UiPath Reviews

I have used UiPath for use cases that are both transactional and linear. It involves human resources, cybersecurity, OEM reporting, IT service management, service delivery, and examining of patents and trademarks. We work with federal agencies in the public sector. 

I enjoy the enhancement of UiPath's debugging tools. I like the IDE and integration services. There have been massive improvements. I love to work with Orchestrator. It has become more streamlined and helpful. 

UiPath needs to improve its documentation. AI Fabric's installation was an absolute nightmare. I tried to get help from the documentation portal and couldn't find what I was looking for. 

I have been using the product for four and a half years. 

We have seen ROI with the tool's use. One of my use cases involves the Patent and Trademark Office, where two GS-15 patent attorneys worked on patent suspensions. An unattended bot helped to save two full FTEs' a year's worth of work. 

We wanted to achieve less human error with AI-powered automation. We also wanted to streamline the process so that human involvement was less. Also, it helped us do more things than a human. 

AI-powered automation has increased accuracy for one of our use cases. We used AI Fabric and Document Understanding to help with reconciliations that came in PDFs. 

Automation has helped us free up our resource time by over 1000 hours. 

I last used Process Mining in 2020. 

I don't enjoy using Power Automate since its scope is limited. The environment where I use Power Automate did not purchase advanced licenses. UiPath offers more flexibility for programmers who are into API solutions. It wasn't available in Power Automate, which annoyed me. 

I run a team of developers and spend most of my time in Orchestrator. It is the best product from UiPath. 

We use UiPath to automate some of our financial and HR workflows and to send emails to clients.

UiPath helps automate end-to-end processes.

It helps reduce the speed and cost of our digital transformation.

We do not require expensive or complex application upgrades to speed up and save costs in our digital transformation.

UiPath helps reduce human error, reducing our labor.

It saves me three hours per week.

UiPath saves us costs.

UiPath is a strong brand.

I would like UiPath to work more with our local partners, to provide us with lower prices, localized functionality, and support.

I currently use UiPath once a week. 

I would rate the stability of Uipath eight out of ten. We have had some stability issues with our VMware.

The local UiPath partner we are working with provides very slow responses to our technical issues.

Neutral

UiPath is priced 50 percent higher than our local RPA solutions.

I would rate the pricing of UiPath eight out of ten with ten being the most expensive.

I would rate UiPath seven out of ten.

I'm using the solution for web applications and for integration.

The solution has improved our organization by improving processes, including documentation processes. We're able to increase our capabilities. We can use it to help us with large projects. Over the years, it's helped put less pressure on the server.

The integration services are quite effective. There are so many integration partners available. For example, we can use the solution with Jira.

It is easy to build automations. We use it to automate processes. We can use the product to automate good causes like sustainable production. However, we work more with web processes as opposed to good causes.

We do use it for end-to-end automation. We can ingest documentation, do a development phase and make our application. It's important to have this end-to-end capability. It helps us gain more knowledge and control.

The user community is definitely useful. If you have any issues or need something explained, you can use the community and gain more knowledge. We can share our knowledge as well. It helps clarify. It helps us interact with other humans to gain insights. 

It's helped lower our on-premises footprint. It's important to us to be able to reduce the on-prem footprint. It saves us space. It's helping us future-proof. It helps reduce limitations.

I've used the UiPath Academy courses. We can learn from ourselves, however, it does help. While we don't completely gain knowledge from the Academy, the solution requires users to go through a learning curve. It can show you the basics, and you need to go further by experimenting. I haven't used Academy courses in the last few weeks. It really does help with integrating services and understanding that aspect of the solution, however.

We plan on leveraging AI functionality. We haven't used it yet. 

It is helping with digital transformation. We can leverage architecture and different platforms much more efficiently. There are a lot of tools and upgrade versions that we need to go through right now. As we continue digital transformation, it will help make our processes more convenient and make tools easier to use.

It's reduced human error. However, the way our documentation is created, we won't be able to completely remove human interactions in the documents and can't remove human error completely.

The product has been able to free up employee time. We can build and complete a process very fast. 

We've noted cost savings when using the solution. We've been able to reduce licenses or move to community licensing.

A lot of implementation is done by UiPath, however, there are parts of the studio we've had issues with. We'd like the upgrades to be a bit easier and more flexible.

I've been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is stable. 

We have three people using the solution in our organization. 

The solution is scalable. We have a lot of applications and different scenarios. We can definitely scale as needed. 

If we have a lot of complications we can get support to troubleshoot. They have been helpful overall. 

Positive

We've also used Blue Prism and Power Automate. 

We find UiPath is easier to build on with drag-and-drop functionality.

Implementing the cloud version of the product is easy. Deployment is simple. However, it depends on your environment.

It's helpful to have some knowledge of UiPath. You only need two to three people to maintain the solution. If it's the first time setting it up, it may require more people.   

We do the deployment ourselves. 

I have witnessed an ROI. We've noted cost savings after implementations. 

The pricing can be a bit high. For single attempts at automation, it may be too pricey for a normal person. If you are doing a lot of automation, it's more affordable. 

I'm an end-user.

I'd recommend that users implement the solution. It's important to implement it correctly in the organization, however. The technology is far easier to use than other technologies in terms of reducing manual interventions in processes.

I would rate the solution ten out of ten.

We have two primary use cases. We use UiPath to scrape data from multiple websites and platforms, mainly for competitive intelligence and internal use. The other use case is basic automation, that is, moving files from one system to another when there is no direct integration. Through UiPath and leveraging RPAs, we pull data from one system, for example, an S3 bucket or Google Drive, and put it into our database.

The use of UiPath has resulted in time savings for our organization. It has probably saved us 40 development hours a month.

Building automation with UiPath is easy. If you compare it to building these scripts using Python or any other programming languages directly, then it is incomparable. If you write a .NET or a Python code, it will take a lot of time development-wise. The ease of building automations is very high compared to that with programming languages.

End-to-end automation is important to us in terms of deployment and development. Development is definitely easy, but the orchestration of those flows and deployment can be a hassle to maintain and manage. With UiPath, we are able to monitor the workloads and orchestrate the different workloads within the app ecosystem itself.

The UiPath community has grown and is active. It is definitely helpful to be a part of it because others can assist us.

UiPath Academy courses helped reduce the learning curve.

You can speed up digital transformation and reduce the cost of digital transformation using UiPath. It provides a good orchestrator, and the fully managed option can help reduce the burden on IT staff.

We have been able to reduce human error by using UiPath. Suppose we need to move files from one place to another. If we move it through a system and predefined rules, the system will not make a mistake. It will always pick up the particular file and concatenate it where it is supposed to. However, a human can, by mistake, concatenate one file to another.

For small use cases, it would be great to have independent runner licenses with costs that are comparable to those of Power Automate. Then, UiPath would be a better alternative.

The AI functionality was not that effective in complex scenarios when I used it some time ago.

I would like to see a universal recorder feature added so that we can record Excel macros. You could then click a button to record the screen, and then all the actions across applications would be recorded. This functionality is available already in Automation Anywhere, but the last time I checked, it was not available in UiPath.

I've used it for over a year.

UiPath is a stable solution.

It is a scalable tool.

I found the initial setup to be straightforward, and it took less than a week. You don't need dedicated staff to maintain the solution.

We implemented it ourselves. We had a team of three who worked on the deployment.

We haven't seen much ROI; it has been average. As a result, we are moving to Power Automate.

The pricing is competitive, and for large-scale use cases, UiPath may make better sense cost-wise. However, it is not very viable for small-scale use cases. Power Automate is much cheaper and has similar functionalities.

UiPath offers two options. If you choose the on-premises option, then you would have to manage it yourself, but if you go for the fully managed one, then there won't be any overhead cost.

We are gradually moving to Power Automate and Power Apps because we are already on the Microsoft stack, and it helps us reduce the footprint. If the cost of UiPath were comparable to that of Power Automate, then UiPath would have been the better alternative.

In my previous company, we used Power Automate, Automation Anywhere, and UiPath. The only good aspect of Power Automate is that it has very minimal cost implications. IQ Bot from Automation Anywhere is slightly better than UiPath's AI capability. Also, the ease of building automations with UiPath is comparable to that of Automation Anywhere and Power Automate.

Overall, I would rate UiPath at eight out of ten.

We started by looking for something easy to change our process, and we liked a lot of systems that had low code. We started to submit and sell orders and transform reports into dashboards with the robot.

While we have used it for a short time, we see a lot of future potential for us. We have other departments, for example, finance, HR, and engineering. We can use this solution to improve our workflows, our reports, and dashboards across departments.

We are looking for ways to save time and free up people. It is important. We want to remove the mechanical jobs so that people use the time they gain to focus on other strategies and figure out how to add value to the business.

They make it easy to change the process inside the routine. We can find out how to remove gaps and change the process. There isn't just one way; we have a lot of exceptions in our business, and with the robot, we can change to meet our requirements. There isn't just one way to do things.

The user community is helpful. We know a lot of people inside of this process and a lot of good people with good tools that can help.

We are just starting with the Academy courses. We're in the process of learning and have a PMO that is using the Academy. It helps us to better understand use cases and other situations. 

We'd like the solution to allow us to remove all developers. In a situation where you need a developer, we'd like it to get to the point where we don't need them. It needs to be easier to use with more low code. Low code is the future.

I've been using the solution for five months.

We find the solution to be stable. It's not just building the robot - it's being able to sustain it. So far, we trust its capabilities and have not questioned its stability.

I've witnessed some proof that the solution can scale. 

We did not need any technical support. We haven't used support yet.

We used Pipefy in the past. It's a BPM that has automation processes inside it. That said, it's so different as it's just for Pipefy integration to another system. It's not a kind of robot, so there's no automation process. We still use it. We work with them and UiPath. Right now, we use the workflow, and, if the workflow doesn't work or is bad at automation, we use UiPath.

We just recently set up the solution and are still putting in the work.

We just started to use the solution as part of a trial. It's still too new to measure an ROI.

The solution is expensive. It's almost the same as other options. However, it is a bit cheaper since we don't need a developer. We can just buy the license and use the product. 

We looked into Automation Anywhere, IBM, and another startup. Once we started to use UiPath and found out how easy it was to build our first robot, we stopped looking into other options. 

We like to fix, build and change by ourselves. The other options required us to need someone from the outside and to pay for a consultant or contracted person to assist us. With UiPath, we have ultimate control, and everything is in our hands. 

At this time, we do not yet use UiPath to automate processes that involve a good cause, such as social responsibility.

Right now, we use UiPath on a virtual machine, yet we're hoping we'll be able to go more mobile in the future. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten since we've only used it for such a short amount of time. 

Our company uses the solution for financing, accounting, and commercial operations. Right now, we are automating the lowest-hanging fruit. We look at people or personal productivity and automate their desktop tasks. 

We currently do not use AI functionality. 

The solution saves our company 10,000 hours annually. Automations have removed menial tasks from people's desks so there is instant gratification.

Studio and StudioX are really powerful tools. From the development side, business users have realized much success and have made great strides with StudioX because it is easy to use.

Automations are really easy to build with a minimal technical background. For example, my background is in accounting and finance but I am the manager of an automation team so that speaks to how easy it is to learn and develop. 

It would be useful to have co-authoring because we have many staff members working on the same project. 

I have been using the solution for four years. 

The solution is fairly stable. We have to perform maintenance on things we are doing and see some infrastructure issues for on-premises users. Many of these issues would be addressed if we switched to the cloud so that is under consideration.

I can see the solution's scalability. I think you need the right organizational buy-in for scaling but there isn't anything that the solution should be doing differently. 

The community is great and we learn so much there. We would like the community to bring back in-person user groups because we found a lot of value in knowing and connecting with other customers in our area. But, the community as a whole is awesome and invaluable. 

When we started our journey with the solution, we utilized the Academy for training. Since then, we have used the Academy to train three new team members because it quickly gets them up to speed so they can start developing. 

Technical support is good and we utilize it a lot. Sometimes it takes a little while to hear back from support. Though we understand, it also causes us heartache when tickets are automatically closed without a response. For example, sometimes we contact support on a Friday and the ticket closes on a Sunday which does not give us time to review our email and can be difficult. Otherwise, we like the technical support provided and rate it seven out of ten. 

Neutral

Our company did not previously use another solution. 

I was not involved in the initial setup. 

The price is high in comparison to Power Platform that Microsoft provides as part of its enterprise license. 

The pricing can be a bit confusing because many new products have been added. We just renewed our licenses and got all new SKUs because products have changed so much since our initial implementation.

I was not on the evaluation team but I do not believe other options were evaluated. The solution was chosen because it was a known leader in the industry.

The solution is great, works well, and is learnable. Users will be able to pick it up easily. People who are interested in change will find a way to make it happen, so you might as well give them a good tool.

There is nothing comparable in the industry that provides the same ease of use, great community, and good products.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

Our company uses the solution to automate used to be a completely manual set of processes. 

The solution has cut down the amount of time needed to process certain transactions. We went from fifteen hours to three hours of processing time. 

The solution has freed up human resources to work on other things. This has created a better work-life balance because staff are not stressed when working on a particular process. 

There is much enthusiasm around using the solution and we plan to take advantage of courses offered through its Academy. 

The solution is easy to use, has a good user interface, and processes transactions quickly. 

Initial deployment is very complex and some integrators need better training. 

I have been using the solution for one year. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable.

Customer service is good and I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Positive

The solution is the only one we have used. 

The initial setup was complex because our vendor was not as qualified as we thought and created code that did not work. The process to correct that was hard.

We implemented through a vendor but had many coding issues to correct. 

Our vendor experience was a four out of ten. 

The solution has gotten pricier. 

We did not evaluate other options. 

So far, we are happy with the solution. It seems very stable and scalable with many different uses. We are still in the early stages of using the solution, but things look promising. We are not yet using the solution's AI function. 

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We do a lot of manual work on a routine basis. We brought in UiPath to reduce a lot of routine work and mundane tasks that we do. An example would be that we have developed internal tools in our company. We need to back up the logs for these tools. Earlier, we used to log into a system, copy the logs, and then store them at another place, such as Amazon S3. With the introduction of UiPath, we are able to achieve this completely in an automated way. We have set up a UiPath automation to log into a system automatically, take all the logs, and then put them in S3 so that we have a backup for all those logs. This was one of the major use cases that we had, and UiPath helped us to achieve that at scale.

We are using the cloud version. We have more of a hybrid model. We have a pipeline through which we deploy everything related to UiPath. We have a beta endpoint and a production endpoint. Everything goes through the pipeline. Once everything is deployed in beta, we do our testing, and when we know that everything is safe in the beta endpoint, we push everything to the production endpoint. It is basically a pipeline system that we manage.

Our overall efficiency has improved. Previously, the manual tasks that we had to do consumed a lot of time, and they were also prone to human errors because they were manual. With the introduction of UiPath, we were able to reduce the time by half, and we were also able to reduce resources with these automations.

We don't use drag-and-drop APIs, but there are components that we drag and drop to build a UI that can connect to the backend robots. It has increased the effectiveness of how we implement apps. We can create the UI that we want visually, easily, and immediately. Through code, it would take us more time. UiPath's drag-and-drop functionality has drastically reduced the time because everything is visual. We are able to quickly build the app that we desire.

One of the features that I find most valuable is the Apps feature. We can easily create an app, or a web app, that can connect to the robots that we created with UiPath. It is just a drag-and-drop functionality, and we can implement an app with minimal code. Once we have the app ready, we can easily and quickly share it with other stakeholders so that they start using it. The apps are also pretty professional to be used at an enterprise level. That's the main feature I love in UiPath.

UiPath's community is great. It is a place where developers like us post questions and get answers from our fellow developers. We've been using that. Their community is very active. Some of the communities out there in the market don't seem to be as active as UiPath's community. Whenever I post a question, I get a detailed response within 5 to 10 hours, which is very good. My peers have also told me the same thing. We get support in the community, and we can also contact community members for help, and they are glad to help us with any problems.

UiPath is good in a lot of areas, but as an end user, I feel one thing that can be improved is UiPath Studio. It is an application that we can download to our system and then start building the use cases that we want. Sometimes, it takes a little bit of time to launch, and when we are building a complex application involving a lot of sequential flows, it tends to lag a bit. 

As a developer, initially, UiPath is a little bit difficult to understand because it has a lot of features and components available with it. Understanding each one takes a little bit of time. After we get into the solution, they can provide more out-of-the-box hands-on. It took some time for us to grasp the concepts and features of UiPath and then implement them. If that time could be reduced, it would be really good.

In terms of features, I'm happy with the features that UiPath offers.

It has been around one and a half years since I've been using UiPath in our company.

Its stability has been great. I've never seen it break or crash. It has been very reliable.

For production workflow, it is able to scale at high volume. It is able to take in a lot of transactions per second, which is really good for us because we have a huge customer base, and more customers are starting to onboard. The more RPA is used in the back end, the better it is. It is scalable as we expected it to be. It is able to cater to all the requirements that we have. 

One good feature of UiPath is that whenever I do a Google search, I get a lot of answers. The community of UiPath is very active, and they're great. Whatever question I post, I get a reply to it. 

They also provide professional service. We have the enterprise version, and they provide professional service and support. Anytime that we have raised a ticket with them, we typically get a response within 24 hours. That has been really good. I would rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

We haven't used any other similar solution. We had in-house solutions, but they were not scalable. They couldn’t operate when the user base was increasing on a day-to-day basis. We saw UiPath and immediately went through the documents. Once we knew that UiPath could solve all our use cases, we just onboarded it and migrated all our in-house solutions to it, and since then, we haven't had any problems. It has been great.

I was not a part of the deployment team.

We were able to reduce the resources. Previously, if we used five resources, then after we introduced UiPath, the number went down from five to three. We need two less resources with the automation that UiPath provides. There is about a 25% increase in efficiency with the help of the automation that UiPath provides.

I'm not aware of the pricing because I'm on the development team. The pricing mostly comes from our marketing team. They handle the pricing with UiPath and give us access to the UiPath licenses as a company. 

We didn't evaluate other solutions. This was the first one that we encountered. 

We have not used UiPath's artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities, but we are doing research on that. We haven't yet implemented anything in production.

I haven't yet explored UiPath Academy, but I have heard about it.

I would rate UiPath a nine out of ten.