Head of Cloud & DevOps at Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët-Boigny
Real User
Top 20
2024-11-27T15:52:58Z
Nov 27, 2024
Understanding solution requirements is crucial when considering Aurora. For overall performance and ease of maintenance, I recommend Aurora. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
I highly recommend Amazon Aurora to others, as it has proven effective for us in various projects, even those requiring significant architectural considerations.
Aurora is a great product. Since it’s an open-source solution, it’s not as expensive to license as other enterprise-grade databases. I highly recommend it. Overall, I rate the solution as ten out of ten.
I recommend Amazon Aurora and rate it an eight out of ten. It is easy to set up and scale. We do not need engineers to manage it as it is a cloud solution. It has an automated backup feature. It has multi-layer deployments, high availability, and no chance of data loss. We can create a DDR with a single click.
EVP Technology at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-05-03T07:07:00Z
May 3, 2023
I would check you to check your use cases and the pain points you have with the current database and then recommend you make a benchmarking comparison. In case of any specific requirements, we can evaluate if Amazon Aurora is a good fit. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because our objective was not fulfilled.
I would recommend it for enterprises or corporations, but not for small-scale use. I would recommend it in situations when stability and speed are important. For large data sets, not for medium or small data sets or volumes of data If you have a lot of data, you should probably go with Aurora. It is not something I would recommend to anybody else. It is not worth the price. In my previous company, we had a partnership with Amazon. I would rate Amazon Aurora a seven out of ten.
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. For Postgre and MySQL, it is all quite good. However, it is a bit costlier. Given the features they have provided, it's okay, but for the smaller clients, they feel it is a bit too costly.
Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.
Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is...
Understanding solution requirements is crucial when considering Aurora. For overall performance and ease of maintenance, I recommend Aurora. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
I highly recommend Amazon Aurora to others, as it has proven effective for us in various projects, even those requiring significant architectural considerations.
Aurora is a great product. Since it’s an open-source solution, it’s not as expensive to license as other enterprise-grade databases. I highly recommend it. Overall, I rate the solution as ten out of ten.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I recommend Amazon Aurora and rate it an eight out of ten. It is easy to set up and scale. We do not need engineers to manage it as it is a cloud solution. It has an automated backup feature. It has multi-layer deployments, high availability, and no chance of data loss. We can create a DDR with a single click.
I would check you to check your use cases and the pain points you have with the current database and then recommend you make a benchmarking comparison. In case of any specific requirements, we can evaluate if Amazon Aurora is a good fit. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because our objective was not fulfilled.
I would rate the tool an eight out of ten. Aurora is plays well for us. I recommend this solution for zero downtime.
My advice to others who want to use this solution should go through the AWS foundation courses. I rate Amazon Aurora an eight out of ten.
I would recommend it for enterprises or corporations, but not for small-scale use. I would recommend it in situations when stability and speed are important. For large data sets, not for medium or small data sets or volumes of data If you have a lot of data, you should probably go with Aurora. It is not something I would recommend to anybody else. It is not worth the price. In my previous company, we had a partnership with Amazon. I would rate Amazon Aurora a seven out of ten.
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. For Postgre and MySQL, it is all quite good. However, it is a bit costlier. Given the features they have provided, it's okay, but for the smaller clients, they feel it is a bit too costly.