We have Zerto as an emergency backup if we were to lose electricity or compute.
I purchased Zerto because I wanted to get a return to operations and to minimize the downtime.
We have Zerto as an emergency backup if we were to lose electricity or compute.
I purchased Zerto because I wanted to get a return to operations and to minimize the downtime.
The return to operations is the most valuable feature because it decreases the amount of time it takes us to recover.
Zerto is the best of breed when it comes to providing continuous data protection.
It has a number of features rolled together. So when we need to failover, it does it successfully without a lot of stuff that we have to tune underneath the scenes. We use Zerto for the short-term retention of the data.
I would rate its ease of use as an eight out of ten. It has made it a lot easier for us to failover. Usually, in the past, we had to manually go and bring things up and this automates it.
The solution decreases the time it takes and the people we need when we need to fail back or move workloads. It saves around eight hours and one person. We had started off with two to three people.
It could save us time in a data recovery situation due to ransomware or other causes but we haven't used it for that.
We haven't had something where we had to recover data using this product, but I assume it would reduce the number of staff involved in data recovery situations.
It has helped to reduce downtime in testing but we haven't had a serious issue where we had to switch over and use it.
The documentation needs improvement in terms of the setup, getting enough detail, and getting that up to speed.
I have been using Zerto for about a year.
We found Zerto to be pretty stable.
We haven't had problems with scalability.
We don't really have users. We just have data that we move over which is basically the size of the campus.
We need at least one full-time employee to run it.
It's used for all of our failovers so it's in 100% usage.
I have had a little bit of experience with their technical support. I don't have any issues with them.
The ease of use, compared to other products, is much better. Zerto is all-encompassing.
We had to work on it for about a week to get it running the way we wanted. It took so long because of the fine-tuning. We could have set it up within three hours or something just as a test to see at work, but not necessarily do everything we wanted to do.
The time it took to sync the data up took a little bit longer.
We'll probably see ROI in around three years.
The pricing is more expensive, but the functionality is what we wanted.
There are no additional costs to standard licensing.
We also looked at Druva. We liked the flexibility that we get with Zerto.
You'll be happy with Zerto.
The biggest lesson I have learned from Zerto is to be patient.
I would rate Zerto a nine out of ten.
We were able to replace most of VMware SRM with this solution. It allows us to failover individual machines or application clusters with ease. The one thing that it does not do nicely is a full site failover. We have never needed that aspect though (only for testing).
We have leveraged the individual server failovers a number of times, and it has saved us a lot of man hours (doing things such as rebuilding, fighting viruses, or forcing more servers to failover than we wanted). It has been a phenomenal addition, and proved its worth in the pilot phase, when it saved us from having to rebuild a machine that was included in our pilot trial.
Journaling allows us to leverage Zerto's journal for sub-minute recoveries, instead of having to wait for the storage array to replicate. The solution is well worth the money invested.
The full site recovery is not up to SRM standards. Within a VPG, you can do great failover timing as well as ordering and scripting, but if your site contains many VPGs (as mine does), then it is difficult to manage failing over between sites, especially if you are at the site that was impacted.
None. Even the upgrades are speedy and easy.
None. As long as you have the licenses, it goes smoothly.
I have contacted their vendor support in regards to backup performance of SQL databases. They provided me with adequate instruction and background information to be able to adjust my environment to better suit Zerto's processes. It's been smooth sailing since.
VMware Site Recovery Manager. We changed from this vendor because we hit the 75 license threshold and were forced to consider the conversion to Enterprise. We searched the marketplace and Zerto was a great fit for our needs.
It was straightforward and easy. I was able to install it myself without any help from Zerto.
In-house was all that was necessary. It only required one engineer to work for about two hours to install everything, and then a week to configure and protect the entire environment. This will vary depending on your link to your DR site.
The cost is steep, but once you experience recovering a single server along with its granular restore times, you will see that the cost is justified.
We evaluated Unitrends.
Make sure that you understand the limitations of any software before you dive in. Make sure you document your use cases and have the vendor show you how it can perform those tasks.
Our main use case for this solution is disaster recovery, migration and app testing.
Zerto helped to reduce downtime. I worked a lot in a consulting capacity and experienced DR situations where XYZ was down or a data center was down. Using Zerto to get them back up and online was a lifesaver.
Zerto reduced the staff involved in data recovery. It's a tool that allows you to do a lot just with one person at the console.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the live migration.
This solution could be improved by being more cloud agnostic.
I have been using this solution for eight years.
This is a very stable product. I've never heard anybody complain about its stability. I would say it's probably one of the best out there.
This is a scalable solution.
The technical support for this solution is good and their staff are knowledgeable and able to assist quickly with resolutions.
I would rate them a nine out of ten.
Positive
I've used several other products including Site Recovery Manager. Zerto is the easiest to learn. There is much less of a learning curve. Other tools specific to VMware are now trying to emulate what Zerto has done to make processes easier. Zerto was a huge step in making things more simple to manage. The app works really well and integrates with VMware really well.
The initial setup is straightforward, especially if those setting it up understand the company's infrastructure. The problems are not directly related to Zerto itself. They're always related to how the infrastructure is set up or how the network itself is segmented and having certain people that have control or access and others that don't.
The return on investment is in the ease and functionality of the tool as opposed to actually a gain from using the tool.
There may be less expensive solutions on the market but with Zerto, you get what you pay for. A lot of people don't like to think about the price until it's already happened and then the price is too high because they would be losing either way. It's better to think about it and pay for it upfront than pay for it after the problem.
We previously used and considered Site Recovery Manager.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for continuous data protection and cloud onboarding.
The analytic tools are great.
The external API is something we're using quite a lot. It was upgraded, however, we still haven't upgraded to nine. We were starting to work at six, then seven, then eight, and now we are at eight of five updates. We've been working with this product quite a lot, and they have constantly added a few features. The long-term journal is one feature that is useful in that it allows us to use the product as both CDP and backup. You don't need the backup and disaster recovery tool. That's lowered the overall maintenance and operational costs. The OPEX gets reduced, once you use these two products.
They have reasonable support. The Zerto university for training staff is very useful. It's very easy to get people on board and to get technicians to work and be familiar with the product. The virtual labs are very useful. You have a sandbox and you can easily play and try the product.
Unlike other products that split the VPG into protection plans and activation plans, they're doing everything within the same location.
Technical support is good.
It's a very stable solution.
They could improve their online documentation.
From a reliability perspective, the product is around seven. It's less reliable than, others for example. They have one limitation when they have a virtual protection group that does everything.
From the ease of deployment perspective, it requires expertise and time. It's not very easy to do auto-tagging or to run multiple VPG genes at the same time. So, from multi-tenant or multi-complex scenarios such as using Zerto external products, such as firewalls, while their own product is good, it's part of a larger ecosystem, that still has a long way to go.
The triggering of external products could be better. Combining a master runbook and not just a single VPG or splitting the protection group from the activation plan could be better. There will be a protection policy and activation policy as being done in other products.
Better tagging and better multi-term support are needed. Currently, there is no tenant admin support, only global admin support. They should work at the tenant level instead of the global admin level.
Right now it's an HPE product; they're no longer a startup. We are hoping that being bought by a major company will do good for them and they'll fix what needs to be fixed. There were very good products, to begin with, and HPE should work to make it even better.
We've been using the solution for the last three years at this point.
The stability of the product is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable and the performance is good.
Technical support has been great. We are happy with the level of support.
We use both on-premises and cloud deployments. In terms of the cloud we are using, we are using Azure. We are using our own Cloud provider; we are using VMware Cloud Director.
I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We are happy with its capabilities. They are a very good product, however, they are not perfect just yet.
Our primary use case for Zerto was to enable replication at our DR site for virtual appliances and automation of the failover - failback process. This also gets utilized for recovery at our DR site at different timestamps using the journal history.
This solution is very light, with zero-touch deployment and very enhanced dashboards.
It has enabled DR protection for virtual appliances with minimal administrator time. This solution also provides a backup option at the DR site without any additional cost of licenses. The Dashboards are very intuitive and can be published to the CIO and CTO.
We loved the orchestrator, which allows us to specify IPs for our DR site in advance. It also allowed us to pre-configure the boot sequence for a failover test or actual recovery. Backup at the DR site is the icing on the cake. The concept of a journal history and keeping snapshots at intervals of seconds are quite good.
Mobile features are there only for visibility and not to take action. We would love to see the ability to perform actions through mobile apps.
It would be helpful if the reports can be generated periodically, on a schedule.
This solution is very stable.
This is a scalable solution that also supports multiple clouds.
Our earlier solution doesn't have a detailed orchestrator and didn't support appliances.
It is very easy to set-up this solution.
We implemented this solution in-house, without the need for any partner to assist with the set-up.
There is no need to think of ROI as this is a DC-DR solution.
The solution is very cost-effective and very easy to set-up but does not compromise on features. The features are much enhanced compared to any other DC-DR solution.
Before choosing this solution we evaluated VMware Replication & Sanovi.
Overall, this solution is quite enhanced compared to other, similar solutions in the market.
I recommend trying this solution.
There are many valuable features. However, the one that sticks out the most is the simplicity of the process to protect or migrate a virtual workload.
It enables protection of a virtual workload to be done by the app, whether single or multi-tiered, with a boot time scheduler. It is pretty awesome.
Zerto has changed how we think about protecting virtual workloads. It has enabled us to think about real time protection with full replication that provides checkpoints every few seconds and enables quick (< 10min) recovery times.
Zerto is solid. However, they are working on a cloud workload protection and protecting virtual workloads to more than one site. This is good stuff.
We have been using the product for more than two years.
Zerto is stable and works as expected.
Zerto scales as you scale your virtual environments. It simply and quickly protects virtual workloads.
Zerto’s support is good. They are quick to contact you back and get working on any issue. This is hard to get from other vendors.
I have been performing DR/migrations/replication for over 15 years. I changed during a bake-off of different products based on:
Zerto simply is the tool for protecting any virtual workload. I have set up and protected:
It is extremely simple to set up and use.
The Zerto setup was straightforward. It is one of the simplest tools I have ever deployed to protect virtual workloads. It works hand in hand with VMware features such as DRS/HA, so there is no issue when your workload moves around.
Zerto’s licensing model has changed a bit over the last year and they are in alignment with others. It is pretty simple and more economical.
Put it in place as it will become your default tool for VM protection and replication, hands down!
We use it for DR and general backup. We have snapshots or shadow copies with Microsoft and we do Zerto backups to our other locations so we can always get the data back.
We bought Zerto, in the beginning, to migrate a very important system of the airline from a co-lo that was managed by the co-lo to our on-prem. As an airline, you can't be down because you could cause a ground stop. With Zerto, we were able to migrate all those things across to on-prem without touching anything or losing any time. We took very little downtime.
Also, we've run into some situations where, for some reason, Windows has lost some of the files. I have been able to fail it over to our other data center and they were back up in 10 minutes.
The speed of recovery with Zerto versus other disaster recovery solutions is vastly better. Whereas with the others, I'd have to spin through a lot of stuff and find things, with Zerto I can scroll back in the GUI, find the one I want, and restore it. If that's not right, I can destroy it and go back a little bit more in time.
And our being an ultra-low-cost airline, we don't have staff, so it helps in that way.
It has also helped our DR testing because we can fail over the main part that runs the airline within 45 minutes. The first time, it took me an hour and a half. The second time, it took about an hour. The last time I did it, it took about 45 minutes. That's within the timeframe of one hour where we don't have to do a ground stop.
Moving the VPGs from one location to another is a valuable feature. You just click on it and move it and it's done. We have a stretch VLAN between our data centers so it's really easy: this is IP here and the same IP is there. So if something happens or somebody wants to test something, I can fail it over.
Another aspect that I use a lot is that I can fail it over into its own little bubble and I can install software that I want to test to make sure it doesn't break something. I can do that and then roll it all back.
If there is a mass of changes to a server, Zerto will restart the replication. It would be nice to know why that happens.
The other thing that I've run into lately is that when I've done a whole bunch of upgrades to systems, so they're offline, they get stuck in a pending state. You can never get them out so you have to delete and start all over again. It would be nice if they could make it a little simpler to figure out what's wrong.
I have been using Zerto for about six years.
It always just runs. I don't have to worry about it or keep checking it. It just does its thing.
It's very scalable. Fortunately, we bought a bunch of licenses when we first bought it and we've been growing into those licenses over the years. It has been very scalable for us.
The technical support has been good, although I've had a couple of situations where they've said some things that were totally inaccurate. But you have that in all organizations.
Positive
Since I started with this airline, we have gone through two other solutions. Zerto is the third and we've stuck with it for quite a few years.
One of the other solutions was a direct product that dumped everything to a storage area in the cloud and it never was consistent. The other was a Dell application backup that no longer exists. That was just too limiting and its backup was never consistent.
Zerto is much easier to use. Once you get the concept down of what it's doing, it's really easy to bring up backups, restore backups, move things around, and test things. It's very easy.
I had one of their sales reps in Colorado help me through the setup. Then we just took it over.
The ROI is in "funny money." It's my time and how long something is down or how long it takes somebody to restore something, and that is much faster.
The pricing seems really good. We're an enterprise customer, so we get all the bells and whistles.
We evaluated a couple of things, but one of our co-los was actually using Zerto so we looked at it as a result. That is what led us to buy it.
We use Zerto for disaster recovery data replication from our headquarters to an offsite data center at another location.
It has replaced all of my legacy backup solutions.
The real-time replication of data is the most valuable feature. It is a vast improvement in scheduled daily backups. Real-time data is streamed to the offsite data center, which allows us to restore our mission-critical applications up to 10 seconds from when the last changes were made in our system. If we enter a sales order or enter any kind of information in our ERP application it is replicated within 10 seconds to the offsite location. So if we were to have a disaster, it takes about five seconds right now if I look at it. If we were to have a disaster, we would not only have current data, but we'd also be up and running within hours at our offsite data center, rather than days if we had a tape backup solution.
We have begun using it for longterm retention. We also replicate our file server. Our file server has archive or historical data that we have to restore occasionally. And restoring from long term retention is applicable to those types of scenarios, versus the streaming of the data, the real-time data. The longterm retention allows us to restore from further back in time. Real-time is more for recent changes to the data, and the longterm retention is for if we have to restore from further back.
It provides continuous data protection. It has been extremely effective. I've done failover testing, and the data is accurate and current. It works.
In terms of ease of use, Zerto is very intuitive. The graphical user interface of the application, both for monitoring VPG replication, longterm retention success, the configuration of VPG for longterm retention, and the analytics feature is intuitive and allows you to essentially analyze any changes to your environment. All of that requires some training but is not incredibly complex. It's presented in a very easy to use format.
Zerto dramatically decreases the amount of time it takes to do a failover. I can essentially do it all by myself and I'm one person, I don't really need help. It allows me to restore our environment fully in a matter of seconds, literally. I can do that on my own from my desk very easily and with no outside help.
Compared to other products, I would praise the intuitiveness of the product. But I think that can always be improved. The intuitiveness of the graphical user interface, while it is very solid and I don't have issues navigating it. I would say that it can always be improved.
I have been using Zerto for around three years.
The stability is very solid. It just runs. It has not crashed or had issues. So long as you stay on top of the versions of the application and you have it installed on reliable hardware, you're going to be just fine.
It can scale into the cloud. I know it has that capability, but I have not done that yet.
It's essentially myself and I have one junior person that uses the application, but it's mostly myself.
It's used for all of our mission-critical servers. Not every single one of our servers, but probably about a third of our total servers.
I do not have plans to increase usage.
The tech support is top-notch. I have an engineer who I work with on a regular basis that communicates with me anytime there is an issue. He has worked side by side with me on any issues, questions, and implementations that I have wanted to accomplish. They by far go above and beyond more than any of my other vendors and I have quite a few so that says a lot about them.
We previously used Asigra. We switched because of the cost, limitations, and complexity.
When we decided to go with Zerto, it was imperative that it provided both backup and DR in one platform. Granted, we didn't take advantage of it for a while but that's entirely my own fault. It was very important to have that functionality.
It was initially set up by a third party. But since then, I've had to re-set it up and it was pretty easy. It wasn't very complicated. It was quick. There were instructions that we followed pretty closely and there were no issues, so it was straightforward. There were a handful of steps, but nothing overly complex. The deployment took around 30 to 45 minutes.
We haven't had a need to use it in an actual live disaster scenario, but we have that capability, which we did not before. But if we had to use it, it would save us a tremendous amount of money. Tremendous.
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
We also evaluated Veeam.
It has not saved us time in data recovery situation due to ransomware just because we thankfully haven't had any issues. I've done some testing and in those types of situations, it would be greatly beneficial. But I have not had any of those situations currently.
At this time it has not helped to reduce downtime in any situation.
We don't have it replicated in the cloud at this time so it has not saved use money by enabling us to do DR in the cloud, rather than in a physical data center.
I would recommend Zerto to anybody considering it.
My advice would be to make sure that after implementing the product, go through and accomplish the training labs so you know how to use a product really well, develop a disaster recovery plan in the event that you should need to use the product, and work closely with your Zerto engineer to ensure that the implementation fits your business needs.
The biggest lesson I have learned is how valuable real-time replication of data can be in the event of a disaster and how valuable that functionality is in the event of a disaster. It has the potential to save the company many days' worth of lost business.
If I could rate it an 11 (out of 10), I would. But we'll go with 10.