed. 

We did not need any assistance from a reseller or consultant. 

While my understanding is there will be a price increase, so far, the pricing has been okay.

We evaluated Prisma Cloud and Crowd Strike. We used Crowd Strike for a while; however, now we are only using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is very good. It offers multiple modules, and no other tool provides vulnerability scanning, secret scanning, and container cloud security in one dashboard. 

We are a SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security customer. 

I'd rate the solution 9 out of 10. Overall, the tool is good. 

New users should be ready for a lot of issues that will come onto their dashboard. They'll need a team of three to four at the outset to analyze the dashboard and work through reported vulnerabilities. 

We have a wide array of applications. It extends beyond mere container and threat management; in fact, we extensively utilize it across all facets of our cloud data management. It offers comprehensive security for our entire infrastructure, encompassing containers, Kubernetes, cloud services, and more. Its scalability is particularly beneficial for our operations.

We receive Slack alerts for any vulnerable resources within our inventory. These alerts indicate if a particular resource is vulnerable and requires attention, ensuring timely action for remediation. Additionally, critical events are promptly communicated to us, enhancing our overall security posture.

Furthermore, we are provided with compliance metrics, allowing us to gauge our level of adherence to regulatory standards and guidelines.

Cloud Native Security's automation features have revolutionized our approach to cloud-native security, making it a standout solution in the market. With its seamless automation capabilities and timely alert notifications, Cloud Native Security ensures that we stay ahead of potential vulnerabilities, providing peace of mind in our dynamic cloud environment.

One of Cloud Native Security's greatest strengths lies in its ability to streamline compliance management. While specific controls are not directly provided, Cloud Native Security's automated assessment of our cloud and server infrastructure empowers us to maintain compliance effortlessly. The platform offers comprehensive insights into our compliance status, allowing us to identify areas for improvement and scale up our operations with confidence.

During our initial implementation, Cloud Native Security proved invaluable in tackling the challenges posed by our extensive resource inventory. By providing a detailed breakdown of resource utilization and associated vulnerabilities, Cloud Native Security enabled us to take proactive measures to enhance our security posture. The intuitive dashboard interface offers granular control and simplifies decision-making, sparing us the burden of manual inspections.

Cloud Native Security's automated auditing feature sets it apart, offering a comprehensive overview of our cloud resources with minimal effort. The asset inventory feature provides detailed insights into resource usage, ensuring that no stone is left unturned in our quest for security and compliance excellence. While there may be a slight learning curve initially, Cloud Native Security's user-friendly interface makes navigation a breeze over time.

The evidence-based reporting functionality of Cloud Native Security is a game-changer, allowing us to prioritize and address critical security issues efficiently. While occasional false positives may occur, Cloud Native Security's continuous improvement efforts ensure that such instances are minimal and swiftly addressed. Integration with our existing security infrastructure further enhances its capabilities, providing a holistic approach to our security strategy.

Overall, Cloud Native Security has been instrumental in fortifying our risk posture and facilitating our growth trajectory. With a significant reduction in mean time to detect issues and improved visibility for our development teams through DevSecOps integration, Cloud Native Security has truly become an indispensable asset in our security arsenal.

While we do encounter occasional false positives, we appreciate Cloud Native Security's efforts to address this issue.

In terms of improvement, we believe there's room for enhancing the comprehensiveness of their rule sets. Specifically, if we have unique requirements for our cloud security and need to establish custom rule sets, we require more comprehensive options than currently available. While Cloud Native Security has provided a feature for this purpose, its implementation is currently challenging. We see this as an area for improvement where Cloud Native Security could refine its offerings to better meet the diverse needs of its users.

I've been using the solution for 1.5 years. 

We have not found any glitches or suffered any downtime. 

Currently, we have approximately three platform engineers actively utilizing the solution.

The solution demonstrates excellent scalability and offers considerable flexibility.

Technical support is good. They help us out on certain details. We can submit tickets in order to get assistance. 

Positive

Previously, we didn't employ a different solution; instead, we relied on various open-source tools. While these tools weren't direct competitors, their functionalities didn't fully align with what we needed. Since adopting this solution, we've witnessed significant improvements in scaling our security measures effectively.

The initial onboarding process for Cloud Native Security resources presented some challenges, albeit manageable ones. However, the deployment itself was remarkably swift, typically taking only 15 to 20 minutes. Incorporating Cloud Native Security into our original deployment was crucial for establishing permissions effectively. To manage power demand efficiently, we required running scripts consistently.

As a Software as a Service (SaaS) solution, deployment to multiple locations wasn't necessary. Cloud Native Security is hosted on their cloud platform, eliminating concerns about maintenance or internal management on our end. We can rely on the provider for seamless operation without the need for internal intervention.

The pricing is fair, as it is determined by the resources we utilize. We have the flexibility to adjust our resource usage according to our needs.

Prior to implementing this solution, we didn't assess any other options.

Currently, the market offers numerous products for cloud-native security. Despite the abundance of choices, we received excellent guidance with this solution. The support provided was invaluable, demonstrating their strength in customer success.

As end users, we don't maintain a direct relationship with the company.

I highly recommend this solution to fellow users.

In terms of rating, I would give the solution a solid 9 out of 10.

Cloud Native Security is a CSPM platform we use for cloud security. It checks for vulnerabilities in our web applications and cloud configurations. It also detects infrastructure-as-code issues. Additionally, it scans to find secrets in our code before it goes live. 

Cloud Native Security identifies vulnerabilities before any bad actor can exploit them. We know if there's a misconfiguration in the cloud or vulnerabilities in our cloud-hosted applications. Kubernetes security is also a component. It also has multiple benchmarks for compliance with security regulations.

Since implementing Cloud Native Security, our risk posture has greatly improved. We are more compliant now. It has built-in compliance benchmarks for various regulatory standards. We were around 60 percent compliant when we started, and now we're at more than 95 percent. 

Cloud Native Security has reduced our mean detection time by continuously scanning and sorting issues into high, medium, and low priority. We can easily detect things before the wrong person finds them. The solution reduces our remediation time, but it varies depending on the team. We address critical issues immediately. Cloud Native Security's rescan capability is good because we can rescan in a few minutes to know whether the issue has been fixed. 

Cloud Native Security enables more collaboration between the security team and developers. The solution allows everyone to view the dashboard, so we can integrate more users and project teams. Everyone can look at the Cloud Native Security dashboard and see which issues are in their repositories or buckets. It's easier for everyone to work together to address issues. 

It saves a lot of time because we would need to look for secrets manually without Cloud Native Security. Searching for cloud misconfiguration issues is also time-consuming and hard to do correctly because our infrastructure is huge. It's inconvenient for the security team to check manually and do penetration testing of every component

When we initially integrated Cloud Native Security, we used to get some false positives, but it was manageable. Now, I rarely see any false positives because Cloud Native Security has improved its tool. We've given them a lot of feedback to help them differentiate between false positives and hits. It was a lot of manual work, but that has gotten better. 

Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in Cloud Native Security is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features. Recently, they added evidence-based reporting abilities. It tells us exactly where the issue is and gives us links to the endpoint and screenshots.

It allows us to scan for vulnerabilities and rate limits without deploying agents. Cloud Native Security allows us to set those values according to our server capabilities and preferences. We can also decide how many cluster images to scan.

The infrastructure-as-code feature is helpful for discovering open ports in some of the modules. It will tell us precisely where the port is open, including the repository and source code. Thus, we know that a port is open on that particular line. After integrating Cloud Native Security into our organization's system, we identified many thousands of secrets that are pushed into the source code.

We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization. 

The offensive security engine is pretty good, but I can't say it's complete. I rate it seven out of ten. Cloud Native Security's specialty is cloud security, so the offensive security does lack a few things. We cannot rip reports like Tenable, Qualys, and all those vulnerability scanners, but it identifies some sensitive issues like exposed APIs. Some other issues are not identified, like access, but it does detect sensitive information exposure. 

We have used Cloud Native Security for two or three years. 

I haven't had any issues with Cloud Native Security's stability. However, we once saw a spike in CPU consumption when they implemented a new feature.  We contacted Cloud Native Security, and they addressed it in a day. 

Cloud Native Security is highly scalable. 

I rate Cloud Native Security support nine out of ten. Their tech support is excellent. We have a dedicated person that we can contact directly. They recently introduced a new tool where we can chat with support directly from within the tool. 

Positive

Cloud Native Security is a SaaS solution, and the onboarding is straightforward. They have a good knowledge base, and it's easy to integrate it. You can get it up and running in under a day or two.

Cloud Native Security does offer ROI. We have used Cloud Native Security for more than three years, and we are stoked about the value the solution offers to our organization. 

Cloud Native Security doesn't cost much, so it's worth what you're paying, and the ROI is excellent. 

I rate Cloud Native Security nine out of ten. I would recommend it because many of the solutions that provide capabilities like secret scanning, cloud configurations, and offensive security charge by module, and the costs are pretty high. Cloud Native Security is more cost-effective, so I would recommend it. Also, the amount of issues Cloud Native Security detects is good.

We are using it for endpoint detection on all of our EC2 instances and hosts in the cloud. Along with it, we are also going to be using it for AV.

We do not have any EDR protection on our host. We would like to utilize it for AV to put some protection on our host. The pricing for the tool that we are using for AV has gone up, and they are not giving us a lot of things we need. Also, to use their EDR tool, we have to install a secondary agent, whereas, with SentinelOne, everything is included in the same agent.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security helps with forensics and extra protection on our host. We have not had any incidents where we had to fully use it or fully go into action with it, but we are hoping that it will provide the extra protection that we need to help resolve some blind spots that we have specifically on our hosts.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security has forensic visibility or deep visibility into the Linux kernel, but we have not used it. It is something that we will work on and use with our SOC team and the implementation team if an incident were to ever happen.

The historical data record provided by Singularity Cloud Workload Security after an attack will be useful if an incident happens. It will help us build a timeline of historical reference. It is easy to have it all in one place to build a timeline. We can see from start to finish where the incident started and where it occurred versus having to go in and do things manually by sifting through logs. The fact that SentinelOne is able to have that information or data and a single pane of glass is something that we like about the tool.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security helps to cut down the mean time to detect by having the historical reference and by being able to stop the incident with the hit of a switch. We can see from where it started, which is helpful. When you are an organization managing hundreds of accounts, it is hard to sieve through logs and get that information together, which increases our mean time to detect, whereas with SentinelOne, from the things we have seen and tested out, it seems simple and easy, and we are hoping that it will help us cut down on that time.

We are also hoping that it will reduce our mean time to remediate. We have not come across any actual incident to be able to fully know, but based on what we have seen so far in the tool, it seems it would.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security has not necessarily freed up staff to work on other projects, but it does reduce some time. It helps cut down on things. It does provide an easier capability. We have come from the old-school way of looking at logs. It seems that this tool will provide something much sleeker and easier for our SOC team to use.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security has not yet had much effect on our productivity. We have only had it for two months, but we like what we are seeing. We like implementing it. We like that it has a single agent and we can use it as AV. It seems to make things easy. It seems to be a more productive tool for us, but until we have an incident, I would not be able to say for sure. As of now, it looks like it has the capability.

Its interoperability with third-party solutions, such as Kubernetes, seems top-notch. We have integrated it with a couple of our solutions here, such as Kubernetes and containers, and we have not had any incidents or any problems to follow up or dig deep into. So far, the ability to look at our containers and to see into those clusters is something that puts Singularity above all others. With CrowdStrike or Trend Micro, we were not able to do that. We were not able to have the same visibility. SentinelOne Singularity made that easier for us.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security supports our ability to innovate from a standpoint where we know that our application teams and developers will be protected. When new applications are created, we will have some sense of security and some sense of safeguard for our teams. We did not have the visibility and the tools to protect us in the manner we would like, but with Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it looks like we can just put it on our endpoints and tell the teams to go and do as they wish because we know at least on this end, they will be protected.

From our tests and the things that we have done, we find Singularity Cloud Workload Security’s real-time threat detection and response capabilities attractive. We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek. Those are the things that are attractive to us.

We like the automated remediation feature. It is not something that we are going to use for automated remediation, but we do like the fact that it is there and can be utilized.

If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have.

We have been using it for two or three months. We went through a test trial, and we are finalizing the official purchase request to purchase it and start using it fully.

We have not experienced any issues so far.

We have not interacted with their support. We have only contacted our customer manager and our onboarding specialist. We have not had to submit any tickets.

We have not used any other similar solution previously.

It is a cloud deployment. I was involved in its initial setup. Its deployment was straightforward. There were a couple of questions that we had. Some of the documentation was not written in the best way. There were some hurdles when moving to the tool and understanding it, but for the most part, it was straightforward. We got all the instructions on how to deploy or install it. We were presented with a customer service rep who was an onboarding specialist. This customer service rep specialized in deployment for us, so everything was a simple setup.

We mainly did it ourselves, but we also had an integrator consultant from SentinelOne who was on the site. They answered all of our questions for anything that came up. For anything we needed, they were there to help us. We had three individuals full-time, and then we had a contractor.

In terms of maintenance, there is nothing required from the SentinelOne side. Once we onboard a lot of our hosts, we just need to organize it in a way that is easy for us, but from the SentinelOne or Singularity folks, nothing is required.

The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost.

We did evaluate other options. We tried Trend Micro Vision One. We also looked at CrowdStrike.

We went for Singularity Cloud Workload Security because it was built and made for the cloud. That was a big thing. The second big thing was that they utilize all of these different features with one agent.

The CrowdStrike solution is not built for the cloud. They have a cloud add-on, so it did not translate for us. The Trend Micro solution is somewhat built for the cloud. It is more of an on-prem tool that is moved to the cloud, but we have to utilize at least two agents to get all of the coverage, meaning AV and endpoint detection. With Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it is all covered in one agent. There is no need to put multiple agents on our host and go through that with our customers. It also allows us to place that agent using AWS Systems Manager, so the implementation in the cloud and launching of the agent is intuitive and easy. It was a no-brainer once we started looking at the tools in terms of how to implement them and what we would like in our organization. Singularity Cloud Workload Security took the top place.

It has a single agent to cover all aspects. You can save money and costs with data ingestion by using the Security DataLake from Singularity. There is also the ease of use of its console. There is also the ease of deployment by it being cloud-based. If you are looking for a tool that is perfect for cloud solutions and protects your cloud host, Singularity Cloud Workload Security would be at the top of my list.

To someone who does not think that they need a Singularity Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) because they have a continuous security monitoring (CSM) solution in place, I would recommend looking again at Singularity because there is one agent and the ease of transitioning and deploying into the cloud. Another big thing about Singularity is the holding of the data. We utilize Splunk. However, with Singularity, we do not need to ingest all the data because we can also utilize their data lake. The query or the information that we can look up at Splunk can also be looked up in Singularity, so there is no need to take all that data from Singularity and ingest it into our Splunk and increase our license. We can utilize our license and capabilities. We can just use the data lake that comes with Singularity and utilize logs in that manner. In the end, it is saving us costs when it comes to our SIEM tool ingestion, so I would recommend looking at these top aspects. It is easy in the cloud. It helps save data on your SIEM tool. It saves the ingestion costs. There is also a single agent.

I would rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security a nine out of ten.

We have deployed SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Workload Security to our servers and clients. 

Singularity's real-time detection and response capabilities so far have been great.

I like the way we have options in how we set up the automated remediation. We can set it up to automatically take action, or we can set it up to just flag or let us know that there is something that needs to be investigated. It has been really good in that regard. There are many, many options in how we can configure it, and I have liked that quite a lot.

Compared to my previous solution, I am more comfortable with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Workload Security. I was always concerned that the previous solution was not catching everything. There were a lot of false positives, and there were several cases where it did not catch everything. Even when it did catch something, the logging and forensic details were very limited. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Workload Security is the opposite of that. It gives us deep visibility into what is going on and what has happened. The mediation is great, and the logging is much more detailed. It has been a huge improvement over what I was using before. Singularity Cloud Workload Security has given me peace of mind.

To date, all threats detected were false positives or test threats. No actual threats have been encountered, but test threats were detected quickly.

One thing I particularly like about Singularity Cloud Workload Security is that it supports older legacy operating systems that we have been unable to eliminate. This is a valuable feature that other clients do not offer.

The visibility is the best part of the solution. To see exactly what's going on in all the clients, and processes that are running, I have got a few false positives, but those are relatively easy to investigate and remedy, and flag them as false positives.

We use Singularity Cloud Workload Security with Citrix and a non-persistent VDI. It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear. We eventually got it sorted out with the help of support, and I give credit to SentinelOne for that.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Workload Security for ten months.

I have not experienced any stability issues, client issues, or rogue agents causing problems. I have also not had any crashes. Overall, it has been great.

We have a relatively small environment, with fewer than a hundred endpoints deployed. So, scalability is easy for us. I don't know how it would work with thousands or even tens of thousands of clients, but I haven't had any issues so far.

The technical support is helpful.

Positive

Our previous solution, Trend Micro Worry-Free, in comparison, is quite poor. It did not give me very good visibility into what was happening with my clients, on the network, or what processes were running. If something happened, I was very limited in my ability to figure out what happened. In other words, the forensic capabilities of my previous solution were lacking.

There is no way to compare the turnaround time of obtaining telemetry data between the two solutions because Trend Micro Worry-Free did not provide any telemetry data. We would receive an email about a possible virus, but when we logged into the system to view the logs, there would be nothing there. Or, it would tell us that there was a virus, but it would not tell us which client was infected until we logged into the console. It was lacking in so many areas.

During the deployment, we conducted a test case. One of SentinelOne's sales engineers assisted us in setting up the software, configuring everything, and setting up notifications. They walked us through the process of setting everything up to my liking and how they would recommend setting up the software. They were instrumental in helping us deploy the system, and all of their assistance was included in the price of the system. We did not have to pay any additional fees. I found their assistance to be very helpful.

Without SentinelOne's help, the initial setup would likely be very complex. There are many options for configuring the product, which can be both beneficial and detrimental. On the one hand, it is beneficial if we are familiar with the software and know how to best configure it. This flexibility is a great advantage. On the other hand, if we are coming from a different product and do not know SentinelOne's software, it would be very helpful to have their assistance in walking us through the setup process and recommending a configuration.

I was the only person from our organization involved in the deployment.

I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought.

I also evaluated Carbon Black. I read a lot of reviews, both official and user-generated, to learn what people were saying about the product. What really drew me to SentinelOne was its legacy software support. This was a key factor for me, and it helped me eliminate some of the other options.

I would rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security eight out of ten.

The software itself is very good. Singularity Cloud Workload Security provides deep visibility and support. I have found the support team to be very responsive and helpful whenever I have engaged with them.

One of our requirements was that the solution was simple enough for me to maintain myself without spending a lot of time managing the software. There are software agent packages that become available, and I need to go in and approve them and push them out. There are occasional false positives, but overall, it's not a lot of work.

For straightforward clients on a PC or laptop, Singularity Cloud Workload Security works well. However, in edge-case scenarios like ours with Citrix and non-persistent VDI, we need to test it out to see if it works well enough in our environment. We had some initial problems getting it started, but we were able to resolve them. So, my advice is that if the scenario is straightforward, there should be no problems.

I use it to monitor and update my clients. We have about seventy users, which we run the client on, and we pretty much just monitor the activities and update the agents when possible. We use it to make sure that there are no viruses or malware on the user end, the endpoint machines. It's an antivirus.

We were looking for a solution that wasn't hard to manage and wasn't intrusive on the client end. We needed something users couldn't make changes to or take up too much CPU. We wanted to make sure that when we loaded this on the user machine it wasn't going to tax it. 

The ease of use is great.

The portal is great. It's not complicated. I can find what I need and it's straightforward. It's not over complicated. 

The real time detection and response capabilities are good. I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on. 

They have an automated remediation feature that I have used. You can resolve issues on the portal. 

The forensic visibility into the Linux kernel is very good. It helps to catch things early on. They've been able to remediate situations pretty quickly.

The historical record after the attacks is informative. It gives me the information I need. It's done really well.

The solution has helped me free up time. I go maybe once a week to see a status and if I get any alerts via email, I'll action something. My users are pretty educated and I haven't had to really worry too much. There's barely anything getting caught as the staff is all very diligent.

When it catches something, we're able to quickly get a handle on it. It's doing its job and we haven't had to worry about any attacks.

There isn't anything I don't like. It's really easy to use, for example. 

Their search feature could be better. When I go in and try to search for stuff, it could be a bit easier. It can be a little cumbersome. 

I've been using the solution for two years. We're going to be renewing our contract soon. 

I've had no stability issues at all.  

It's easy to scale. Scaling is straightforward.

We're a non-profit, so we won't grow too much. We don't really have use for the auto scaling feature. However, the feature does make scaling easy for those who need to grow.

I've barely contacted technical support. I've only spoken to sales in regard to demos. I had to call support once when an agent didn't install correctly. I had them get a cleaner to remove it from the machine. That only happened once. They were very helpful and it was easy to contact them. I was done in ten minutes. 

Positive

I did previously use McAfee. When we had to renew, we were looking for something simple on the client end and pretty light. McAfee tends to tax the machine a bit. It had a clunky client as well. The reputation of Sentinel was also better than McAfee's. 

I was involved with the initial deployment. The setup was straightforward. I had no issues with the setup.

Outside of occasionally upgrading the agents, there is no maintenance needed. 

I handled the setup myself and my boss. 

The pricing and licensing are competitive. 

We were evaluating McAfee and Symantec and a few other companies. I can't recall the others. Sentinel just stood out. 

To those who have a continuous monitoring solution in place, I'd advise them to have something running on their client end as well. Otherwise, you don't have full coverage. 

I haven't really integrated the solution with any third-party solutions.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. It's straightforward and not that hard to work with. You don't have to do too much prep work before jumping in. It's an easy solution to implement. 

We have one client, and we need a portal to manage security. We use Singularity to provide security information and identify vulnerabilities or malicious scripts that need to be fixed. It also provides recommendations about each of the vulnerabilities that are helpful.

We provide cloud services on our site using AWS. Singularity detects flaws that we must close for security reasons. We use Singularity to observe those findings and fix things based on the customer's requirements. Previously, we used to segregate issues and look after them. Singularity helped us secure our infrastructure. We've significantly reduced our potential security breaches to a minimum. 

It has improved how we operate on a larger scale. We set up the platform, onboarded the info, and then gradually moved further. Over time, it helped us slowly resolve those issues. We were using the cloud platforms' native security tools, but those were unhelpful. Now, we rely on this more than those services. 

Singularity reduced our false positive rate by about 60 percent. We've had even better results in terms of our risk posture. We can rely on this tool to improve our security conditions on a broader scale. If I gave our security posture a percent rating, I would give it 89 percent.

The solution saves time by giving us everything in one place. You don't need to manually check every account. It tells us a lot. Singularity reduces our detection time by about 60 percent. 

Singularity has improved collaboration among cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. Previously, it would take around a week for engineers to address issues. Now that we use this tool, we resolve issues in one or two days.

We're monitoring several cloud accounts with Singularity. It is convenient to identify issues or security failures in any account. It's nice to have all the details we need to solve these issues. Singularity is easy and convenient to use. It is extremely easy for a novice to understand what the dashboard is trying to say and the terminology's meanings.

Evidence-based reporting is excellent for auditing. It shows all the findings and severity: low, high, medium, or critical. We solve the low-level and medium issues. Next, we resolve high-level and critical problems. It's easy to fix the security breaches.

We repeatedly get alerts on the tool dashboard that we've already solved on our end, but they still appear. That is somewhat irritating. 

We have used Singularity Cloud Security for about six months.

I rate Singularity nine out of 10 for stability. 

I rate Singularity eight out of 10 for scalability. 

I rate SentinelOne support nine out of 10. 

Positive

Singularity took about a week to deploy. A team of 40 to 50 people was involved. 

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security nine out of 10. I would recommend the tool to others. It's a convenient and cost-effective tool for identifying security breaches. You get everything in one place, saving you time and costs.

Our infrastructure is on AWS and we integrate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security with our enterprise accounts to identify misconfiguration on the Cloud.

The offensive security engine helps us visualize any potential attacks.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps us maintain and improve our security posture.

It has helped reduce the number of false positives.

We have improved our mean time to detection with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our mean time to remediation. The alerts provided included details that help us address the issues quickly.

The most valuable aspects of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are its alerting system and the remediation guidance it provides. This combination helps us identify misconfigurations and vulnerabilities in our systems and swiftly address them.

In addition to the console alerts, I would like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to also send email notifications.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for one and a half years.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is stable.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is scalable.

The technical support is helpful and responds quickly to our requests.

Positive

We previously used AWS Security but switched to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security because of its wider scanning range and centralized console for maintenance.

The initial deployment was straightforward and took one month to complete.

We completed the implementation in-house with the help of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security eight out of ten.

I recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to others.

We use the solution for security purposes. We deploy it into our infrastructure in the cloud. We want to make sure that all everything is secure, for example,if APIs are getting accessed, that it's by the right people. It's a security hub for us.

The solution is very good at tracing issues. 

The dashboard is quite helpful. It's easy to use. The product is flexible and can be used in multi-cloud setups.

It's an easy solution for a beginner. 

We've taken advantage of the reporting, which is quite good. It provides us with all the information we need. They have proof of exploitability capabilities, which is important to use. 

The solution has agentless vulnerability scanning, which we use. You can look at extra ports. It's a great feature. 

Its infrastructure of code scanning is useful. I can see it in the container configuration file. It's good for identifying preproduction issues in the container configuration files. It's working well. However, it's not dynamic. It's static.

We were able to witness the benefits after some time had passed. Within a month or two had passed, we began to really witness change. Previously, we were running blind, and now we can see where things might go wrong. 

Our risk posture has improved. Both time to detect and time to remediate have improved.

It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. 

They could have more comprehensive reporting. I'd like to see more details. 

We've found a lot of false positives. It has not helped us reduce our level of false positives. 

We'd like them to work on integration between networks. If I deployed the solution with another layer of security, they can't talk to each other. PinGSafe basically needs to integrate with more tools, especially on the security side. 

I've used the solution for 1.5-2 years. 

The stability is good. I haven't noticed any lagging or crashing. 

The solution can scale fast. The dependency is on the API side, however. 

I've contacted technical support in the past. The quality is good. However, sometimes their staff don't know the details. The speed of response is good.

Positive

I have used other solutions, including Prisma and Datadog. 

I was involved in the initial deployment of PingSafe. It was very easy to implement. We had two to three people working on the set up process. 

There is no maintenance needed for the solution once it is up and running. 

I'm a PingSafe customer. 

I'd rate the solution 8 out of 10. If someone is looking for a CPSM tool, they should look into PingSafe's capabilities to see if they match what a company needs. 

We use the solution for monitoring the security of our infrastructure. It helps us identify all the vulnerabilities.

We had code and infrastructure, and we just weren't sure of all the vulnerabilities within them. This knowledge has helped protect us from security loopholes. 

It's integrated with all of our cloud services on our accounts. It automatically fetches all the resources, scans through the code, and reports back on our vulnerabilities. It helps with all of our overall security standards as per the industry, and it can give us a rating. If I go to the compliance section, it gives me an idea of how I'm performing with respect to compliance metrics.

There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring.

It's fairly easy to use. I'd rate the ease of use 7 out of 10. There is a learning curve around the initial issues. However, we can look at issue descriptions and what to do. It gives us a lot of details about an issue, so that helps. 

Evidence-based reporting helps prioritize and solve our cloud security issues.

PingSafe includes proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting. It's really important. If we did have any proof, it would be harder to pinpoint false positives. I like that it gives proof.

The code scanning is helpful. Whenever somebody commits a recent code, it helps identify that immediately and check vulnerabilities. 

It has positively affected our exposure. Before we implemented it, we were having lots of issues, and now, with PingSafe, we're up to 87% compliance with respect to all security metrics. It's been a gradual process, however, we're getting better and better. 

We've been able to reduce mean time to detect. It's gotten a bit faster. If you have a solution like this, you can take a more proactive approach. When a vulnerability happens, you can act immediately. Our mean time to detect has improved by about 80%.

It's also helped us with our mean time to remediate. It shows recommended actions and helps tell us what could possibly remediate the issue. 

The product has positively affected collaboration among our cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. PingSafe, however, is more centered around our infrastructure security and doesn't impact developer productivity much.

The compliance monitoring capabilities are helpful. We're a venture product, so we need to be compliant with everything. When we get a report, we can see what we need to do for compliance, and it helps us identify issues and mitigate them effectively to increase compliance. 

There is a bit of a learning curve for new users. The ease of use could be better.

We've had an issue where we muted a false positive, however, when we made some changes to a cloud configuration, it popped up again. So it hasn't really reduced false positives; you just need to manually ignore them. 

I've used the solution for one year. 

The solution has been stable throughout. 

We have three to four users that are actively using PingSafe. They are admins and engineers. 

So far, we haven't had any scalability issues. 

They have great technical support.

Positive

We didn't use a different solution previously.

The initial deployment was pretty quick. When you integrate any of your cloud service providers, it doesn't take long. We had it implemented in a few days. One of our reps can just work with the team to get it ready.

It's not integrated with any other security tools, however, it is integrated within our infrastructure. 

No maintenance is required.

I don't have any visibility on the pricing of PingSafe. 

We have not evaluated other solutions. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I'd rate the product 8 out of 10.