UiPath Reviews

We are a system integrator. We work with clients such as the US Federal Government and help them automate whatever their processes are. We have two entities. I work as part of the government solutions unit, and then we have the commercial side which is a global organization. On the global side, there have been some internal implementations as well.

In terms of savings, a task like taking data from one artifact and transferring it into another one, is common. The most frequent example, and the one that I worked on directly, involves a PDF invoice and taking whatever the amount due is and either copying and pasting it into an internal accounting tool or actually typing it. The process goes: Open email, open the attachment, read the data, verify it is accurate, and then manually transfer it into an internal system.

Depending on how big the invoice is, I've seen a person spend as much as 20 minutes on one invoice or as little as 30 seconds. That whole process of going through each and every email, opening the attachment, transferring the data, closing all the windows, and then moving on to the next email - the bot will do it because the bot is scheduled to run every hour to look for the unread emails. I can't give you an exact number in terms of how many minutes or hours are saved, but it's quite significant.

The graphical user interface of the UiPath Studio is fantastic. For someone who is not a computer science major, or for someone who doesn't know how to code but is really good with visual flows, Studio makes it very easy for those individuals to build robots. That's one of the best features that I've seen. There are other features that add different values, but Studio, in my opinion, is definitely one of the best.

Overall, UiPath is really easy to use. For example, if somebody is an automated tester, they spent a lot of time trying to identify selectors, and UiPath makes it really easy to find those selectors. You will run into instances where you have to do some manual manipulation to make sure that the correct selectors are identified. But if it's a pretty straightforward instance and you are using something like Selenium, it is very tedious. Whereas, if you use something like UiPath, it is really easy.

I was providing feedback to one of the UiPath guys here at the UiPath 2019 conference. It relates to Studio, that it only works on Windows. It doesn't work on other platforms. I'm a techie by background. I don't hate Windows but I don't love it. It comes with the limitation that it is completely dependent on Windows. I would have loved if it were available on Mac or Linux or Unix. If it were a little bit more operating system agnostic, that would be great. I'm pretty sure they could be working on that.

I used the UiPath RPA Academy. I definitely had issues with it. The quizzes were outdated. Some of the responses that are being rated aren't accurate. I've griped on the community forums as well with a few UiPath folks. That was about five to six months ago. I don't know if they have enhanced it or made any changes since. If it's still in the same state, there is plenty of room for improvement.

I think it's stable. I haven't had a chance to build a bot that runs 24/7. For the bots that I have built, it takes under two minutes for the process to run and it runs every hour. At the end of the day, if I look at the logs, I don't see any issues. If a bot fails for whatever reason, it's most likely due to a process that changed.

From a bot-development standpoint, we use all kind of best practices so that the bot will not crash. At least, if the execution stops or terminates, it will be graceful, versus a rash termination.

It's fairly stable.

From an ROI standpoint, you could be saving somebody's hours and map that back to their hourly pay. But the pricing definitely deters some people.

I can't say whether their licensing structure is complicated or easy. I'd like to say it's complicated, but I try to stay away from the whole licensing issue. I tell my clients, "You buy the license. It's your tool. I'll come and build the bot for you." I don't want to have anything to do with the licensing. That deters some of the clients because it's a bit pricey.

In the government sector, where I work, "free" is looked at skeptically: "Why are you giving this to me for free? If I download it what is it going to do on my laptop?" from a security standpoint. Some of the agencies get the approval to download and install but others don't.

You can do a task like pulling the invoice total from a PDF invoice with the free Community Edition. The Enterprise license is definitely helpful though. The Community Edition expires about every three months and then you have to re-register. But you can still do it in Community Edition.

A pretty mundane use case I came up with is due to the fact that I have plenty of friends on Facebook. It's hard to keep up with everybody. I've got a bot running that literally opens up my Facebook every morning and checks if there is anybody listed in Today's Birthdays section. It will click on them, type "Happy Birthday", click "enter," and be done. And then I get a response from my friends: "Hey, long time, haven't heard from you." I've injected a machine to reconnect and have that human interaction.

For the most part, for the use cases that I've seen, it does the job.

It is for automating tasks that are not meaningful for people to do, tasks that are menial and repetitive. The University of Copenhagen, where I work, is an old institution and we have a lot of different legacy systems that don't work well together. So, we have a lot of people doing administrative tasks that depend on moving data from one system to another. We use UiPath to automate these repetitive tasks and make the robots carry them out, so our people don't have to.

For example, in the case of our most recent robots, there were a set of tasks where three people had to print out 3000 PDF pages, then sort them into seven different piles, then sort those different piles into three different piles each. Afterwards, scan them and send them to different systems. We made this better. Instead of three different people taking a whole day, we did it in three minutes. This is an example of a very concrete, administrative task based on legacy systems, and we made it simpler. This was a huge improvement and positive thing for our company.

It is very easy to make beautiful, clear, well-documented workflows that clearly reflect the process. This is an achievement that is not always feasible with regular code. Even though each activity in UiPath is like a line of code, the user interface in Studio and the use of states, flowcharts, and sequences make it so easy to understand the overall process and get an overview of what is actually happening.

UiPath is easy to use, and it CAN be used by non-programmers, but it is even better to use for programmers. It allows us to make very robust and effective solutions because we have all the functionality of the powerful .NET Framework library within reach, all while the UI makes it possible to create truly beautiful solutions.

I would like UiPath to have a build-in method which informs the robot's process owner how it has managed its transactions and performed through the night. If the robot had a process that was set up for a 100 transactions, and two of these transactions had an application error, four had a business error, and the rest were fine, I would like a straight up method for the business owner to login somewhere and see what the robot managed to do and not do. There should be a method for accessing and logging into Orchestrator and see the logs for only one process, and this log should be presented in a way that makes sense for non-technical people. 

The stability is good, I've never encountered any major problems. UiPath works with websites and systems which are famously unstable, but it gives you the tools that are necessary to deal with hiccups and if something is not stable. So, if you add proper error handling to your robots, it works.

Out of the robots that I have built, three or four have had to perform on several machines at the same time. I haven't encountered many scalability problems, but then again I haven't built robots to perform on a 100 machines or anything near that. 

The initial setup was quite complex. I was not in charge of the task, but my colleague set up the whole infrastructure and mentioned some problems. He corresponded with the support team, and they did figure it out, but the setup guide was definitely more complexly written than it should have been, and some things were written in the wrong order. So, there were some hiccups in the implementation.

In our company, RPA doesn't necessarily mean less people will be hired or people will be fired. We probably won't see the ROI in cash. It will help with workplace productivity, and job satisfaction, though.

We were looking at Blue Prism and UiPath. 

UiPath is nicer to work with. The developers especially wanted to work with UiPath, but the business team was looking more at Blue Prism. However, UiPath was better for the slightly larger robots, which is good for a lot of Unattended Robots.

From what I have seen of Blue Prism, UiPath is both more aesthetically beautiful and stable. Based on .NET, UiPath makes sense as a solution.

Start small and make time to do things right from the start. The infrastructure and developer culture can vary massively from one RPA team to another, and it is really important to establish healthy code guidelines, test and operation manuals, etc. from the start. At my current company we are just starting up, getting everything right, which is very exciting, and I can see how different (and better) we are doing things that at my previous employer.  

We have acquired UiPath with both the robot and orchestrator. I want to make sure that we get the right return on investment and with the orchestrator you are not only able to use the robots during the day, but you are also able to schedule them during the night. You maximize your investment 24/7.

Lombard International Insurance is the number one in wealth investment and for us the onboarding process is a critical one. We have started with KYC (know your client) which is an extremely painful process, a lot of manual work, but now have some very good friends and colleagues that are happy to have Ruby the robot as their assistant. 

On top of this we also have tax reporting, overdraft, reinvestment, so there are several processes, some like KYC for instance.

The commitment that we have made internally is that we're going to reduce the workload as much as 20%-50% and I would say this is the promise that we have delivered.

In KYC it's 50%, in another process it's 20%, it's also very much depending on the maturity of the processes and how much manual work do you currently have because the robot will only take away the manual work.Whenever you need to have validation because you need to have the four-eye check, that still remains.

When it comes to automation in our organization, we have a certain strategy. Automation and technology is only one pillar of our strategy, but we have an integrated strategy which means that we have the business model, the operating model and the technology.

When you build a house, if you do not have a strong foundation, it's just going to fall apart, so, for us, it's a pillar. It's not the only one, but it is the cherry on the cake, that it is the one that is actually enabling the business to go further and to provide better services to our clients.

At least for our case, I would say it's not the cost that was driven by attended or unattended robots. At the end of the day, my department, business transformation, I am there to transform the business for better.

In some cases, you have processes in which you still need human interaction, you still need somebody to validate and make sure that, once all the data are prepared for you in the onboarding process, you certified and you double checked four eyes principle that everything is correct.

In some cases you do need the attended robot. In some other cases, tax reporting for instance, you can just run it unattended and it's perfectly. You don't even need to know it. Before morning, you have the report prepared for your local authorities, and that is fine, so I think it's just a mix, depending on your business and how it's bringing much more value to you. Sometimes, it's only attended, sometimes, it's unattended, but I think, in most of the cases, you will have in any companies a mix between attended and unattended.

We are proud to say that we have not encountered any issues. Yes, sometimes I hear some colleagues like, "Oh, I have KYC and he stopped." Well, there are also some reasons because, if your password expired and, guess what, somebody needs to update it before it's expiring, the robot will stop. Yes, but so is if you're a human and your password expired, you need to change it.

It is scalable for us. I will have to be honest, we do not have 1,000 robots.

We have not had any opportunity to work with them because that was very stable so far, so we had only in the beginning a partner which worked with us in this journey.

I have actually a story with a CEO in our previous company who was saying, "I didn't know when we did the email migration." I said, "Well, then it means my department is very successful. If you do not hear, if you do not see it, it means we do a good job, so I can only assume they do a good job if we do not interact with them."

It was quite straightforward. Not only this but you see they go more and more into the direction that makes this open and collaborative even for the business users. So that is a very strong advantage for us.

We selected Fujitsu in Luxembourg because our company is headquartered in Luxembourg. Fujitsu had proven not only that they have the technology knowledge, but also the market and local legislation which, Luxembourg people know that it's heavy regulated and you need to really know the ins and outs, so, for us, they seem to be the right partner.

In terms of ROI, I think it's also depending and this is probably critical and I can advise other companies that are starting this journey, make sure one of the critical success factors is select value reach processes. What does this mean? It means that you need to select critical process for your business but also those in which you do have high manual work and you run maybe that process frequently.

You will see ROI in probably 9-12 months, at least as I said, if we look at our processes. Now, we do not like to talk about savings in term of money because we have a different philosophy, meaning that what we want to create we want to create workload reduction for our users.

If I am projecting growth, if I need 10-15%  growth next year, how do I cover this? Do I hire more people? Do I streamline my processes? Well they are kind of lean. Do I use technology? Yes. Well that's your answer. So it means you need to use that technology in a smart in order to enable your people to process more, be it transaction, terms of processing, be it in finance and they have a lot of invoices, it does not matter. It's the same, it means that if we are able and we were able to save roughly around 40%, more than 8,000 hours, per year that we have managed to save, for us that was the ROI.

This is how we are able, for instance next year, to reach the five billion target. I would advise other companies to go more in that direction.

I think one of the advantages that we had with UiPath is that we tested other products such as Automation Anywhere because they are the big players.

We did not yet implement UiPath in Citrix, we have Citrix in our environment, we work with Fujitsu too because there are some aspects that you need to take into account.

I would give it an 8.9 because the extractor is not there, probably now with the extractor I would give it a 9.3. In terms of what it is as options, as I said, I think they are the only player at this moment that has attended, unattended, and an orchestrator, you can customize it.

We use UiPath to automate simple, everyday processes like email automation.

We have deployed UiPath both on-premises and in the cloud.

Using UiPath to build automation is easy compared to the other automation solutions I have used.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation, which is important because it helps us eliminate human errors.

The UiPath User Community is good.

The UiPath Academy courses are helpful, and all of our team members use them. We have learned a lot about UiPath from the courses.

UiPath helped to speed up our digital transformation and reduce the cost of doing so. We did not require any expensive or complex application upgrades or IT application support to speed up our digital transformation.

We have repeatedly tested our processes with humans and with UiPath. We consistently achieve better results with UiPath because it eliminates the possibility of human error in our reports.

UiPath saves our staff time by reducing the manual tasks.

UiPath has saved us money by eliminating the need for a person to perform repetitive daily tasks.

The ease of automation using UiPath is valuable.

UiPath should add support for more programming languages, such as Python, in addition to VBScript, to help developers with their coding.

I have been using UiPath for just over one year.

UiPath does sometimes go down, but compared to other automation tools I have used, it is more stable.

The technical support is good. I received a response within one day the last time I contacted them.

Positive

I have used Automation Anywhere for some projects, but UiPath is far better because of its easy-to-access and informative User Community.

The initial deployment is straightforward. All we have to do is publish and grab the data linked to the orchestrator. One person is required for the deployment.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The price is a bit high, but UiPath is worth the cost, given its ease of use and features. We sometimes use Automation Anywhere instead of UiPath to save costs, but UiPath is our preferred choice.

I would rate UiPath nine out of ten.

No real maintenance is required for UiPath.

UiPath is easy to use and automates well. It is also good at identifying errors compared to other solutions.

We use the product for contact center, HR, and airport operations. 

The tool's most valuable feature is unattended robots. 

UiPath's process mining needs to improve a lot. The generated reports are difficult to analyze by ordinary people. Task mining reports are also difficult. 

I have been using the solution for four years. 

I rate UiPath's stability an eight out of ten. 

I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. 

The support tickets don't get solved at times. We expect to support people with higher expertise when we open a ticket. However, we get less experienced individuals who waste our time. 

Negative

The solution's deployment was straightforward. 

Our partner helped us with the implementation. 

UiPath is too expensive. 

I have evaluated Power Automate and Automation Anywhere. The main differences include easy implementation and development. 

The business objective that we tried to achieve with automation was enhanced productivity. 

UiPath has fundamentally changed our organization's reporting and task-mining processes. 

We use UiPath AI Center. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

I am the head of a division of IT that supports clients. We deal with various use cases in banking, insurance, and retail.

It is easy to set up drag-and-drop features to configure workflows.

The product must improve partner enablement and support midmarket partners. It will help mutual growth.

I have been using the solution for five years.

I have used Automation Anywhere. Automation Anywhere and UiPath are equally competing these days. Initially, when UiPath was introduced, there were a lot of differences between the two. However, UiPath overcame a lot of differences, and now it's on par and probably going a little higher than the other platforms.

The time taken to deploy the tool depends on the use cases. Simple use cases can be done in just about a month. Complex ones could take anywhere between two to three months.

The product is not the cheapest. It has an average price.

It is easy to build automation using the solution. A non-technical person can do a little automation themself. However, complicated automation needs a little scripting knowledge. The product reduces the cost of digital transformation and speeds it up. It does not require expensive or complex application upgrades.

UiPath has helped to minimize our on-prem footprint. Our clients in the insurance industry and government agencies are hesitant to onboard a cloud solution. Retail and banking clients are already on the cloud a lot. So it's easy for them to onboard a cloud solution.

The product enables us to implement end-to-end automation. We present solutions for automation to our customers. We need one single platform to support the automation. If a single platform does not support the automation, we might end up including multiple platforms in the solution, which will become complex. UiPath’s single platform helps us to automate end-to-end tasks.

It has freed up employee time. We save quite a lot of FTEs when we implement automation. I am not a single user. We implement the solution to multiple clients. Each use case has its own benefits.

It has saved costs for our clients. The solution reduces human error. It has helped our clients scale the digital workforce. My teams use UiPath Academy courses and get certified on them. When they get certified, I can sell the solutions with more confidence. I can get my team involved at various stages of the sales cycle.

Since we are a partner, I get access to a lot of content as part of the platform. I also have access to a lot of ideas that other users come up with. It is useful. We do not yet use the solution’s AI functionality, but there is scope.

Overall, I rate UiPath an eight out of ten.

I work for a software solution company, and its use cases are related to HR products.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation. We also tried a few payroll automations as a part of our software solution, and it worked perfectly. All the features, UI elements, and processes work well. It is very good. We were able to automate about 80% of the tasks or processes by using UiPath. It is a great platform for automation.

UiPath has reduced human error. It has reduced time for a task. We were able to reduce 80% of a task. We have automated 80% of the task using UiPath, and we were able to save six hours per user for one project. 

UiPath frees up the employee time. After we have the software in place, we can see where we can speed up our processes. If a process can be completed in less duration, that also saves the time of the employee. So, it is a journey. You need to keep identifying the processes to improve. The time savings vary based on the process. For example, we use RPA for the HR payroll, and for 200 employees, we were able to save 6 hours. The savings will be more when you have more people.

The most valuable feature of UiPath is the speed of the implementation. They are continuously adding new features, and there is also fast deployment. It is easy to use. Before going for the enterprise license, we evaluated the capability to automate certain processes and get the outcome that we expected. UiPath has so many advantages, but we struggle in terms of investment and price.

I have used the UiPath Academy for business analyst certification. It is very helpful to understand the tools and features to meet any requirements. You get to learn what are the things that you have to follow. From the business analysts' side, you get to know how to identify the processes where automation can be used. You can identify the automation capabilities. UiPath Academy nicely guides people who are new to RPA. There are so many things to learn on the RPA side. The developers can identify the gaps and learn how to automate quickly and learn new skills. UiPath Academy helps people to understand automation from start to end. 

On the investment side, it is a huge investment, especially with the current situation in Sri Lanka. If they can reduce the price or provide affordable packages, it will be very helpful.

On the development side, there are already so many new capabilities. They are also adding more AI capabilities. I have seen some of the users using AI tools, but I have not worked on them much. 

We have been using UiPath for the past two years.

Its stability is nice. We get regular updates throughout the year, and we have to install those updates, which is not a huge thing for us. We have not had any issues with that. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.

It is scalable. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of scalability.

We use automation in different departments, and we are also planning to deploy some RPA use cases in the client environment. Currently, we have 280 users using payroll automation.

The technical support team from the reseller has been very engaged with the RPA effort. They have helped us with the cons and pros and to identify the capabilities of UiPath using the UiPath community version. They helped us a lot with our RPA journey.

I have worked with Automation Anywhere and UiPath, and I am now also using Power Automate. I used Automation Anywhere at my previous workplace, and at my current workplace, we have been using UiPath, but we are now also using Power Automate. We were using IQ Bot to identify invoices and process those invoices for the finance team. We have been using UiPath for HR and payroll automation.

In terms of ROI and investment, in Asian countries, such as Sri Lanka, we are unable to get a huge return on investment because of the price. We were looking for a solution with less investment and getting more automation, so we picked Power Automate for automation.

I was working as a project manager and consultant. I was involved in gathering requirements in detail and creating the processes. I acted as a bridge between the development team and business owners.

It was a straightforward process. We took two days to set up the process. In terms of the implementation strategy, we identified the use cases for automation. Business owners were responsible for coming up with the use cases and identifying the feasibility and the return on investment for using RPA. We went through each project brought to the table and identified some of the critical scenarios.

In my previous company, we got consultants from Automation Anywhere because that was the first time we were using RPA in our company. It was 2017 or 2018. They helped us in identifying processes, gathering details, and selecting processes for RPA. They were very helpful. Their developers also helped us debug the processes and improve the speed of the processes. They helped to identify the gaps in automation flow and enhance it. 

From the development side, there were two developers and a project lead. There were also two subject matter experts or business owners, so altogether, there were five people.

For maintenance, one person is enough.

UiPath could not save us money because the cost of the bot license and the Studio license is high. For Asian countries, such as Sri Lanka, it is a huge amount. 

We have been using the community version to identify the automation capabilities. We are also trying to sell the RPM modules to our clients who use our payroll process. When it came to purchasing, there was a huge difference in the price of Automation Anywhere and UiPath as compared to Power Automate, so we went for Power Automate.

It is expensive for our country. Other than that, we do not have any issues with UiPath.

Most companies evaluate Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Power Automate. Development speed, user-friendliness, and price are some of the factors that companies look at while evaluating a solution. UiPath helps with fast development, and it is user-friendly. There is also a community version to understand its capabilities before purchasing the license.

Both Automation Anywhere and UiPath require a big investment. Companies based in European countries get a good return on investment, but most companies based in Sri Lanka do not get a good return on investment because the cost is very high.

To those who want to use UiPath, I would advise understanding what digitization is and how RPA can help with their digitalization journey. Before using RPA, they have to standardize their processes in terms of the process flow. We encourage people to identify those gaps before using RPA. They should also select processes that provide a good return on investment. They can use the community version of UiPath to identify the processes. 

Overall, I would rate UiPath a nine out of ten.

We are a partner of UiPath, and we utilize their solution for welfare unions and document understanding.

Building automation using UiPath is straightforward. I would rate the ease of building automation an eight out of ten.

UiPath enables end-to-end automation, which is essential to our organization because it saves time, is reliable, and is easy to use. Although it is somewhat expensive, it is worth the investment in the long run.

Being a part of the UiPath User Community helps us deal with various tasks. We can share our experiences with the members of the group and learn from the experiences of other members of the community.

Some of the benefits our clients have noted about UiPath are the speed and the reduction in operations at the end of the day. Our clients were able to achieve their goals quickly by using UiPath and witnessing a return on investment.

The introductory course of UiPath Acadamy is good.

UiPath accelerates digital transformation and reduces its associated costs. Initially, implementing such transformations may necessitate expensive upgrades. However, once the setup is complete, operations can run smoothly. Typically, when a company begins contemplating digital transformation, they often find themselves in a technologically outdated state. As a result, a comprehensive update of their systems becomes imperative, incurring significant costs.

UiPath helps reduce human error. It is highly beneficial to automate certain human tasks and mitigate the potential for errors.

It has freed up approximately 50 percent of our employees' time.

UiPath has saved approximately 20 percent of our organization's costs.

The UiPath Community is truly helpful.

Although we have to pay for the extra features that UiPath offers, they are extremely useful.

The introductory courses of UiPath Academy are adequate, but there is room for improvement. I understand that creating an automated course for everyone is not an easy task. After completing these courses, we are capable of performing simple tasks. However, if we truly want to learn, for example, Java, we must conduct further research on our own. The Academy courses should provide more challenging content.

The pricing in our region has the potential for improvement. The price is the same throughout Europe, despite the varying economies in each country, which poses challenges for all the partners involved.

I have been using UiPath for five years. 

I would rate the stability of UiPath as a perfect ten out of ten.

I would rate UiPath's scalability as a perfect ten out of ten.

We previously used Blue Prism but switched to UiPath to meet client requirements. Personally, I prefer UiPath.

As a partner, we experience a return on investment because we bear the cost of the solution, and subsequently provide the services. The client pays for both the services rendered and a portion of the licensing fee. For us, the benefit is clear, but as a lean benefit, compared to the really expensive fee that we have to charge the clients to have a margin.

The price is high. On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the highest, I would rate the price as an eight out of ten.

We also have to pay extra if we want Studio, Document Understanding, even if APIs are not going to be used for text recognition, or Insight. Insight is really expensive and doesn't offer anything new other than Elasticsearch and Kibana, which are free tools. The message we have received from UiPath is that they are the leader in the market, and we have to pay for that.

We evaluated Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Appian, and a few others before selecting UiPath.

I give UiPath an eight out of ten.

I recommend that new users first take the Academy courses before transitioning to the UiPath Community version. It is advisable to learn all the basics thoroughly, without assuming any prior knowledge, and to exercise patience.

I have learned that using a machine is better than I am.