Top 10 Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: HP

Top Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service), Horizon Cloud Service, and Amazon Appstream. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] surpasses its competitors by delivering ultra-secure, highly reliable remote access with hardware-based security, minimized latency, and exceptional display performance that ensures seamless user experiences without the need for an operating system.

HP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with HP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

4.2 out of 5

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

4.2 out of 5

Citrix DaaS offers a comprehensive cloud-based approach with adaptability and scalability, ideal for those seeking lower initial costs and flexible deployments. In comparison, Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients provide high-performance endpoints for graphics-heavy tasks, appealing to those valuing hardware optimization despite upfront investments.

Pricing

Citrix DaaS offers a flexible setup cost structure, while Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients, now discontinued, had a fixed setup fee. The differences in setup costs highlight Citrix DaaS's adaptability in pricing versus Teradici's rigid approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Horizon Cloud Service

4.1 out of 5

Horizon Cloud Service

4.1 out of 5

Horizon Cloud Service offers scalable cloud integration with flexible pricing and strong support. In comparison, Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] delivers superior performance for graphic-intensive tasks, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing high display quality despite higher upfront costs.

Pricing

Horizon Cloud Service has a lower initial setup cost compared to Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients, which require significant upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Horizon Cloud Service has a lower initial setup cost compared to Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients, which require significant upfront investment.

Amazon Appstream

3.8 out of 5

Amazon Appstream

3.8 out of 5

Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] deliver high performance with dedicated hardware and security. In comparison, Amazon Appstream offers cloud-based flexibility and scalability for application streaming. Tech buyers might prioritize Teradici's reliability or Amazon's cloud integration based on specific business needs.

Pricing

Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] involve a significant initial hardware setup cost, whereas Amazon Appstream offers a lower-cost, scalable setup through its cloud-based infrastructure.

View comparison

Pricing

Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] involve a significant initial hardware setup cost, whereas Amazon Appstream offers a lower-cost, scalable setup through its cloud-based infrastructure.

Amazon WorkSpaces

4.1 out of 5

Amazon WorkSpaces

4.1 out of 5

Amazon WorkSpaces offers cloud flexibility and scalability for diverse environments. In comparison, Teradici PCoIP targets secure, hardware-based deployments. Amazon's scalability attracts companies seeking adaptable spending, while Teradici suits those requiring consistent, secure setups with predictable long-term costs.

Pricing

Amazon WorkSpaces offers a lower initial setup cost, whereas Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] may involve higher upfront expenses. The variance highlights significant contrasts in cost investment for organizations considering these solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Dizzion

4.4 out of 5

Dizzion

4.4 out of 5

Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients deliver strong security and high-fidelity desktop experiences ideal for secure environments. In comparison, Dizzion provides cloud delivery with scalable solutions and managed services, making it suitable for organizations preferring flexibility and comprehensive support throughout the deployment and scaling process.

Pricing

Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] have a moderate setup cost, while Dizzion offers a more bundled pricing approach, highlighting a difference in upfront cost commitment.

View comparison

Pricing

Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] have a moderate setup cost, while Dizzion offers a more bundled pricing approach, highlighting a difference in upfront cost commitment.

Inuvika

5.0 out of 5

Inuvika

5.0 out of 5

Inuvika offers competitive pricing and robust support, making it attractive for broad application management and accessibility. In comparison, Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients [EOL] delivers superior graphic rendering, ideal for environments prioritizing high-quality performance, despite higher upfront costs reflecting advanced capabilities and long-term ROI.

Pricing

Inuvika offers a competitive setup cost that can be more affordable for some environments, while Teradici PCoIP Zero Clients have a higher setup cost that reflects their specific capabilities and features.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

Application Virtualization

Remote Access