Digital Guardian vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Fortra and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Fortra is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5. Fortra holds a 0.7% mindshare in EE, compared to Broadcom’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Digital Guardian

Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews

149 Views
106 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Read 36 Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

1,522 Views
1,073 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Digital Guardian are competitors in the security software market. Symantec is often highlighted for its superior scalability and strong encryption capabilities, while Digital Guardian is preferred for its advanced data loss prevention and classification abilities.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers seamless endpoint integration, stability, and antivirus protection, valuable for enterprise solutions. Digital Guardian stands out with its forensic analysis, adaptive inspection, and robust endpoint detection, crucial for protecting personal identifying information.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users seek better integration with other products, enhanced technical support, and simpler upgrades. Digital Guardian users report needing improvements in Linux agent performance, cloud integration, and easier deployment procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec is available as on-premises and hybrid, with users noting complex deployment and varied support experiences. Digital Guardian offers on-premises and cloud solutions, but setup complexity and slower support response times are reported.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is known for its higher cost, aligning with its enterprise-level scaling and robust security features. Digital Guardian's pricing is perceived to range mid to high, offering subscription or perpetual licenses with noted professional services costs. Both products are recognized for enhancing staff productivity and data protection, highlighting their investment value.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

9th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (11th), Mobile Data Protection (7th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (41st)

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is 9.5%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Encryption

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

Bharath Kumar Gajula

Network Security Architect at Capgemini

Robust data protection with user-friendly deployment, competitive pricing, and comprehensive features like customizable alerts and effective detection capabilities but needs GUI improvements

The stability is relatively good. Occasionally, certain clients may experience disconnection from the management servers, requiring a manual process to rectify. Even in instances where the link is severed, restoring client connectivity can be challenging, sometimes necessitating the uninstallation and reinstallation of the software. Additionally, when clients go out of sync, we do not receive alerts, indicating an area for potential improvement. I would rate it seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is really terrific."

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."

"It has been scalable."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."

More Digital Guardian pros

"Overall Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a reasonable solution."

"It is fairly stable."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The solution was used to find harmful files and viruses on laptops."

"This product is a solid, all-in-one solution for enterprise data management."

"We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities."

"The solution is easy to use."

"In general terms, it is working properly and according to our expectations. The comfort of feeling secure is the most valuable. Some customers had certain fears about changing the product because no one wants to lose any kind of information or to have some problems or inconsistencies while migrating from one product to another."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pros

Cons

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"Technical support could be better."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

More Digital Guardian cons

"It's a bit difficult to get good support. Their response times are really bad."

"The UI could be improved."

"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."

"There are some issues with the single sign-on with the active directory. We had a few problems related to the synchronization between the active directory and the login features of the Symantec products because the users made many password changes during the day. The time for synchronization with the solutions can be improved. I would like to see mobile encryption. There should be a possibility to include all the mobiles of a company in the console. Many customers are asking about encryptions for tablets or cell phones, but we don't have any product that we are comfortable with to recommend to our customers."

"The solution presently doesn't let network folder encryption be done on Macintosh."

"Its decryption time needs to be improved. Currently, its decryption time is very long, and it takes double time than encryption. They need to work on that. Its encryption time is fine."

"I would like them to have integration with a wider range of non-Symantec products."

"I would like to see some features or functionality enhanced in Symantec Endpoint Encryption."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."

"They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options."

"Although the performance and stability of this solution are good, our challenge is the price tag. You buy the solution once, but you also have to keep on buying the licenses yearly."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."

"The pricing is fair but there is variability in our area that needs to be addressed."

"We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

See all answers

How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protecti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not sure about the pricing and licensing cost of Symantec Endpoint Encryption.

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 74% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 7% of the time

Stormshield Data Security vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 6% of the time

ZENworks Suite vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

April 2025

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

March 2025

Download Symantec Endpoint Encryption product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec Drive Encryption

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

April 2025

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.