Wireshark Reviews

We use Wireshark to check the network traffic, and if there's any network problem or issue, we can check it through the tool. We also use Wireshark during analysis, to check if there's any network connectivity or attempts from the malware to communicate with the C&C server. We use the tool for further analysis and investigation.

I find Wireshark a very useful tool. Its best feature is that it allows me to deeply understand what's going on at the packet level, as well as any adverse signatures that I can analyze. When I need to create an IPS rule, I need to check the traffic deeply to get more insights about the actual traffic, what's the name of certain flags, etc., and I'm able to do all that through Wireshark.

The tool is also user-friendly.

A room for improvement in Wireshark is its ease of use for beginners. It could be better. Another room for improvement in the tool is for it to provide more details about the traffic load.

At the moment, Wireshark is adequate for me, so there isn't anything I'd like added to it in its next version.

I've been using Wireshark for a long time, so I can't remember the exact number of years I've been using it.

Wireshark is a stable tool. I didn't see any issues with its stability.

Wireshark is a scalable tool.

We never raised an issue or ticket with the Wireshark technical support team.

The setup process for Wireshark was very simple.

We're using the free version of Wireshark.

We didn't try to use other solutions apart from Wireshark.

Two hundred people use Wireshark within the company.

My rating for Wireshark is a nine out of ten because I like it and I use it so much.

I'm only a user of Wireshark.

Wireshark can be used to troubleshoot network issues, but also to baseline applications. When you know what an app does when there is no issue at hand, you will be better able to spot the problem when there is an issue. Everything that happens on the network can be analysed with Wireshark. However, the tool is as good as the person using it. You need TCP/IP knowledge to be able to use a tool like this. The more you know about packets on the wire, the better you can use this tool.

It gives us the ability to pinpoint problems and to communicate network problems with software and hardware vendors. The packets never lie!

Making different profiles to tune the tool for the problems at hand, the graphing options, to customize the screen layout, etc.

Also, shines for wireless troubleshooting, but most hardware does not give full insight in WiFi communication (beacon frames, etc.).

Big trace files (more than 1,000,000 packets) can be slow, but then you can use "TraceWrangler" (also free) to help with slicing and dicing the data.

This is no complaint, but is not an easy program. You will need to study to use it to its full capabilities (follow a course), but the more you know about it, the more you will use it.

No issues.

Big trace files need to be chopped for analysis.

My bug reports were in the next release, therefore a great experience.

I have used it more or less since 2001. So no, I did not use a previous solution.

Download, run setup, enter;enter;enter..., it is ready.

In-house.

It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?

In those days, there was a tool "Sniffer", but it was too expensive.

If you profile yourself as a network specialist, and don't use it, I would not trust you on my network.

It is even referenced in the book "TCP/IP Illustrated, Vol. 1", the TCP/IP bible!

I use Wireshark to analyze packets, especially network packets.

Wireshark's best feature is that it's adaptive, which means it's the go-to tool for network-related developers, as when the new protocol comes up, it's rapidly applied to the system, so I can just look into the packet. For example, I'm working in the automotive industry, and Wireshark supports some IP protocols, which not many tools do.

Wireshark's UI isn't easy to handle and doesn't have as nice a view as Omnipeek.

I've been using Wireshark for over twelve years.

Wireshark is stable. When it changed its UI from a legacy one to the acute, there were some crashes, but that was a while ago, and now it's pretty much stable.

Wireshark provides some macro functions and a custom parse protocol for the new protocols, so it's quite scalable.

As it's open-source, Wireshark's customer service isn't as sophisticated as private products. Developers are welcome to contribute their help, but if no one is interested in your particular issue, there's likely no mode to come up with a solution. 

The initial setup was straightforward and only took a couple of minutes to complete.

We use the free, open-source version of Wireshark.

The most important thing for new users of Wireshark is to get used to the filtering functions because all the filters are based on command input, so the ability to organize the right filter is essential. I would rate Wireshark eight out of ten.

It's a tool that we use to capture the network and if there is any lag or if there are packet drops.

It's a very useful tool. We are using it to monitor any network depreciation. For example, suppose there's a call going on between two IP phones and one person says that I cannot hear you. There's definitely something wrong. The RTP is getting dropped, and the packets are getting dropped. We need to capture the live call or if there are any prerecord calls for this particular time period. We go ahead and use this tool to find out whether the packets dropped when a packet is dropped and what caused the audio issue or video issue. We actually use it to understand any network issues.

I've been using it for quite some time, and I find that it's very user-friendly. The interface is good. 

The options that are required to get the details for the packet drops are good. All the options are available for whatever is required. I can choose any of them and search easily, and I can also pull the report and publish it to the team or whoever requires it. 

It's easy to set up.

I can't suggest anything as of now regarding Wireshark. I have never found any issues or had any difficulty using it. Be it connecting the system to the network directly and capturing the data through Wireshark, or for a specific time, it's been flawless. I have got the results every time I've needed them. 

You need good network connectivity to download during the setup, otherwise, it might take a while.

I have been using Wireshark for almost six years. I've used it for a while at this point.

The solution is stable. It's reliable. It offers good performance There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

Almost everybody in our company is using the product. That's likely around 1,000 people. Here, we always work on the network devices, and we need to use this tool to understand if there is any issue with that network or if there is any issue with the calls. Therefore, almost everyone uses it within the network team.

In terms of scalability, if you look at it, there's no limit. There's no restriction on how many users can use it. However, it depends on the organization. If you need any approval to download it usually needs special permission. 

I never had to reach out to technical support regarding Wireshark. Whenever I've had to use it, it worked properly and there was no issue to complain about.

It is easy to set up. We just need to download it and choose the options while setting it up. That's it. After that, it should be done.

The download itself doesn't take a lot of time. It depends on the bandwidth of your network. If you're using a good network connection, then it hardly takes a minute to download.

It is open-source. Anyone can download and use it. 

I use the solution to support my customer's environment. I am not a partner or reseller. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Wireshark is more of a packet capture tool. If you are in a network environment, where you are supporting the customer and looking after the issues with network drop, network devices, or IP calls, you must have a Wireshark on your PC. This is a tool that gives you a clear-cut idea about where the issue is, and where the packs are dropping. It's an excellent tool. Everyone should start using it.

I use Wireshark for DT inspection of several protocols and choose different color patterns to make it easy to see the various protocols. It also involves live analysis because I can see the live analysis on the Internet. The main task of Wireshark is to inspect the throttle and live data, and it's doing them.

I like the filtering feature as we can filter data easily. This feature is also available in tcpdump, but it's a simple piece of software. Wireshark is more advanced and has many features. It allows you to filter a lot of things. The output can be filtered easily.

The most important feature is colorization. If I say, "Okay, this particular SMB protocol in red, it will show me red." It's easy to identify that protocol or capture data. 

It would be better if they offered a hybrid version like My Cloud Control.

I have been working with Wireshark for about five years.

Wireshark is a stable solution.

Wireshark is a scalable solution. Almost all protocols are covered by Wireshark. 

I have never contacted technical support. If I have an issue with some functionality or operation, I use Wireshark's community support or Google the information I need.

I was working with Nmap and Cisco Analyzer, but then I started working with Wireshark. Before that, I used another packet analyzer called tcpdump, which is similar to Wireshark.

The initial setup is straightforward. I just downloaded the software and installed it. I completed the whole process within two minutes. It's very simple.

I implemented this solution. 

I am using the free version of this solution.

It's a user-friendly solution. I can start by capturing the interface's data because it will show me the number of interferences. Then I have to select and begin the inspection.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Wireshark an eight.

We are using Wireshark for inspecting the vertical line to know the data flow in and out of the cables. This is to determine if there is real traffic flow through the physical connections or not. 

Additionally, we use Wireshark for physical inspection on the data line.

Wireshark saves a lot of time, especially with network troubleshooting.

The features I find most effective in Wireshark include the current speed monitoring, data flow inspection, PPPoE clients, and inspecting our advanced switches and routers. 

Packet capturing capabilities are what I'm currently using the most.

The speed of the Internet could be improved, especially its performance. Performance can sometimes be a challenge due to numerous factors.

I have been working with Wireshark for more than five years.

I would rate the stability of Wireshark as nine out of ten.

Wireshark is quite scalable, and I would also rate its scalability at nine out of ten.

The initial setup of Wireshark is simple for new users. However, there are complex features that require expertise to understand. The interface is easy, and everything is well-arranged, allowing users to find functionalities easily from the options tab.

Wireshark is priced at a medium range, not too high, not too low. The pricing could be more flexible, and they might make it more expensive. That said, compared to other products, it is competitive.

I have heard from colleagues that other solutions do not provide exact results. Comparatively, Wireshark is better and more popular.

I recommend Wireshark to users of both small and enterprise-level companies. It is effective for the minimum business and large enterprise scales.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

We use this solution for troubleshooting network issues.

The strongest feature of this solution, is the ability it gives us to carry out deep-packet inspections on our network, particularly when a function isn't performing as it should.

We would like the product to be developed so that it doesn't rely on internet access for installation. We would like to see all of the components required to be integrated into the installer.

We have been working with this solution for around three years.

This is a very stable product.

We have found this solution to be scalable across all operating systems.

The initial setup of this solution is very simple.

We are using a freeware version of this solution, so there are no licence costs involved.

We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

This solution is deployed on-premises.

Wireshark provides many different functions which are very useful for my job. There are a lot of features, and I still haven't used everything yet. It's easy to troubleshoot issues because there's a large online community.

DNS could be improved.

I have been using this solution for 10 years.

The scalability is pretty good. If I have a big file, I can always divide it into smaller ones. I haven't had any problems with opening big files.

There's a big community of people on the internet involved in Wireshark. There are a lot of free resources on Wireshark. If I ever need anything, I just search on YouTube, and there are people that are analyzing or troubleshooting a particular issue with DNS or with retransmission, etc.

Setup is very easy. It's simple to install it on your PC.

We have a software team that automatically installs the solution on our PC, and a variety of my colleagues use it for troubleshooting. There are multiple teams involved.

Deployment was done in-house.

Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark.

I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. 

Wireshark is very good for network engineers. It's free software, and you can install it very easily, and there are a lot of features. I mainly use Wireshark in Windows. My advice is to do research on the internet, especially on YouTube, if you have any troubleshooting issues.

It's a very popular solution, and if you're able to, I think it would be helpful to donate to the organization so people can continue to develop Wireshark.