Skyhigh Security Reviews

• Skyhigh's Shadow IT capability
• Cloud Risk Registry
• DLP policies and anomalies

We are able to see what cloud services are being used with more clarity than with our proxies. More importantly, we can identify that we are using many cloud services in which we were not aware that they were even cloud services, especially collaboration services. The cloud risk registry has been great for getting a quicker and clearer understanding of the risk of proposed services that we are looking at allowing. Previously, we were paying for expensive industry reports.

Finally, anomalies are key players to identify the intruders in an organization.

1. The Skyhigh for Google Drive interface and policy engine is a bit confusing and limited when compared against other Google Drive CASB capabilities.
2. The de-tokenization process
3. Data anomalies

More than two years.

Yeah, a little bit.

Sometimes.

No.

Excellent.

Excellent.

No, we haven't

The vendor team was excellent.

Good.

Not applicable.

Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.

Netskope.

Needs stability and additional new features.

We primarily use the solution for security purposes. McAfee in general is very good for that.

The solution is stable. The performance has been great.

It's an easy-to-use product. We find it to be quite user-friendly.

The scalability of the product is excellent. 

Overall, we have been very happy with the product. It's been working well.

The installation was straightforward and pretty simple. 

The pricing of the solution could be adjusted to make it more reasonable. 

I"ve been using the solution only for a couple of months at this point. It hasn't been a long period of time just yet. It's still new to me.

The product is quite stable and we have found the performance to be good. It doesn't crash or freeze. there are no bugs or glitches. We are happy with its capabilities.

The solution can scale if you need it to. A company shouldn't have any issues expanding it.

We have one or two customers that use it at this time.

We've been satisfied with technical support overall. They have been helpful and responsive. We have no complaints in terms of their overall capabilities.

The initial setup was not overly complex or difficult. It was straightforward. We found it simple. A company shouldn't face any issues with the implementation.

The solution could improve the cost a bit.

You do need to have a license in order to use the solution. I cannot speak to the exact costs.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten overall. We are pretty happy with its capabilities and have no complaints. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. 

• Prevents unauthorized data being shared from external sources.
• Enforces data loss prevention.
• DLP reporting and deep integration.

• Malware and spam mails
• Attacks from hackers
• Data privacy

Detecting threats.

One year.

No.

No.

No.

A 10 out of 10.

A 10 out of 10.

No.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We implemented in-house.

Our ROI is 150%.

The pricing is reasonable.

No.

Tokenization.

High-risk services.

De-tokenization.

One year.

No.

No.

No.

A 10 out of 10.

An eight out of 10.

No.

We implemented in-house.

Skyhigh Box

It makes our work easier.

Cloud computing.

Almost a year.

No.

No.

No.

It is a nine out of 10.

It is a nine out of 10.

No.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Implemented in-house.

It is confidential.

It is very easy.

No.

Sanctioned IT.

To analyse cloud traffic.

Reports.

One year.

No.

No.

No.

An eight out of 10.

A seven out of 10.

No.

Implemented through a vendor team. Their expertise was advanced.

Positive.

Go with the licensing.

Nope.

• Shadow IT
• Sanctioned IT

High-risk services

De-tokenization.

One year.

Yes.

No.

Yes.

A six out of 10.

A six out of 10.

No.