Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2021-06-05T16:21:50Z
Jun 5, 2021
Both Ansible and Atomic are good. Automic is more for complex installation for the enterprise. If I want to deploy applications such as Linux, AIX, Windows Server, and a Database and I have a complex environment, it's better to use Automic. If I just have a Linux machine, it is best to use Ansible. I have heard that Ansible has improved its capabilities in the last couple of years. We are very happy with this solution but the customers are not happy with the price, therefore I would rate Automic Continuous Delivery Automation an eight out of ten.
IT Process Automation Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-04-06T08:22:00Z
Apr 6, 2020
I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement. My advice to someone considering this solution is to be very flexible with this product. You can automate everything you want. The naming of the object is very important because the user's rights depends on the naming of the object. In the next release, I would like for them to include a workflow engine that I also can automate business processes and not just IT processes.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd rate it higher if the installation was easier and if their file transfers were faster.
Learn what your peers think about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.
Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for...
![Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_40/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg){kind=small}
Both Ansible and Atomic are good. Automic is more for complex installation for the enterprise. If I want to deploy applications such as Linux, AIX, Windows Server, and a Database and I have a complex environment, it's better to use Automic. If I just have a Linux machine, it is best to use Ansible. I have heard that Ansible has improved its capabilities in the last couple of years. We are very happy with this solution but the customers are not happy with the price, therefore I would rate Automic Continuous Delivery Automation an eight out of ten.
I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement. My advice to someone considering this solution is to be very flexible with this product. You can automate everything you want. The naming of the object is very important because the user's rights depends on the naming of the object. In the next release, I would like for them to include a workflow engine that I also can automate business processes and not just IT processes.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd rate it higher if the installation was easier and if their file transfers were faster.