Its management is good, and it is also scalable and mostly stable.
Manager at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Scalable, mostly stable, and good management
Pros and Cons
- "Its management is good, and it is also scalable and mostly stable."
- "Its decryption time needs to be improved. Currently, its decryption time is very long, and it takes double time than encryption. They need to work on that. Its encryption time is fine."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
Its decryption time needs to be improved. Currently, its decryption time is very long, and it takes double time than encryption. They need to work on that. Its encryption time is fine.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for four to five years. I am using its latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There are minor challenges related to the updates for Windows and Mac systems, but it is mostly stable.
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Endpoint Encryption. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I didn't contact their technical support.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution. I would rate Symantec Endpoint Encryption an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Operations Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The stability and scalability are good
Pros and Cons
- "We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."
- "We would like some advanced security protection features."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case is for protecting accounts.
What is most valuable?
Protecting accounts.
What needs improvement?
We would like some advanced security protection features.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been good, so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is good.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial support was straightforward.
What was our ROI?
The solution has helped to increase staff productivity.
What other advice do I have?
It is a good product.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Endpoint Encryption. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Assistant System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Enables us to easily get updates and other encrypted files
Pros and Cons
- "You get updates and other encrypted files easily."
- "More features need to be included in the encryption software."
What is our primary use case?
We are currently working with companies in the financial sector which is why we are using this on-premises solution, because their compliance policies do not allow for cloud-based servers. Our clients are using the full encryptions. They're using Symantec Endpoint Encryption to secure their data. If someone loses their laptop, for example, they can wipe their disk and save their data from ending up with a third party.
What is most valuable?
I like all the features in Symantec Endpoint because they provide four or five features for end-users. They have three consoles for managing the data. Symantec also provides the licensing with the software. There is no need to enter the licensing or install files manually because it's bundled with the software. This is a good feature. Also, you get updates and other encrypted files easily. I also like the manage keys.
There is no need to add any features, because they are developing their own encryption methods.
What needs improvement?
Currently, all the software has been managed by BitLocker, but Windows does not suit every encryption management software.
There are many apps that do that kind of thing. All the features are there so I don't think that needs to be on encryption software. I'm working with some end point management software and they are managing the software and connections, what can be installed and what is restricted, etc... But more features need to be included in the encryption software.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Symantec Endpoint Encryption for one year.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Their scalability is good. They are using three consoles and have full-consoling end point users for our solutions.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale of one to ten I would rate Symantec Endpoint an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Architect at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Quick comparison of disk performance before and after full disk encryption
The following measurements were taken with a Lenovo Thinkpad W500 with 8Gb ram & running Windows 7 SP1+fixes. The CPU is a 2.5 Ghz core duo.
Whilst not intending to do a thorough controlled test, I thought it would be interesting to see what the effect of Symantec PGP encryption might be on I/O performance
Here’s my SSD before encryption
And here’s the same afterwards
Write speed has roughly been quartered whilst read speed is a little over half
Given this is an SSD the overall throughput is still decent, though this came with a significant increase in CPU – in fact this is now the limiting factor it seems, with the “System” (ie kernel) showing maxed out CPU whilst previously this CPU wasn’t noticeably high
With the hard drive the before measurements were :
Pretty consistent and average for a hard drive. Now adding encryption
Nowhere near such a bad effect – less consistency, but due to the lower data rates the cpu load was lower, and not so close to being maxed out.
This was all done on an idle machine – so the biggest impact will be heavy UI when the system is busy. I expect bootup to be quite a bit slower for this reason
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Endpoint EncryptionPopular Comparisons
Microsoft BitLocker
Digital Guardian
ESET Endpoint Encryption
McAfee Complete Data Protection
Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption
Voltage SecureData Enterprise
Sophos SafeGuard
Oracle Advanced Security
WinMagic SecureDoc
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade
ZENworks Suite
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What are the main pros and cons of the various Endpoint Encryption solutions on the market?
- How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
- Which encryption solution is better: ESET Endpoint Encryption or Symantec Endpoint Encryption?
- Which full disk encryption software should we chose?
- What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?
- What is the best email encryption software for small enterprises using Office 365?
- When evaluating Endpoint Encryption, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What should one take into account when replacing PGP with Microsoft BitLocker?
- Why do organizations need endpoint encryption?
- What are the main pros and cons of the various Endpoint Encryption solutions on the market?