We use UiPath to automate simple, everyday processes like email automation.
We have deployed UiPath both on-premises and in the cloud.
We use UiPath to automate simple, everyday processes like email automation.
We have deployed UiPath both on-premises and in the cloud.
Using UiPath to build automation is easy compared to the other automation solutions I have used.
UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation, which is important because it helps us eliminate human errors.
The UiPath User Community is good.
The UiPath Academy courses are helpful, and all of our team members use them. We have learned a lot about UiPath from the courses.
UiPath helped to speed up our digital transformation and reduce the cost of doing so. We did not require any expensive or complex application upgrades or IT application support to speed up our digital transformation.
We have repeatedly tested our processes with humans and with UiPath. We consistently achieve better results with UiPath because it eliminates the possibility of human error in our reports.
UiPath saves our staff time by reducing the manual tasks.
UiPath has saved us money by eliminating the need for a person to perform repetitive daily tasks.
The ease of automation using UiPath is valuable.
UiPath should add support for more programming languages, such as Python, in addition to VBScript, to help developers with their coding.
I have been using UiPath for just over one year.
UiPath does sometimes go down, but compared to other automation tools I have used, it is more stable.
The technical support is good. I received a response within one day the last time I contacted them.
Positive
I have used Automation Anywhere for some projects, but UiPath is far better because of its easy-to-access and informative User Community.
The initial deployment is straightforward. All we have to do is publish and grab the data linked to the orchestrator. One person is required for the deployment.
The implementation was completed in-house.
The price is a bit high, but UiPath is worth the cost, given its ease of use and features. We sometimes use Automation Anywhere instead of UiPath to save costs, but UiPath is our preferred choice.
I would rate UiPath nine out of ten.
No real maintenance is required for UiPath.
UiPath is easy to use and automates well. It is also good at identifying errors compared to other solutions.
We use the product for contact center, HR, and airport operations.
The tool's most valuable feature is unattended robots.
UiPath's process mining needs to improve a lot. The generated reports are difficult to analyze by ordinary people. Task mining reports are also difficult.
I have been using the solution for four years.
I rate UiPath's stability an eight out of ten.
I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.
The support tickets don't get solved at times. We expect to support people with higher expertise when we open a ticket. However, we get less experienced individuals who waste our time.
Negative
The solution's deployment was straightforward.
Our partner helped us with the implementation.
UiPath is too expensive.
I have evaluated Power Automate and Automation Anywhere. The main differences include easy implementation and development.
The business objective that we tried to achieve with automation was enhanced productivity.
UiPath has fundamentally changed our organization's reporting and task-mining processes.
We use UiPath AI Center.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
I am the head of a division of IT that supports clients. We deal with various use cases in banking, insurance, and retail.
It is easy to set up drag-and-drop features to configure workflows.
The product must improve partner enablement and support midmarket partners. It will help mutual growth.
I have been using the solution for five years.
I have used Automation Anywhere. Automation Anywhere and UiPath are equally competing these days. Initially, when UiPath was introduced, there were a lot of differences between the two. However, UiPath overcame a lot of differences, and now it's on par and probably going a little higher than the other platforms.
The time taken to deploy the tool depends on the use cases. Simple use cases can be done in just about a month. Complex ones could take anywhere between two to three months.
The product is not the cheapest. It has an average price.
It is easy to build automation using the solution. A non-technical person can do a little automation themself. However, complicated automation needs a little scripting knowledge. The product reduces the cost of digital transformation and speeds it up. It does not require expensive or complex application upgrades.
UiPath has helped to minimize our on-prem footprint. Our clients in the insurance industry and government agencies are hesitant to onboard a cloud solution. Retail and banking clients are already on the cloud a lot. So it's easy for them to onboard a cloud solution.
The product enables us to implement end-to-end automation. We present solutions for automation to our customers. We need one single platform to support the automation. If a single platform does not support the automation, we might end up including multiple platforms in the solution, which will become complex. UiPath’s single platform helps us to automate end-to-end tasks.
It has freed up employee time. We save quite a lot of FTEs when we implement automation. I am not a single user. We implement the solution to multiple clients. Each use case has its own benefits.
It has saved costs for our clients. The solution reduces human error. It has helped our clients scale the digital workforce. My teams use UiPath Academy courses and get certified on them. When they get certified, I can sell the solutions with more confidence. I can get my team involved at various stages of the sales cycle.
Since we are a partner, I get access to a lot of content as part of the platform. I also have access to a lot of ideas that other users come up with. It is useful. We do not yet use the solution’s AI functionality, but there is scope.
Overall, I rate UiPath an eight out of ten.
I work for a software solution company, and its use cases are related to HR products.
UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation. We also tried a few payroll automations as a part of our software solution, and it worked perfectly. All the features, UI elements, and processes work well. It is very good. We were able to automate about 80% of the tasks or processes by using UiPath. It is a great platform for automation.
UiPath has reduced human error. It has reduced time for a task. We were able to reduce 80% of a task. We have automated 80% of the task using UiPath, and we were able to save six hours per user for one project.
UiPath frees up the employee time. After we have the software in place, we can see where we can speed up our processes. If a process can be completed in less duration, that also saves the time of the employee. So, it is a journey. You need to keep identifying the processes to improve. The time savings vary based on the process. For example, we use RPA for the HR payroll, and for 200 employees, we were able to save 6 hours. The savings will be more when you have more people.
The most valuable feature of UiPath is the speed of the implementation. They are continuously adding new features, and there is also fast deployment. It is easy to use. Before going for the enterprise license, we evaluated the capability to automate certain processes and get the outcome that we expected. UiPath has so many advantages, but we struggle in terms of investment and price.
I have used the UiPath Academy for business analyst certification. It is very helpful to understand the tools and features to meet any requirements. You get to learn what are the things that you have to follow. From the business analysts' side, you get to know how to identify the processes where automation can be used. You can identify the automation capabilities. UiPath Academy nicely guides people who are new to RPA. There are so many things to learn on the RPA side. The developers can identify the gaps and learn how to automate quickly and learn new skills. UiPath Academy helps people to understand automation from start to end.
On the investment side, it is a huge investment, especially with the current situation in Sri Lanka. If they can reduce the price or provide affordable packages, it will be very helpful.
On the development side, there are already so many new capabilities. They are also adding more AI capabilities. I have seen some of the users using AI tools, but I have not worked on them much.
We have been using UiPath for the past two years.
Its stability is nice. We get regular updates throughout the year, and we have to install those updates, which is not a huge thing for us. We have not had any issues with that. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.
It is scalable. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of scalability.
We use automation in different departments, and we are also planning to deploy some RPA use cases in the client environment. Currently, we have 280 users using payroll automation.
The technical support team from the reseller has been very engaged with the RPA effort. They have helped us with the cons and pros and to identify the capabilities of UiPath using the UiPath community version. They helped us a lot with our RPA journey.
I have worked with Automation Anywhere and UiPath, and I am now also using Power Automate. I used Automation Anywhere at my previous workplace, and at my current workplace, we have been using UiPath, but we are now also using Power Automate. We were using IQ Bot to identify invoices and process those invoices for the finance team. We have been using UiPath for HR and payroll automation.
In terms of ROI and investment, in Asian countries, such as Sri Lanka, we are unable to get a huge return on investment because of the price. We were looking for a solution with less investment and getting more automation, so we picked Power Automate for automation.
I was working as a project manager and consultant. I was involved in gathering requirements in detail and creating the processes. I acted as a bridge between the development team and business owners.
It was a straightforward process. We took two days to set up the process. In terms of the implementation strategy, we identified the use cases for automation. Business owners were responsible for coming up with the use cases and identifying the feasibility and the return on investment for using RPA. We went through each project brought to the table and identified some of the critical scenarios.
In my previous company, we got consultants from Automation Anywhere because that was the first time we were using RPA in our company. It was 2017 or 2018. They helped us in identifying processes, gathering details, and selecting processes for RPA. They were very helpful. Their developers also helped us debug the processes and improve the speed of the processes. They helped to identify the gaps in automation flow and enhance it.
From the development side, there were two developers and a project lead. There were also two subject matter experts or business owners, so altogether, there were five people.
For maintenance, one person is enough.
UiPath could not save us money because the cost of the bot license and the Studio license is high. For Asian countries, such as Sri Lanka, it is a huge amount.
We have been using the community version to identify the automation capabilities. We are also trying to sell the RPM modules to our clients who use our payroll process. When it came to purchasing, there was a huge difference in the price of Automation Anywhere and UiPath as compared to Power Automate, so we went for Power Automate.
It is expensive for our country. Other than that, we do not have any issues with UiPath.
Most companies evaluate Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Power Automate. Development speed, user-friendliness, and price are some of the factors that companies look at while evaluating a solution. UiPath helps with fast development, and it is user-friendly. There is also a community version to understand its capabilities before purchasing the license.
Both Automation Anywhere and UiPath require a big investment. Companies based in European countries get a good return on investment, but most companies based in Sri Lanka do not get a good return on investment because the cost is very high.
To those who want to use UiPath, I would advise understanding what digitization is and how RPA can help with their digitalization journey. Before using RPA, they have to standardize their processes in terms of the process flow. We encourage people to identify those gaps before using RPA. They should also select processes that provide a good return on investment. They can use the community version of UiPath to identify the processes.
Overall, I would rate UiPath a nine out of ten.
We are a partner of UiPath, and we utilize their solution for welfare unions and document understanding.
Building automation using UiPath is straightforward. I would rate the ease of building automation an eight out of ten.
UiPath enables end-to-end automation, which is essential to our organization because it saves time, is reliable, and is easy to use. Although it is somewhat expensive, it is worth the investment in the long run.
Being a part of the UiPath User Community helps us deal with various tasks. We can share our experiences with the members of the group and learn from the experiences of other members of the community.
Some of the benefits our clients have noted about UiPath are the speed and the reduction in operations at the end of the day. Our clients were able to achieve their goals quickly by using UiPath and witnessing a return on investment.
The introductory course of UiPath Acadamy is good.
UiPath accelerates digital transformation and reduces its associated costs. Initially, implementing such transformations may necessitate expensive upgrades. However, once the setup is complete, operations can run smoothly. Typically, when a company begins contemplating digital transformation, they often find themselves in a technologically outdated state. As a result, a comprehensive update of their systems becomes imperative, incurring significant costs.
UiPath helps reduce human error. It is highly beneficial to automate certain human tasks and mitigate the potential for errors.
It has freed up approximately 50 percent of our employees' time.
UiPath has saved approximately 20 percent of our organization's costs.
The UiPath Community is truly helpful.
Although we have to pay for the extra features that UiPath offers, they are extremely useful.
The introductory courses of UiPath Academy are adequate, but there is room for improvement. I understand that creating an automated course for everyone is not an easy task. After completing these courses, we are capable of performing simple tasks. However, if we truly want to learn, for example, Java, we must conduct further research on our own. The Academy courses should provide more challenging content.
The pricing in our region has the potential for improvement. The price is the same throughout Europe, despite the varying economies in each country, which poses challenges for all the partners involved.
I have been using UiPath for five years.
I would rate the stability of UiPath as a perfect ten out of ten.
I would rate UiPath's scalability as a perfect ten out of ten.
We previously used Blue Prism but switched to UiPath to meet client requirements. Personally, I prefer UiPath.
As a partner, we experience a return on investment because we bear the cost of the solution, and subsequently provide the services. The client pays for both the services rendered and a portion of the licensing fee. For us, the benefit is clear, but as a lean benefit, compared to the really expensive fee that we have to charge the clients to have a margin.
The price is high. On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the highest, I would rate the price as an eight out of ten.
We also have to pay extra if we want Studio, Document Understanding, even if APIs are not going to be used for text recognition, or Insight. Insight is really expensive and doesn't offer anything new other than Elasticsearch and Kibana, which are free tools. The message we have received from UiPath is that they are the leader in the market, and we have to pay for that.
We evaluated Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Appian, and a few others before selecting UiPath.
I give UiPath an eight out of ten.
I recommend that new users first take the Academy courses before transitioning to the UiPath Community version. It is advisable to learn all the basics thoroughly, without assuming any prior knowledge, and to exercise patience.
I have learned that using a machine is better than I am.
We automate transactional processes such as sales order creation and PO creation for UiPath automation.
UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation. It's a very good tool. It helps us to automate from input processing to output, which is very important for us.
We have been doing automation for the last four or five years, and we were able to achieve efficiency. We were able to reduce our workload and improve employee morale. We were able to eliminate human error, and we were able to improve process efficiency. From the payback standpoint, it took eight to twelve months. That's also because, after the implementation, we take about a month or so to make the solution more stable.
It hasn't helped to reduce our on-premises footprint because we are still doing most of the automation from the on-premises solution. We still rely upon certain ERPs, but it bridges the gap between multiple systems. It plays a huge role in terms of bridging the gap between applications.
It has reduced the challenges that we faced with digital transformation. We were able to achieve a lot through UiPath.
It has definitely reduced human error. We are able to get more mature processes.
It has freed up employees' time.
We mostly run things on ERP, so predominantly, the SAP model is used. Some of the features, such as web-scraping, are also very good in UiPath.
It's easy to build automation with UiPath. It's very stable in terms of having controls captured and putting some environment. It's a very stable environment for automation.
Its price is high compared to many other tools. When we go for any additional capability, everything comes at additional pricing. As a package, they can provide something that helps with scalability in terms of bot addition.
We've been using UiPath for the last four to five years.
It's stable.
It's scalable. We plan to increase its usage in the future. We have a centralized CCOE for the management of licenses and monitoring, and we have around four developers.
From the licensing standpoint, we are still at a very early stage. We have only 40 to 50 bots. We are increasing the number of bots every year, and we will go for additional licenses every year.
We are a part of UiPath's community, but we also used their support for understanding some of the features. I'd rate them an eight out of ten.
Positive
We still have Automation Anywhere. From the capability standpoint, both tools are equally competitive. However, when we go for a thin client application, UiPath is better than Automation Anywhere. Whenever we access an application outside the environment, there is a feature in UiPath called Citrix plugin to be able to capture controls. We see that feature as an advantage.
UiPath has all the features that Automation Anywhere has. There's nothing that Automation Anywhere has but it's not there in UiPath.
We took two tools as our adoption strategy, so we have Automation Anywhere as well as UiPath. We tried these two tools against some of the functions with various levels of complexity. We did a mapping of certain functions with Automation Anywhere, and we had certain functions with UiPath. We picked up a few processes, mostly the low-hanging fruit, and we were able to quickly implement those processes for process automation. It gave us a lot of confidence.
We started with a very old version. Five years ago, the version was different. We didn't face many challenges. Now, we are doing the migration year by year. It isn't a challenge.
Initially, we took some support from the professional services team, but we did everything in-house.
Generally, we have two people for each tool. In total, we have four people. They are senior developers.
We have seen an ROI. We are able to get an ROI through better processes. Apart from the infra cost, we have saved around 200K.
The price of both UiPath and Automation Anywhere is high.
The basic package is included in the price, but in case you require any professional or golden package, you have to pay a higher price.
I'm currently not using UiPath Academy, but we have different roles, and people who join our team use UiPath Academy. For example, business analysts who join our team use UiPath Academy to understand all the tool capabilities.
Overall, I'd rate UiPath a nine out of ten.
We use UiPath in the banking industry to help with the loan process. UiPath can check the title and address, and get documents from government and public websites. It can also check UCC scripts and the depth of support before feeding the information into the line of business application for the loan process.
Building automation using UiPath is quite easy.
UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation as long as the format is compatible.
Being a part of the UiPath user community is helpful because it provides us with a lot of resources for our internal research. We use the UiPath Academy courses to train our team members when we have new projects or implementations.
UiPath helped us reduce our on-premises footprint. The bots have taken over the repetitive tasks, freeing up our people to focus on other areas.
For some of our digital transformation initiatives, the solution helps reduce costs, but the extent of the savings depends on the licensing costs.
We only require IT application support for some aspects of our digital transformation.
Before UiPath, there was a human error rate of five percent on tasks. With UiPath, the human error rate has been reduced to three percent. UiPath can save people's time anywhere from a few weeks to three months, depending on the complexity of automation.
Document processing is a valuable feature in UiPath. It allows us to process various scanned and PDF documents, extract data from them, and further evaluate the data for business purposes. This could include income tax files that are required for load processing or documents for property inspection reports.
The templates are very useful to us. We reviewed templates for almost 400 similar scenarios where changes are made to two configuration files. These scenarios may be helpful to the customer.
The integration is also good.
UiPath needs to improve its onboarding and operational excellence.
The licensing cost and technical support have room for improvement.
I have been using UiPath for almost five years.
UiPath is stable.
UiPath's scalability depends on how we design the solution. Our clients are medium-sized organizations.
The technical support takes a long time to resolve our tickets.
Neutral
The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment usually takes a few hours. Configuration can sometimes be challenging because the deployment is across multiple instances of the orchestrator.
We implement UiPath for our clients. Minimal maintenance is only required for complex deployments.
Some of our customers have seen a return on investment within the first eight months, while others have seen it after 15 months.
The UiPath license is expensive.
I give UiPath a nine out of ten.
Based on the complexity of the automation required, I would recommend UiPath.
I use UiPath to automate tasks in our internal HR and finance departments, as well as to dispatch back office requests, close accounts, process insurance claims, and make international money transfers.
Building automation with UiPath is easy. It depends on our level of understanding of the process we want to automate. UiPath offers a wide range of possibilities for automating business processes. For example, we can use UiPath to get input data from files, extract data from databases, or make SQL requests. We can also use UiPath to manipulate applications, perform human actions on the user interface, and introduce back-office processes. Finally, we can use UiPath to distribute the execution of our automation across multiple devices.
UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation and orchestrate all processes using the orchestration tool. We can get the inputs for the process and execute the report at the end. We have all kinds of possibilities. For five or six years now, we have been able to automate all the processes that we faced, as long as the inputs are structured and well-structured, and we have a good flow and volume of inputs.
There are numerous advantages to using UiPath. Firstly, it can significantly increase productivity and reduce processing time. Secondly, UiPath enables scalability, allowing processes to be performed around the clock, seven days a week. Additionally, robots can execute processes with consistent quality, minimizing the risk of errors or incidents. Finally, UiPath can help optimize human resources by delegating tasks with low added value to robots, freeing up human resources to focus on tasks that require higher levels of expertise.
The time it takes to bring UiPath to market can range from a few days to several weeks. The return on investment can become apparent within a few weeks or months, depending on the complexity of the process involved.
When we refer to UiPath as a suite, it includes several tools and features that can greatly facilitate the automation process. For instance, we can group some commonly used features into a single library. Additionally, we can segregate the different layers of our development process. These abundant features can help us organize our work on UiPath, ultimately reducing our on-premises footprint.
UiPath Academy is a place where we can ramp up our skills very quickly and become operational as soon as possible.
UiPath's AI features provide a broad range of API applications, such as handling unstructured inputs. This includes non-digital inputs such as paper forms. Additionally, the system can process false inputs that are not well-organized through character recognition. UiPath also offers machine learning to further enhance its functionalities.
UiPath accelerates digital transformation and significantly lowers the associated costs. The impact is significant as it enables the deployment of production environments in just a few weeks. Additionally, RPA users can collaborate over the weekend to automate applications starting from the human interface. This allows us to automate more processes effectively. Other tools may require access to top-up bases or the use of Unix or scripts, but with RPA, we can automate a wide range of features based solely on the user interface component.
There were no expansive or complex application upgrades or IT application support required.
UiPath helped to decrease human error. By developing autonomous processes and thoroughly testing them, we ensure consistent and reliable execution, which guarantees high-quality results for our customers. Compared to human execution, global execution by robots is both more accurate and quicker.
UiPath saved us around 17 percent of our time.
UiPath helps to save costs in several ways, such as reducing the time required for execution. The main difference between manual and automatic processes is the ability to have UiPath execute tasks on our behalf, based on pre-defined reports. Unlike humans, who typically work from eight o'clock in the morning until six o'clock in the evening, UiPath can work all day, even on weekends. This can result in cost savings of up to 60 percent.
The queue feature is the most interesting to me because it allows us to work on a list of tasks in parallel on several robots. Additionally, the ability to integrate the OCR components is valuable. We use this feature for one of our banks in Africa. These are the most valuable features that we cannot find with other tools.
The pricing has room for improvement.
I would appreciate UiPath's assistance in simplifying our process of easily and quickly capturing our customers' business requirements within our framework.
I have been using UiPath for almost seven years.
UiPath is stable.
UiPath is scalable.
UiPath's technical support is reactive.
Positive
The initial setup is complex, and obtaining a license for training poses a challenge. As a result, an experienced person is necessary to complete the deployment. Our deployment required two people.
The deployment can take one to two days for an experienced person, but for an inexperienced person, it may take up to three weeks.
The implementation was completed in-house.
The return on investment is based on the complexity of the process that is being automated.
The cost of UiPath is higher in Africa than in Europe and Asia due to differences in salary levels. As a result, the number of customers who are able to use UiPath is limited.
We pay for additional components to include features, in addition to the licensing fees.
We utilized Selenium Test Automation for tests and conducted an evaluation. However, it did not fully meet our business requirements, so we selected UiPath.
I give UiPath a seven out of ten.
Due to the quantity of customer input, the success of automating tasks is not solely dependent on the capabilities of UiPath tools. The quality of the paper scan, document quality, and resolution are also crucial factors that can positively or negatively impact the possibility of a wide range of automation. Therefore, the success of automation is highly reliant on the quality of the source inputs, in addition to UiPath's capabilities.
Our implementation strategy involves beginning with the proof of concept and then separating processes before moving on to scaling the API.
I would recommend UiPath for large enterprise companies, as the cost of the solution may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
I recommend that anyone assessing UiPath should first create a clear automation roadmap. This will enable them to address questions related to optimization, implementation, and development.