My company is very familiar with workflows. When it comes to designing workflows and how workflows work, I would say that we are not an application program company. We are able to do an awful lot with platforms like Coda, Airtable, and ServiceNow. ServicePRO is a company that cleans up messes. Airtable's automation features enhance data management with AI. In our company, we don't use AI much in inside applications. The tool has helped us design better workflows. With the tool's graphical interface, we would pretty much map out what we wanted to do. The tool's AI would suggest to you what is better and what needs to be moved where. It does help a little with the searching part, especially when somebody from the application attempts to pull up a document with the help of the student ID number. If they don't get a hit on that, the AI would ask for the student's date of birth, and then the AI would be able to locate it via the date of birth and name instead of the ID number, which may or may not be accurate. It is nice to have AI, and it makes it easier to train the customer on how to use it because you have to provide less training. I don't have to train them to say that the ID number is not the best search field. I would recommend Airtable to others for managing workflows. The tool's salespeople were really easy to deal with, and the support people were also excellent. The product works. It is easy to design workflows with, and we don't have to spend tons of money on somebody to write codes. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
The determining factor rests on the financial aspect, specifically the budgetary considerations. Given the context of being a startup with limited financial resources, there is a necessity to seek solutions that are both cost-effective and offer a range of functionalities.
Due to the flexibility and customizability of Airtable I highly recommend leaning on someone from the sales or support team to help you mockup a base example related to your use case. It appears as a blank slate when you create a new base, and a quick mockup would help with understanding how it actually works. It's in Airtable’s and the purchasers’ best interests to get to that "light bulb" moment quickly, especially for individuals who are new to Airtable or who have only worked with older versions and might not be familiar with all its capabilities. It is hard to fully appreciate the power of Airtable for your needs by clicking through their website or opening up some templates. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
For a record-based database, Airtable is the best alternative to Google Sheets. It provides a lot of features that are better than Google Sheets or other Excel software. It can be used for clients and project management. I rate the overall product an eight-point five out of ten.
I would rate the product a ten out of ten. It depends on the use case. For example, if you want something that's more table format, timelines, or a database back end for some other front end, as long as not more than ten thousand rows, you can still use Airtable. It's a perfect tool to get started with. But if it's a very complex project that needs a lot of customization, especially if it needs very fine-tuned roles and user roles, I suggest staying away from Airtable. Customized user roles are not capable of strength for Airtable.
I would rate the tool a ten out of ten. We don't have any other product in the market combining data storage functionality and interface design simultaneously. There is no specific version for the solution. The tool gives out updates that apply to all users by default.
Airtable was founded on the belief that software shouldn't dictate how you work – you should dictate how it works. Our mission is to democratize software creation by enabling anyone to build the software tools that meet their needs. Creators and creatives around the world use Airtable to do everything from cattle tracking to filmmaking, and they have great things to say.
Our team brings experience from building and scaling products touching millions of people at Google, Facebook, Salesforce,...
My company is very familiar with workflows. When it comes to designing workflows and how workflows work, I would say that we are not an application program company. We are able to do an awful lot with platforms like Coda, Airtable, and ServiceNow. ServicePRO is a company that cleans up messes. Airtable's automation features enhance data management with AI. In our company, we don't use AI much in inside applications. The tool has helped us design better workflows. With the tool's graphical interface, we would pretty much map out what we wanted to do. The tool's AI would suggest to you what is better and what needs to be moved where. It does help a little with the searching part, especially when somebody from the application attempts to pull up a document with the help of the student ID number. If they don't get a hit on that, the AI would ask for the student's date of birth, and then the AI would be able to locate it via the date of birth and name instead of the ID number, which may or may not be accurate. It is nice to have AI, and it makes it easier to train the customer on how to use it because you have to provide less training. I don't have to train them to say that the ID number is not the best search field. I would recommend Airtable to others for managing workflows. The tool's salespeople were really easy to deal with, and the support people were also excellent. The product works. It is easy to design workflows with, and we don't have to spend tons of money on somebody to write codes. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
The determining factor rests on the financial aspect, specifically the budgetary considerations. Given the context of being a startup with limited financial resources, there is a necessity to seek solutions that are both cost-effective and offer a range of functionalities.
It is a good product. I rate it an eight out of ten.
Due to the flexibility and customizability of Airtable I highly recommend leaning on someone from the sales or support team to help you mockup a base example related to your use case. It appears as a blank slate when you create a new base, and a quick mockup would help with understanding how it actually works. It's in Airtable’s and the purchasers’ best interests to get to that "light bulb" moment quickly, especially for individuals who are new to Airtable or who have only worked with older versions and might not be familiar with all its capabilities. It is hard to fully appreciate the power of Airtable for your needs by clicking through their website or opening up some templates. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
For a record-based database, Airtable is the best alternative to Google Sheets. It provides a lot of features that are better than Google Sheets or other Excel software. It can be used for clients and project management. I rate the overall product an eight-point five out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I would rate the product a ten out of ten. It depends on the use case. For example, if you want something that's more table format, timelines, or a database back end for some other front end, as long as not more than ten thousand rows, you can still use Airtable. It's a perfect tool to get started with. But if it's a very complex project that needs a lot of customization, especially if it needs very fine-tuned roles and user roles, I suggest staying away from Airtable. Customized user roles are not capable of strength for Airtable.
I would rate the tool a ten out of ten. We don't have any other product in the market combining data storage functionality and interface design simultaneously. There is no specific version for the solution. The tool gives out updates that apply to all users by default.