For large-scale enterprise solutions, Kubernetes is recommended due to its scalability. Despite costing considerations, EKS alleviates the burden of procedural complexities, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
If you have the money, I would recommend the EKS product to other users who are looking into implementing it. It's a good tool. It really takes some of the management burden off your back. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
I already have recommended it to many people. If you're using AWS for other services, definitely go with EKS because it doesn't make sense to move to another cloud vendor if you're already using everything in AWS. The integration is really good. You get AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) on top of it, load balancer, GuardDuty, and Inspector. So security-wise, it's really nice to have EKS surrounded by those security tools. My advice would be to try to go with AWS Fargate initially. Try to understand how ECR (Elastic Container Registry) works because it also costs you money, so make sure your image isn't too big. And if you can, go with AWS CodeCommit, it makes things very fast. And for EKS, they can use Fargate with EKS as a service. So, users don't have to worry about scalability and reliability. It's totally managed from the user's end. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Some of the Kubernetes clusters were on Amazon, GCP, and Azure. I used most of them on-premises. I installed the Kubernetes cluster in my own environment. Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.
I rate the overall product a nine out of ten. If you want to start quickly and have time constraints, you can use Amazon solutions because no time or effort is needed to prepare your environment for the market, and no hardware or infrastructure requirements are required. It can affect team productivity with a few customers. Productivity depends on the customers' knowledge. If their developers or software team are familiar with using hyperscale issues, it is very productive to use it. If you need off-site backup solutions, object storage, or to check your data's secondary version for disaster recovery, you can use AWS Backup or Amazon EKS service, like S3 buckets. It's very useful.
With numerous tools and plugins available for EKS like Graphite and Prometheus, users can effectively manage logs and monitor performance. For beginners, it's essential to grasp the fundamentals of Docker and containerization and understand how containers operate. Once these basics are clear, the next step is to familiarize oneself with Kubernetes and container orchestration concepts. I rate it a nine out of ten.
One of the aspects of Kubecost and Amazon EKS is that you don't have to manage the master node. The scalability and connectivity between API servers and its resources, including its scheduler and controller, are all taken care of by AWS. Not being easily able to log in to your master node makes things secure. I found the cluster autoscaler of AWS to be very helpful. It is easier for users since the cluster autoscaler takes care of the nodes, making everything easy for me. With the cluster autoscaler, all the resources are presented to me, so I need not consider any integrations from the outside environment. The aforementioned reasons made it easy for me to set up the software and scale down the resources easily. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. Kubernetes is a product from Google, which offers good compatibility. Kubernetes and its compatibility with Amazon is decent enough for users, in my opinion. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
It's a great service. Some services are more expensive compared to other providers. But in general, it's the best option for medium or large enterprises. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Review the organization's strategy with your strategy, whether it is oriented to the portability of your applications. Overall, I would rate Amazon EKS a nine out of ten.
I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. It is the best platform for Kubernetes. The tool is also compliant. You need a demo to get started with it.
Head of Digital Transformation at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-04-26T18:59:00Z
Apr 26, 2023
I would rate the tool a ten out of ten. The product is very easy to use since it is based on Kubernetes. It is a great tool for complex environments with multiple applications.
In the internal cluster, we have four hundred people working with Amazon EKS. We have a lot of customers running billions of transactions. Overall, I rate Amazon EKS a nine out of ten.
Specialist Data Analysis vehicle safety at Cubeware
Real User
2022-10-27T13:01:20Z
Oct 27, 2022
On a scale of one to ten, I would give it a six. With the correct technical support individual, you can do well with implementation. If you are not sure about the technical support side for implementation I would wait until you are ready.
Solution Architect Grade I at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2022-09-08T13:19:00Z
Sep 8, 2022
On a scale of one to 10, we would give the product an overall rating of eight. EKS is for deploying microservice projects. If you have multiple services in your application, you can deploy them and design your application accordingly. We can deploy EKS microservices on any service we are developing. I would certainly recommend the product to new users, but it would depend on the technology stack and the project. If a certain use case requires EKS, I would definitely advise using EKS rather than Google or Azure's EKS. I recommend Amazon Cloud Services for its reliable support and minimum downtime.
If you are interested in implementing the solution, first refer to the documentation or existing use cases. For example, a streaming company similar to Netflix can adopt and modify a use case related to the Amazon portal. There are resources that help with deciding to implement the solution. I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Cloud Architect & Devops engineer at KdmConsulting
Real User
2022-07-09T03:27:16Z
Jul 9, 2022
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Amazon EKS is the best service because it has proper security packages and manages AMI. Also, I'm working on GCP and have seen GKE services. With Amazon EKS AWS, we can do a lot of integration with our Kubernetes Cluster.
Practice Director, Global Infrastructure Services at Wipro Limited
Real User
2022-01-19T11:20:19Z
Jan 19, 2022
I'm an integrator of the solution. The solution can be deployed both on the cloud and on-premises. We are using the latest version of the solution at this time. I can't speak to the exact version number, however. I would recommend this solution to others. I'd rate the product at a nine out of ten. We're pretty happy with its capabilities so far.
We're not on the latest version. We are three or so versions back. However, we're almost on the latest version, which may be 1.19. The version's no longer an issue. For us, the issue was that Amazon started with the ECS, the Elastic Container Services. Therefore, while we were using Kubernetes and then Google Cloud, for example, for a while and we had developed all the tools when a client came to us and said they wanted to cluster within the Amazon development cluster. That was the ECS. After that, Amazon added the EKS. Our first deployment in Amazon was on our own deployment of the cluster, not on any services. We didn't want to use the ECS, we wanted to use a cluster. We wanted a managed version, so we don't have to manage it ourselves, due to the fact that it's a little bit of a mess if you manage it. I would advise new users to make sure that your cluster's secure. Make sure you're using a good networking configuration in your EKS. You need to get the NAT and the router going just on the subnet. You might have to pay for that. There are open-source tools to use, however, you can also pay for their monitoring. When you have a development pipeline, we suggest having multiple clusters, not just one. Then you can really isolate your production cluster and make it really secure and maybe relax a little bit for your DEV and then QA, as you might want to have more things in there. You just need to make sure you remove those tools from your production box. It's easier to have multiple clusters and really partition the cluster per environment, development, QA, testing environment, integration testing, whatever, and then you have your production environment, which is really kind of locked down so that nobody has access to it except specific people. In general, I would rate this solution at an eight out of ten.
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a fully managed Kubernetes service. Customers such as Intel, Snap, Intuit, GoDaddy, and Autodesk trust EKS to run their most sensitive and mission critical applications because of its security, reliability, and scalability.
EKS is the best place to run Kubernetes for several reasons. First, you can choose to run your EKS clusters using AWS Fargate, which is serverless compute for containers. Fargate removes the need to provision and manage...
For large-scale enterprise solutions, Kubernetes is recommended due to its scalability. Despite costing considerations, EKS alleviates the burden of procedural complexities, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
If you have the money, I would recommend the EKS product to other users who are looking into implementing it. It's a good tool. It really takes some of the management burden off your back. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
I already have recommended it to many people. If you're using AWS for other services, definitely go with EKS because it doesn't make sense to move to another cloud vendor if you're already using everything in AWS. The integration is really good. You get AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) on top of it, load balancer, GuardDuty, and Inspector. So security-wise, it's really nice to have EKS surrounded by those security tools. My advice would be to try to go with AWS Fargate initially. Try to understand how ECR (Elastic Container Registry) works because it also costs you money, so make sure your image isn't too big. And if you can, go with AWS CodeCommit, it makes things very fast. And for EKS, they can use Fargate with EKS as a service. So, users don't have to worry about scalability and reliability. It's totally managed from the user's end. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Some of the Kubernetes clusters were on Amazon, GCP, and Azure. I used most of them on-premises. I installed the Kubernetes cluster in my own environment. Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.
I rate the overall product a nine out of ten. If you want to start quickly and have time constraints, you can use Amazon solutions because no time or effort is needed to prepare your environment for the market, and no hardware or infrastructure requirements are required. It can affect team productivity with a few customers. Productivity depends on the customers' knowledge. If their developers or software team are familiar with using hyperscale issues, it is very productive to use it. If you need off-site backup solutions, object storage, or to check your data's secondary version for disaster recovery, you can use AWS Backup or Amazon EKS service, like S3 buckets. It's very useful.
With numerous tools and plugins available for EKS like Graphite and Prometheus, users can effectively manage logs and monitor performance. For beginners, it's essential to grasp the fundamentals of Docker and containerization and understand how containers operate. Once these basics are clear, the next step is to familiarize oneself with Kubernetes and container orchestration concepts. I rate it a nine out of ten.
One of the aspects of Kubecost and Amazon EKS is that you don't have to manage the master node. The scalability and connectivity between API servers and its resources, including its scheduler and controller, are all taken care of by AWS. Not being easily able to log in to your master node makes things secure. I found the cluster autoscaler of AWS to be very helpful. It is easier for users since the cluster autoscaler takes care of the nodes, making everything easy for me. With the cluster autoscaler, all the resources are presented to me, so I need not consider any integrations from the outside environment. The aforementioned reasons made it easy for me to set up the software and scale down the resources easily. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. Kubernetes is a product from Google, which offers good compatibility. Kubernetes and its compatibility with Amazon is decent enough for users, in my opinion. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
Overall, I rate Amazon EKS a seven out of ten.
I would recommend the solution. Overall, I rate it a nine out of ten.
I rate Amazon EKS a nine out of ten.
I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
It's a great service. Some services are more expensive compared to other providers. But in general, it's the best option for medium or large enterprises. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Review the organization's strategy with your strategy, whether it is oriented to the portability of your applications. Overall, I would rate Amazon EKS a nine out of ten.
I would recommend Amazon EKS to other users. Overall, I rate Amazon EKS an eight out of ten.
I rate Amazon EKS nine out of 10.
I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. It is the best platform for Kubernetes. The tool is also compliant. You need a demo to get started with it.
I rate the solution as an eight. I advise others to use EKS ETL instead of AWS command prompt while deploying it.
I would rate the tool a ten out of ten. The product is very easy to use since it is based on Kubernetes. It is a great tool for complex environments with multiple applications.
In the internal cluster, we have four hundred people working with Amazon EKS. We have a lot of customers running billions of transactions. Overall, I rate Amazon EKS a nine out of ten.
I advise anyone planning to use Amazon EKS to do the training because it's initially tough to use the platform. I rate Amazon EKS as nine out of ten.
I would rate this solution as eight out of ten. I highly recommend Amazon EKS.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten and recommend it to others.
On a scale of one to ten, I would give it a six. With the correct technical support individual, you can do well with implementation. If you are not sure about the technical support side for implementation I would wait until you are ready.
On a scale of one to 10, we would give the product an overall rating of eight. EKS is for deploying microservice projects. If you have multiple services in your application, you can deploy them and design your application accordingly. We can deploy EKS microservices on any service we are developing. I would certainly recommend the product to new users, but it would depend on the technology stack and the project. If a certain use case requires EKS, I would definitely advise using EKS rather than Google or Azure's EKS. I recommend Amazon Cloud Services for its reliable support and minimum downtime.
If you are interested in implementing the solution, first refer to the documentation or existing use cases. For example, a streaming company similar to Netflix can adopt and modify a use case related to the Amazon portal. There are resources that help with deciding to implement the solution. I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Amazon EKS is the best service because it has proper security packages and manages AMI. Also, I'm working on GCP and have seen GKE services. With Amazon EKS AWS, we can do a lot of integration with our Kubernetes Cluster.
I would rate this solution 8 out of 10. I would definitely recommend this solution. It's a very good application, and the scalability is very good.
I'm an integrator of the solution. The solution can be deployed both on the cloud and on-premises. We are using the latest version of the solution at this time. I can't speak to the exact version number, however. I would recommend this solution to others. I'd rate the product at a nine out of ten. We're pretty happy with its capabilities so far.
I have found OpenShift to be a better tool and I would recommend it. I rate Amazon EKS an eight out of ten.
I recommend this solution to others who use the AWS cloud. I rate Amazon EKS a ten out of ten.
We're not on the latest version. We are three or so versions back. However, we're almost on the latest version, which may be 1.19. The version's no longer an issue. For us, the issue was that Amazon started with the ECS, the Elastic Container Services. Therefore, while we were using Kubernetes and then Google Cloud, for example, for a while and we had developed all the tools when a client came to us and said they wanted to cluster within the Amazon development cluster. That was the ECS. After that, Amazon added the EKS. Our first deployment in Amazon was on our own deployment of the cluster, not on any services. We didn't want to use the ECS, we wanted to use a cluster. We wanted a managed version, so we don't have to manage it ourselves, due to the fact that it's a little bit of a mess if you manage it. I would advise new users to make sure that your cluster's secure. Make sure you're using a good networking configuration in your EKS. You need to get the NAT and the router going just on the subnet. You might have to pay for that. There are open-source tools to use, however, you can also pay for their monitoring. When you have a development pipeline, we suggest having multiple clusters, not just one. Then you can really isolate your production cluster and make it really secure and maybe relax a little bit for your DEV and then QA, as you might want to have more things in there. You just need to make sure you remove those tools from your production box. It's easier to have multiple clusters and really partition the cluster per environment, development, QA, testing environment, integration testing, whatever, and then you have your production environment, which is really kind of locked down so that nobody has access to it except specific people. In general, I would rate this solution at an eight out of ten.