UiPath Reviews

The primary use case would be automating repetitive human tasks: read emails to get data, then login to the specific application and select other data based on the email received and reply to the initial email.

The secondary use case would be integration between legacy software.

It has given back time to the employees, to focus more on tasks that would require creativity and decisions that are not binary.

It can input and retrieve data in and from the UI of almost all the desktop and browser-based applications. This feature would give you a way of interacting with applications that would trigger all the logic behind the user data, compared to DB integration, which would require more effort to have the same result.

They should define a yearly baseline build version that would support the next features without having to upgrade all the time.

What you can observe is the stability of UiPath Studio. Sometimes, there are issues with debugging or changing Windows sessions between devices, but the robot running is not affected.

There are no differences in using one robot or 70 so far.

The support response time is good for critical issues.

UiPath is our only solution for RPA from the beginning.

It was easy to set up in terms of high-density robots and disaster recovery. Everything is "click to install".

Development is done in-house.

I don't have access to this information.

Easy to set up, and now the licensing is more straightforward.

We were looking into UiPath, Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere to start RPA development.

Reformulate simple processes such as API access and virtual environments, e-mail access, spreadsheet completion and systems.

• Positive impact on ROI
• Process control and integrity of information
• Reduction of expenses and reduction of procedural errors.

• Easy installation, maintenance, and competitive cost
• Active community, forum, and academy with resources for individual user development.
  

- Arguing between scopes and activities is still confusing.

The mode of argument transfer of a scope (or activity) is done by a screen where a variable is indicated as output to which the subsequent activity (or scope) is indicated as input. In large projects, these arguments need to be identified in an easy, fast and unquestionable way. Assigns a variable value to then assigns that variable to the output argument, and then assigns an argument as input to another activity. I think this transfer should be done in the panel of variables and not in the properties of the activity



REFramework is good, but still very rigid.

REframework is a good template but besides being very generic it is also rigid with respect to error handling. Basically follows the default entry> processing> output which does not encompass part of the applications in RPA, we must remember that the tool is for scripting and falling into the programming vices is a mistake. Overall it is a good way to start processes but during development it will be completely changed

We used a free application with few features.

A complete and agile solution for companies of any size.

Easy installation and maintenance with lower costs than practiced in the market.

I studied all three major RPA markets, "Automation Anywhere" and "Blue Prism".

Automating the manual work such as daily work like data entry jobs, accounting work, storing in Excel and filtering the mail.

By working fast and getting new knowledge of RPA with the help of this tool. It reduces the human cost. 

Getting the mails, filtering that and downloading the required PDF and scrapping the necessary details from that, then updating it into Excel. After that, the saved data is updated on the website using Excel. Then giving the acknowledgment to the client, the process is completed or not. Using this overall, three hours of work will be completed in half or one hour.

It can work with all the Microsoft solutions to automate the work without any problem. After a one-step installation and day-by-day automation, it is improving the process.

It has improved the Citrix environment with the introduction pre-release of computer vision which can manage the total control of the image to indicate as a text and all the content. But the OCR engine still needs improvement; it may be in the next release.

Use in a stable website.

than a human.

Easy to install the application using "creating an account"   website.

The license cost is has a community edition.

No.

Don't use the recording for full automation because the 1000-time process records will be developed too slow.

I'm working in the banking sector, and as we all know, there exist many repetitive tasks which are actually done by human workforces. I'm automating them with UiPath. 

Accuracy, time and cost are the benefits I've figured out from my experience.

UiPath is a wonderful platform which helped me with automating many of the repetitive tasks including data entry, file processing, document classification, and many more like that.

As a software engineer, the features I felt the most valuable are given below:

• Version control
• Python support
• Time-saving
• The wide knowledge base on the internet. 

• The UiPath forum is awesome; we can find solutions to every problem from there. 
• It has nice support too.

The product and its documentation are very easy to understand and helpful, but I found some difficulties when dealing with the licensing. I hope they would make that clear as soon as possible. 

Then next thing to improve is the option to add activities into the work pane without using a mouse — actually, via real coders like keyboards only. So, adding more shortcuts would be helpful.

Highly stable.

It has a very scalable and easy solution, both in licensing and infra setup.

Support with a good knowledge base.

No, this is our first solution, and we chose it after a long time market study.

They are providing full support for setup, which includes Webex support too.

In-house.

I think the ROI is more than 100%.

I think when comparing with other products, UiPath has a flexible and simple licensing option, and their pricing is also good.

Yes, we have tried some proof of concepts with other software like Automation Anywhere, Kryon, etc.

They are also introducing AI/ML to the product. It's time to start using this so we can grow with them.

I have been working as a UiPath RPA developer for two years and three months. Using UiPath, I have provided more than 20 solutions over six different projects. UiPath was one of the leading RPA tools and it will be easier to develop when compared to other RPA tools.

UiPath has done a huge impact for our customers by replacing the linear jobs with robots. Tasks done by robots were fast and highly efficient.

Invoking VB.NET/C# code is one of the major features over other RPA tools. And recently, UiPath has implemented Citrix native automation for virtual machine automation which is an exceptionally great feature.

So far, UiPath has been good in every area. I would like to get more features in ML-related activities. ML will be the future for processing free text. Like for example , while processing free text from the customer comments, using uipath we cant extract the required data from the free text. Incase if you got ML related activities then it will be easier to provide the solution using UiPath

• Automatic filling of web forms for request of services
• Searching customers' and providers' information on government websites (to validate registration numbers and expiration date).

It offered us a new perspective for business processes improvement, looking not only for cost reduction but better accuracy and customer experience.

• The Studio tool: an environment for development with a lot of components.
• Easy to test or simulate the process.
• Flexibility to use attended or unattended robots on desktops and cloud.

The solution architecture should be reviewed to offer more opportunities to small companies or small entry level projects. For example, they could accept SQL Server Express Edition or other open software database engine; and allow all components installed in only one server, at least up to 10 robots.

They offer a lot of resources before you have to call them: great written material, videos, training courses and a forum.

No, only evaluate.

Initial setup is not complex. You can start learning to use the Community version of Uipath  Studio, before deploy production environment.

In-house.

The ROI was not calculated.

Uipath is competitive when you have hundreds of robots, but it is expensive to small companies or entry level projects up to 10 robots.

WDG (Brazilian solution)

YANK (Brazilian solution)

AUTOMATE

The Community Forum and the Academy are great resources to get users experiences and support and should be consulted before starting new projects. 

Creating proof of concepts for Oracle product integrations and form filling for clients. We are also in the works of using it to automate expenses in-house.

UiPath has helped us link legacy Oracle systems that have little connectivity through other integration methods. We are on our way to being able to link UiPath with machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate expenses.

The ease of use and how easy it is to pick up due to the low code functionality. The Orchestrator is also invaluable.

Making variables easier to find, perhaps integrating a "recommended variable" section for functions, and to filter variables better.

To automate the manual tasks at my workplace. Using this tool, we can quickly develop automations.  

At my workplace, I developed three automations which saved a lot of efforts and avoided manual interventions. We saved thousands of manual efforts.

• Screen scraping
• Data scraping
• Web recording, etc. 

The features of this tool are really awesome to use and very helpful to automate tasks.

There are no cons I found in this tool. A free license would help everyone to learn about this tool.