Have a developer ready to know what he's doing, and pretty documentation, really. As soon as it's really pretty much straightforward for a developer to use. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.
It is a good service. I would recommend it to my colleagues if they want to implement push notifications with SNS. Overall, I am very happy with this service. I would rate Amazon SNS a ten out of ten.
I would rate Amazon SNS an 8.5 out of ten. Not a ten because of the stability and customer support. I develop applications by using SNS and I start by using documents. There should be easier documentation with better points.
People should know when to use this solution. With so many AWS products out there, people are not sure which product to use in which scenario. SNS should be used only when you want a server-to-client connection, not when you need a server-to-server connection. For a server-to-server connection, you can use EventBridge. If you want a server-to-client connection and a one-to-many or many-to-many connection, you should use SNS. If you want a one-to-one connection, you should use SQS. You can go through the entire documentation and see if your particular use case requires you to use SNS or not. Finally, I would say, I'd rate Amazon SNS a nine out of ten. In my tenure of using it for two years, it has helped me in a lot of ways. It is a lot more solid than similar tools out there.
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) is a highly available, durable, secure, fully managed pub/sub messaging service that enables you to decouple microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. Amazon SNS provides topics for high-throughput, push-based, many-to-many messaging. Using Amazon SNS topics, your publisher systems can fan out messages to a large number of subscriber endpoints for parallel processing, including Amazon SQS queues, AWS Lambda functions, and HTTP/S...
Have a developer ready to know what he's doing, and pretty documentation, really. As soon as it's really pretty much straightforward for a developer to use. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.
I would rate the product an eight out of ten.
We would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten. It is user friendly and broadly used in the market.
I rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate this solution nine out of ten.
It is a good service. I would recommend it to my colleagues if they want to implement push notifications with SNS. Overall, I am very happy with this service. I would rate Amazon SNS a ten out of ten.
I would rate Amazon SNS an 8.5 out of ten. Not a ten because of the stability and customer support. I develop applications by using SNS and I start by using documents. There should be easier documentation with better points.
People should know when to use this solution. With so many AWS products out there, people are not sure which product to use in which scenario. SNS should be used only when you want a server-to-client connection, not when you need a server-to-server connection. For a server-to-server connection, you can use EventBridge. If you want a server-to-client connection and a one-to-many or many-to-many connection, you should use SNS. If you want a one-to-one connection, you should use SQS. You can go through the entire documentation and see if your particular use case requires you to use SNS or not. Finally, I would say, I'd rate Amazon SNS a nine out of ten. In my tenure of using it for two years, it has helped me in a lot of ways. It is a lot more solid than similar tools out there.